User talk:KWriteReturn

Welcome![edit]

Hi KWriteReturn! I noticed your contributions and wanted to welcome you to the Wikipedia community. I hope you like it here and decide to stay.

As you get started, you may find this short tutorial helpful:

Learn more about editing

Alternatively, the contributing to Wikipedia page covers the same topics.

If you have any questions, we have a friendly space where experienced editors can help you here:

Get help at the Teahouse

If you are not sure where to help out, you can find a task here:

Volunteer at the Task Center

Happy editing! PiGuy3 (talk) 05:51, 13 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Problems with upload of File:MarekKowalkiewicz.jpeg[edit]

Thanks for uploading File:MarekKowalkiewicz.jpeg. You don't seem to have said where the image came from, who created it, or what the copyright status is. We require this information to verify that the image is legally usable on Wikipedia, and because most image licenses require giving credit to the image's creator.

To add this information, click on this link, then click the "Edit" tab at the top of the page and add the information to the image's description. If you need help, post your question on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 11:30, 18 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Problems with upload of File:Kowalkiewicz.jpeg[edit]

Thanks for uploading File:Kowalkiewicz.jpeg. You don't seem to have said where the image came from, who created it, or what the copyright status is. We require this information to verify that the image is legally usable on Wikipedia, and because most image licenses require giving credit to the image's creator.

To add this information, click on this link, then click the "Edit" tab at the top of the page and add the information to the image's description. If you need help, post your question on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 11:30, 18 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Marek Kowalkiewicz (professor) (December 22)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Lewcm was:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

The comment the reviewer left was:

There are sections of unsourced text including: "Poznań University of Economics and Business", "Microsoft Research Asia", "QUT and Chair in Digital Economy" (from 2016-2019 bit), "Keynotes", please either add reliable sources or remove these sections.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Marek Kowalkiewicz (professor) and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Lewcm Talk to me! 16:42, 22 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, KWriteReturn! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Lewcm Talk to me! 16:42, 22 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Marek Kowalkiewicz (professor) (January 25)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Qcne was:

Few things:

- Please ensure every single section and sub-section is appropriately cited. - Please reduce the External Links to only one or two, see WP:EXTERNAL.

- A lot of your sources seem primary: we would much prefer secondary sources.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Marek Kowalkiewicz (professor) and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Qcne (talk) 13:31, 25 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Marek Kowalkiewicz (professor) has been accepted[edit]

Marek Kowalkiewicz (professor), which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as B-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. This is a fantastic rating for a new article, and places it among the top 3% of accepted submissions — major kudos to you! You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Encoded Talk to me! 09:18, 16 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I have sent you a note about a page you started[edit]

Hello, KWriteReturn. Thank you for your work on Marek Kowalkiewicz. North8000, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

Nice work

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|North8000}}. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

North8000 (talk) 20:18, 30 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Cara Federici moved to draftspace[edit]

Thanks for your contributions to Cara Federici. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it needs more sources to establish notability and the sources right now aren't really reliable enough I think. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. Cleo Cooper (talk) 05:46, 26 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Cara Federici (April 26)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Qcne was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Your sources do not show this person is notable.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Cara Federici and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Qcne (talk) 07:15, 26 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Paid editing[edit]

You need to add paid editing disclosures for all of your paid editing; this includes Draft:Nicole Sahin and Draft:Cara Federici. Please do so before making any other edits. Thanks. Sam Kuru (talk) 11:33, 9 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Kuru Thanks, Sam. I did my first article through the wizard, which asked that question and I disclosed it. Do I disclose these other two pages on my user page? Do I just add a note to it? Cheers, Kate KWriteReturn (talk) 12:16, 9 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Disclosure on your user page utilizing the same format suffices. Sam Kuru (talk) 13:09, 9 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Kuru Do you mind if I ask you another question? I notice that the Sahin article has been moved from the mainspace - can I edit/remove the content which I think is causing the problem and then resubmit it (after I have disclosed that this is paid work, of course)? I'm relatively new to this and trying to understand how it works. Cheers, Kate KWriteReturn (talk) 12:47, 9 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I would strongly suggest using the WP:AFC process for all of your paid contributions. You've used a number of unacceptable sources, and significant clean-up of additional poor sources and of the promotional tone is needed. Sam Kuru (talk) 13:09, 9 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Kuru Thank you, I really appreciate your help. KWriteReturn (talk) 13:35, 9 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi @Kuru. I would like to be a good Wikipedian and I appreciate your advice. I have cleaned up Draft:Nicole Sahin - is it acceptable? Cheers, Kate KWriteReturn (talk) 23:32, 13 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]