User talk:KMO2014

Welcome![edit]

Hello, KMO2014, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of your edits to the page ArtRave: The Artpop Ball have not conformed to Wikipedia's verifiability policy, and may be removed if they have not yet been. Wikipedia articles should refer only to facts and interpretations that have been stated in print or on reputable websites or other forms of media. Always remember to provide a reliable source for quotations and for any material that is likely to be challenged, or it may be removed. Wikipedia also has a related policy against including original research in articles. Additionally, all new biographies of living people must contain at least one reliable source.

If you are stuck and looking for help, please see the guide for citing sources or come to the new contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Here are a few other good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{help me}} before the question. Again, welcome! —Indian:BIO · ^{[ ChitChat ]} 15:53, 25 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Image without license[edit]

Unspecified source/license for File:Crystallize Single Cover.jpg[edit]

Thanks for uploading File:Crystallize Single Cover.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. Even if you created the image yourself, you still need to release it so Wikipedia can use it. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you made this image yourself, you can use copyright tags like {{PD-self}} (to release all rights), {{self|CC-by-sa-3.0|GFDL}} (to require that you be credited), or any tag here - just go to the image, click edit, and add one of those. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by MifterBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. --MifterBot ^{(Talk • Contribs • Owner)} 14:45, 29 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

July 2014[edit]

Please do not introduce incorrect information into articles, as you did to MDNA (album). Your edits appear to be vandalism and have been reverted. If you believe the information you added was correct, please cite references or sources or discuss the changes on the article's talk page before making them again. If you would like to experiment, use the sandbox. Thank you. —Indian:BIO · ^{[ ChitChat ]} 15:22, 3 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:MDNA World Tour DVD Cover.jpg[edit]

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:MDNA World Tour DVD Cover.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 23:50, 7 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

July 2014[edit]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize pages by deliberately introducing incorrect information, as you did at List of highest-grossing concert tours, you may be blocked from editing. —Indian:BIO · ^{[ ChitChat ]} 11:44, 13 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you violate Wikipedia's no original research policy by inserting unpublished information or your personal analysis into an article, as you did at List of highest-grossing concert tours. —Indian:BIO · ^{[ ChitChat ]} 10:13, 14 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked temporarily from editing for abuse of editing privileges. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. However, you should read the guide to appealing blocks first.

Daniel Case (talk) 16:18, 14 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

August 2014[edit]

You have been warned and blocked before also for addition of original researches and creating false articles. Do you want to get indefinitely blocked? If not I suggest you stop creating false articles not confirmed like Me. I Am Mariah World Tour. —Indian:BIO · ^{[ ChitChat ]} 10:26, 5 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Mariah carey 2014 tour poster.jpg[edit]

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Mariah carey 2014 tour poster.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 13:50, 5 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:THE ELUSIVE CHANTEUSE SHOW.jpg[edit]

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:THE ELUSIVE CHANTEUSE SHOW.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. —Indian:BIO ^{[ ChitChat ]} 06:14, 15 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

January 2015[edit]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to blank out or remove portions of page content, templates, or other materials from Wikipedia, you may be blocked from editing. Thank you. Snuggums (talk / edits) 17:46, 11 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Rebel Heart Tour.jpg[edit]

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Rebel Heart Tour.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 23:22, 4 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

March 2015[edit]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you add unsourced material to Wikipedia. Snuggums (talk / edits) 17:58, 10 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Crystallize Single Cover.jpg[edit]

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Crystallize Single Cover.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:30, 16 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

June 2015[edit]

Please stop making test edits to Wikipedia, as you did to Kylie Summer 2015. It is considered vandalism, which, under Wikipedia policy, can lead to being blocked from editing. If you would like to experiment again, please use the sandbox. livelikemusic ^{my talk page!} 15:06, 28 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open![edit]

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 17:06, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of File:The Formation World Tour Poster.jpg[edit]

A tag has been placed on File:The Formation World Tour Poster.jpg requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section F1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the image is an unused redundant copy (all pixels the same or scaled down) of an image in the same file format, which is on Wikipedia (not on Commons), and all inward links have been updated.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. —IB ^{[ Poke ]} 22:29, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open![edit]

Hello, KMO2014. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2017 election voter message[edit]

Hello, KMO2014. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

January 2018[edit]

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Britney: Piece of Me. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.

Please be particularly aware that Wikipedia's policy on edit warring states:

Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made.
Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes; work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing.
Instead of continuing to revert edits, please use the talk page to settle the dispute. livelikemusic talk! 04:14, 7 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

All the Hits Tour (Lionel Richie and Mariah Carey)[edit]

I'm the one who added it all...... — Calvin999 15:13, 10 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

January 2018[edit]

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.

Please be particularly aware that Wikipedia's policy on edit warring states:

Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made.
Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes; work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing.
You seem to like edit-warring, and ignoring these messages and not responded does not bode well for your case. Please reconsider your editing patterns before you are reported, and likely blocked. livelikemusic talk! 13:30, 16 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message[edit]

Hello, KMO2014. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2019 election voter message[edit]

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:17, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Kiss Me Once Live.jpg[edit]

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Kiss Me Once Live.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 02:22, 17 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message[edit]

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:45, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message[edit]

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:38, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

January 2022[edit]

Please stop your disruptive editing such as the removal of sourced information on Daydream World Tour and Butterfly World Tour. If you continue to blank out or remove portions of page content, templates, or other materials from Wikipedia, you may be blocked from editing. Thank you. 11:51, 12 January 2021 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2603:6081:8405:9C49:99FB:B3C8:80A6:17E0 (talk)

January 2022 [2][edit]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you remove sourced material from Wikipedia. ilovetati91 06:28, 30 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The rules regarding “Biographies of living persons” clearly demonstrate that “Editors must take particular care when writing biographical material about living persons. Contentious material about a living person that is unsourced or poorly sourced should be removed immediately; do not move it to the talk page. This applies to any material related to living persons on any page in any namespace, not just article space.” Further, “BLPs should be written responsibly, cautiously, and in a dispassionate tone, avoiding both understatement and overstatement. Articles should document in a non-partisan manner what reliable secondary sources have published about the subjects, and in some circumstances what the subjects have published about themselves.” In Nickson’s book about Carey, no reliable published source was provided to prove that 150k and 200k tickets were respectively sold for Carey’s Tokyo concerts in 1996 and 1998. In this sense, Nickson’s claims could be entirely fabricated, and editing such claims into Carey’s page could be seen as an overstatement or even an understatement of Carey’s touring career. Moreover, by labelling his own book as an “unauthorized biography”, Nickson clearly attempted to avoid his legal liability for the content since an “unauthorized biography” would no doubt give rise to untrue or false claims as well as pure fabrications. Thus, it is unlikely that Nickson’s book is an appropriate source considering all mentioned aspects and it should not be included in any Carey-related pages. Thanks! KMO2014 (talk) 17:12, 8 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

March 2022[edit]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you remove sourced material from Wikipedia such as you have continue to do on pages like Daydream World Tour and Butterfly World Tour. ilovetati91 12:23, 5 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The rules regarding “Biographies of living persons” clearly demonstrate that “Editors must take particular care when writing biographical material about living persons. Contentious material about a living person that is unsourced or poorly sourced should be removed immediately; do not move it to the talk page. This applies to any material related to living persons on any page in any namespace, not just article space.” Further, “BLPs should be written responsibly, cautiously, and in a dispassionate tone, avoiding both understatement and overstatement. Articles should document in a non-partisan manner what reliable secondary sources have published about the subjects, and in some circumstances what the subjects have published about themselves.” In Nickson’s book about Carey, no reliable published source was provided to prove that 150k and 200k tickets were respectively sold for Carey’s Tokyo concerts in 1996 and 1998. In this sense, Nickson’s claims could be entirely fabricated, and editing such claims into Carey’s page could be seen as an overstatement or even an understatement of Carey’s touring career. Moreover, by labelling his own book as an “unauthorized biography”, Nickson clearly attempted to avoid his legal liability for the content since an “unauthorized biography” would no doubt give rise to untrue or false claims as well as pure fabrications. Thus, it is unlikely that Nickson’s book is an appropriate source considering all mentioned aspects and it should not be included in any Carey-related pages. Thanks! KMO2014 (talk) 17:12, 8 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

March 2022 [2][edit]

You currently appear to still be engaged in an edit war and removing sourced material. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.

Please be particularly aware that Wikipedia's policy on edit warring states:

Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made.
Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes; work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing.
You seem to like edit-warring, and ignoring these messages and not responded does not bode well for your case. Please reconsider your editing patterns before you are reported, and likely blocked. Ilovetati91 (talk) 19:45, 6 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The rules regarding “Biographies of living persons” clearly demonstrate that “Editors must take particular care when writing biographical material about living persons. Contentious material about a living person that is unsourced or poorly sourced should be removed immediately; do not move it to the talk page. This applies to any material related to living persons on any page in any namespace, not just article space.” Further, “BLPs should be written responsibly, cautiously, and in a dispassionate tone, avoiding both understatement and overstatement. Articles should document in a non-partisan manner what reliable secondary sources have published about the subjects, and in some circumstances what the subjects have published about themselves.” In Nickson’s book about Carey, no reliable published source was provided to prove that 150k and 200k tickets were respectively sold for Carey’s Tokyo concerts in 1996 and 1998. In this sense, Nickson’s claims could be entirely fabricated, and editing such claims into Carey’s page could be seen as an overstatement or even an understatement of Carey’s touring career. Moreover, by labelling his own book as an “unauthorized biography”, Nickson clearly attempted to avoid his legal liability for the content since an “unauthorized biography” would no doubt give rise to untrue or false claims as well as pure fabrications. Thus, it is unlikely that Nickson’s book is an appropriate source considering all mentioned aspects and it should not be included in any Carey-related pages. Thanks! KMO2014 (talk) 17:12, 8 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Source meets Wikipedia source criteria 1-4: Publication, Traceability, Authenticity, Relevance and as a non-self-published secondary sources, i.e., a document or recording that relates or discusses information originally presented elsewhere. Further removal of this cited info will result in bans (as these several warnings on this page indicate). "Unauthorized biography" is a genre of biographies and the author is well-established in music journalism. Your IP is being reported to wikipedia administrators for continued disruptions despite warnings. Ilovetati91 (talk) 05:18, 9 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Additionally, it IS cited in the published biography. Ilovetati91 (talk) 05:22, 9 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message[edit]

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:28, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]