User talk:Karalauryns

This is Karalauryns's talk page, where you can send them messages and comments.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Your submission at Articles for creation: 2020 coronavirus pandemic in Minnesota 2 has been accepted[edit]

2020 coronavirus pandemic in Minnesota 2, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. If your account is more than four days old and you have made at least 10 edits you can create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

Sulfurboy (talk) 21:03, 15 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Join Us for a Virtual Edit-a-thon[edit]

St. Catherine University Art+Feminism Edit-a-thon

Hello Karalauryns! You are invited to attend a virtual Art+Feminism edit-a-thon May 8 - May 15, 2020. Please join us and edit Wikipedia any time over these days as we collaboratively address the information gap about gender, feminism, and the arts on the internet.

Margitaw (talk) 02:26, 7 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

A kitten for you![edit]

Looking forward to your Wikipedia edits!

Hesse1984 (talk) 01:58, 8 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to the edit-a-thon![edit]

Here are some refreshments to enjoy. Happy editing!

Margitaw (talk) 16:54, 9 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Maya Stovall[edit]

Hello and welcome to Wikipedia. Just a note that I reverted your large edit to the above article. You took an article at hat had 32 sources, mostly independent, and turned it into an article with about half as many sources. You expanded the exhibitions section and sourced it 100% to the artist. We strive for an diversity of reliable sources. There was a little bit of good content that you added, but I am not going to spend all day trying to find it. What I would suggest you do is add your edits slowly and in small doses. Wikipedia is full of all kinds of policies and procedures, and going a bit at a time, rather than massively rewriting an article all at once, is usually the best way to go for new editors. ThatMontrealIP (talk) 21:27, 15 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

PS Two important guidelines in terms of sources are WP:RS and WP:PRIMARY. Using the artist as a source for information, for example, is much less desirable than using a review of on of her shows.ThatMontrealIP (talk) 21:39, 15 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]