Hello, Kapoor2013, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:
You may also want to complete the Wikipedia Adventure, an interactive tour that will help you learn the basics of editing Wikipedia. You can visit the Teahouse to ask questions or seek help.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Thanks for uploading File:Sui Dhaaga 2018.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
Your recent editing history at Shraddha Kapoor shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See BRD for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.
Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. Krimuk2.0 (talk) 09:17, 29 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]
File:Sui Dhaaga 2018.jpg listed for discussion[edit]
A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Sui Dhaaga 2018.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. Krimuk2.0 (talk) 09:18, 29 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, introducing inappropriate pages, such as File:Sui Dhaaga 2018.jpg, is not in accordance with our policies. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Under section G3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, the page has been nominated for deletion.
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. LaundryPizza03 (talk) 01:53, 1 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]
A tag has been placed on File:Shraddha Kapoor promotions.jpg requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section F3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a file licensed as "for non-commercial use only", "no derivative use", "for Wikipedia use only", or "used with permission"; and it has not been shown to comply with the limited standards for the use of non-free content. If you agree with the deletion, there is no need to do anything. If, however, you believe that this image may be retained on Wikipedia under one of the permitted conditions then:
state clearly the source of the image. If it has been copied from elsewhere on the web you should provide links to: the image itself, the page which uses it and the page which contains the license conditions.
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Krimuk2.0 (talk) 13:48, 4 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Orphaned non-free image File:Batti Gul Meter Chalu.jpg[edit]
⚠
Thanks for uploading File:Batti Gul Meter Chalu.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
If you're new to the process, articles for deletion is a group discussion (not a vote!) that usually lasts seven days. If you need it, there is a guide on how to contribute. Last but not least, you are highly encouraged to continue improving the article; just be sure not to remove the tag about the deletion nomination from the top.
Disambiguation link notification for January 13[edit]
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Sidharth Malhotra, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page INR (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:15, 13 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Moving Draft:Stree (2018 film) to main article space[edit]
I have returned Draft:Stree (2018 film) to the draftspace again. At the article's AfD (Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Untitled Dinesh Vijan film) consensus was clear that the article should either be deleted or kept as a draft until the film passes Wikipedia:NFILM criteria, which practically requires a film to have been released. Continuing to move the article into the main space when it is against the consensus of multiple editors is not a good idea. Please be patient, as I am sure that Stree will have it's day to be moved to the main space. However, if you continue to attempt to recreate the article, I will see it as disruptive editing and will request that you be blocked from editing. Thank you for your cooperation and again, please wait for the film to be released. SamHolt6 (talk) 07:46, 28 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]
A tag has been placed on File:Shraddha Kapoor 2018.jpg requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section F3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a file licensed as "for non-commercial use only", "no derivative use", "for Wikipedia use only", or "used with permission"; and it has not been shown to comply with the limited standards for the use of non-free content. If you agree with the deletion, there is no need to do anything. If, however, you believe that this image may be retained on Wikipedia under one of the permitted conditions then:
state clearly the source of the image. If it has been copied from elsewhere on the web you should provide links to: the image itself, the page which uses it and the page which contains the license conditions.
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Krimuk2.0 (talk) 13:32, 31 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks for uploading File:Stree production.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
Orphaned non-free image File:Batti Gul Meter Chaalu.jpg[edit]
⚠
Thanks for uploading File:Batti Gul Meter Chaalu.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
Your recent editing history at Shraddha Kapoor shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See BRD for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.
Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. Stop adding content that violate WP:CRYSTAL and WP:NOTABILITY policies. Krimuk2.0 (talk) 11:25, 9 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Your addition has been removed, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without evidence of permission from the copyright holder. If you are the copyright holder, please read Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for more information on uploading your material to Wikipedia. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted material, including text or images from print publications or from other websites, without an appropriate and verifiable license. All such contributions will be deleted. You may use external websites or publications as a source of information, but not as a source of content, such as sentences or images—you must write using your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. NeilNtalk to me 15:41, 10 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Hi there, when you make changes like these to section headings, please follow MOS:HEAD as your guideline. We use "Sentence case" not "Title Case". Please note the difference in capitalisation styles. Thank you, Cyphoidbomb (talk) 06:49, 25 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]
I think I have spoken to you multiple times about using sources that are considered reliable by Wikipedia standards. Once again, please read WP:ICTFSOURCES on what sources you can and cannot use on Indian film-related articles. Krimuk2.0 (talk) 14:42, 27 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]
DO NOT COPY is a fundamental concept in academia. Copying is academically dishonest and lazy, and any form of plagiarism or copyright violations is not tolerated anywhere in academia, and it will also not be tolerated at Wikipedia. Content you added here can be found verbatim here. This is unacceptable. Do not do this again, as your editing privileges will be interrupted if you do it again. Note also that closely paraphrasing is also problematic. All prose content must be written from scratch in your own words. If you are not capable of doing this, then you should find other ways to contribute.
Additionally, your edits here are problematic, because you appear to be drooling over Disha Patani. We write content in a neutral tone. We don't use hyperbole (exaggerations) or other extreme speech. Your additions of puffery-laden phrases like "extremely positive reviews" and "extreme popularity" violate our neutrality policy. If you are a paid editor, per WP:PAID you must disclose who your employer and client are, as well as any other relevant relationships.
Lastly, your description of critical response is not properly sourced. Any summary of overall opinion needs to come from a specific mainstream source (like Rotten Tomatoes, for examples), not from editors' own opinions. This is what we call original research. And you should be aware that phrases like "mixed to negative" and "mixed to positive" are meaningless. "Mixed" means positive and negative. "Mixed to negative" would mean "positive and negative to negative", which, as you can see, is meaningless. Cyphoidbomb (talk) 03:50, 28 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Please do not use blogs as references as you've done here. This is yet another basic editing concept. Anyone can start a blog or a website and publish whatever they want. We only care what reliable published sources with established reputations for fact-checking and accuracy have to say about anything. Please find better sources for this information, or it will be removed. Thank you. Cyphoidbomb (talk) 16:23, 28 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]
You really need to go to Talk:Shraddha Kapoor and discuss the awards/honours you are adding, as other editors seem to be rejecting your changes. Please do not restore the content until you've achieved consensus, as it will be considered edit-warring. Discussion is very important at Wikipedia, because this is a community project. Thank you, Cyphoidbomb (talk) 16:38, 28 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Your recent editing history shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See BRD for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.
Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.
If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant notice boards.
If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.
Orphaned non-free image File:Batti Gul Meter Chaalu.jpg[edit]
⚠
Thanks for uploading File:Batti Gul Meter Chaalu.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
Hi there, re: these edits, you simply cannot be here just to lavish praise and accolades on Shraddha Kapoor. Your use of hyperbole and puffery are not consistent with our policy on article neutrality. Surely she must have had some criticism levied at her, right? Where is it? Have you looked for it? Or is everything just "wide recognition", "talent", "huge fame and critical acclaim along with several accolades" (that one is remarkably saturated in drool) "positive reviews and audience acclaim", "Blockbuster", "mass popularity and became an instant hit". That section needs to be substantially reworked, and you need to familiarise yourself with our expectations on neutrality and WP:PUFFERY. Wikipedia will not tolerate promotional editing. Thank you. Cyphoidbomb (talk) 02:29, 14 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Hi again, the Banita Sandhu article you created is a bit problematic. We do not write about debutante actors, we write about notable actors. Our notability guideline for actors can be found at WP:NACTOR and see also our general notability guideline. You need to demonstrate that the subject has received substantial coverage from multiple outlets. Wikipedia is not a social media platform. It's not Instagram, it's not a Who's Who guide, and we are not here to promote run-of-the-mill people. Note also that if you are a paid editor, per WP:PAID, you must disclose who your client is, who is paying you or otherwise enriching you to edit, as well as any other relevant relationship. Cyphoidbomb (talk) 04:46, 14 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Speedy deletion nomination of Brahmastra (film)[edit]
Hello Kapoor2013,
I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Brahmastra (film) for deletion, because it seems to be an article that was created in violation of a block or ban. Content created by banned users will be deleted immediately.
If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.
You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions.
I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Banita Sandhu for deletion, because it seems to be an article that was created in violation of a block or ban. Content created by banned users will be deleted immediately.
If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.
You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions.
Orphaned non-free image File:Zee Music Company.jpg[edit]
⚠
Thanks for uploading File:Zee Music Company.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:The Humma Song, a page you created, has not been edited in 5 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.
If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.
You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.
If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.
Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 01:34, 6 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Speedy deletion nomination of Brahmastra (film)[edit]
Hello Kapoor2013,
I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Brahmastra (film) for deletion, because it seems to be inappropriate for a variety of reasons. For more details please see the notice on the article.
If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.
You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions.
Orphaned non-free image File:Student of the Year 2.jpg[edit]
⚠
Thanks for uploading File:Student of the Year 2.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.
If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.
Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. HasteurBot (talk) 04:00, 6 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks for uploading File:Namastey England.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
Thanks for uploading File:Nawabzaade.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Untitled Saina Nehwal biopic. Since you had some involvement with the Untitled Saina Nehwal biopic redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you wish to do so. UnitedStatesian (talk) 20:46, 14 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks for uploading File:Baarish (song).jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to remove Articles for deletion notices or comments from articles and Articles for deletion pages, as you did at Stree (2018 film), you may be blocked from editing. CHRISSYMAD ❯❯❯¯\_(ツ)_/¯ 15:07, 16 January 2018 (UTC)
There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved.--SamHolt6 (talk) 07:06, 10 February 2018 (UTC)
Your addition has been removed, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without evidence of permission from the copyright holder. If you are the copyright holder, please read Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for more information on uploading your material to Wikipedia. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted material, including text or images from print publications or from other websites, without an appropriate and verifiable license. All such contributions will be deleted. You may use external websites or publications as a source of information, but not as a source of content, such as sentences or images—you must write using your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. NeilN talk to me 15:41, 10 February 2018 (UTC)
Please stop your disruptive editing.
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}