Hello, Julio Puentes! Welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions to this free encyclopedia. If you decide that you need help, check out Getting Help below, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking or using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your username and the date. Finally, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field. Below are some useful links to facilitate your involvement. Happy editing! lifebaka++ 23:19, 21 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Hello, Julio Puentes, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created, like Una Familia De Diez, may not conform to some of Wikipedia's guidelines for page creation, and may soon be deleted.
There's a page about creating articles you may want to read called Your first article. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the New contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{helpme}} on this page, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers:
I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Wikipedia:Where to ask a question or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! lifebaka++ 23:19, 21 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Duranguense, did not appear to be constructive and has been automatically reverted by ClueBot. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. If you believe there has been a mistake and would like to report a false positive, please report it here and then remove this warning from your talk page. If your edit was not vandalism, please feel free to make your edit again after reporting it. The following is the log entry regarding this warning: Duranguense was changed by Julio Puentes(u)(t) replacing entire content with something else on 2009-08-22T04:14:26+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot (talk) 04:14, 22 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
A tag has been placed on La carretera requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a very short article providing little or no context to the reader. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content. You may wish to consider using a Wizard to help you create articles - see the Article Wizard.
If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. BejinhanTalk 06:09, 10 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Please refrain from introducing inappropriate pages, such as Raymond Ilax, to Wikipedia. Doing so is not in accordance with our policies. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox.
If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. —Largo Plazo (talk) 00:48, 27 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]
This is the last warning you will receive for your disruptive edits. The next time you create an inappropriate page, you will be blocked from editing. --PMDrive1061 (talk) 01:13, 27 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Hi. Sorry to have come off so harsh, but you'd received prior warnings for inappropriate content. If you're still unsure as to what's cool and what isn't, please feel free to ask me. I won't be on the site on a regular basis for another week or two - I just moved and I have no internet at the new house yet - but I can check in either at work or at a Starbucks, which is what I'm doing now. Believe me, I have all the patience in the world for a sincere user, so don't worry about any snotty messages. :) --PMDrive1061 (talk) 19:17, 27 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Hi. Okay. Thanks for the explanation. Please remember that any article that is not notable risk being deleted. Just make sure it follows Wikipedia's article writing guidelines. You might find it helpful to read this. Happy editing! BejinhanTalk 03:50, 28 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]
One more note, please do not remove any CSD tags from the article. If you want the article to be kept, place {{hangon}} at the bottom of the tag and then state your reasons(why it shouldn't be deleted) at the article's talk page. BejinhanTalk 07:21, 2 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
First you would need to find the picture and copy the name. Then, there's a botton on the top with a picture on it. Click that and paste the picture name in there. Hope this helps, Abce2|This isnot a test 03:23, 3 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
File source problem with File:La_carretera.jpg[edit]
File Copyright problem
Thanks for uploading File:La_carretera.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, their copyright should also be acknowledged.
If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Wikipedia:Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 17:49, 4 November 2009 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. feydey (talk) 17:49, 4 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
File copyright problem with File:Que dices.jpg[edit]
File Copyright problem
Thank you for uploading File:Que dices.jpg. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the file. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.
If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their license and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link.
File copyright problem with File:Profiesor.jpg[edit]
File Copyright problem
Thank you for uploading File:Profiesor.jpg. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the file. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.
If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their license and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link.
If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. ZooFari 15:53, 7 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
A tag has been placed on Pimpinela requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about about a person, organization (band, club, company, etc.) or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable. You may also wish to consider using a Wizard to help you create articles - see the Article Wizard.
If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. Airplanemantalk 05:54, 27 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
I have declined the deletion request. Please accept my apologies for the way your article has been treated. -- Ynot? 15:17, 27 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Hello, thanks for your contributions so far. Could you make sure that you add references to reliable sources when you make new articles, especially ones about living people? Otherwise, they might get deleted. Thanks, --BelovedFreak 22:09, 19 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Hello Julio Puentes! Thank you for your contributions. I am a bot notifying you on behalf of the the unreferenced biographies team that 1 of the articles that you created is currently tagged as an Unreferenced Biography of a Living Person. The biographies of living persons policy requires that all personal or potentially controversial information be sourced. In addition, to ensure verifiability, all biographies should be based on reliable sources. If you were to bring this article up to standards, it would greatly help us with the current 937 article backlog. Once the article is adequately referenced, please remove the {{unreferencedBLP}} tag. Here is the article:
All biographies of living people created after March 18, 2010, must have references.
If you created the article, please don't take offense. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners, or ask at the help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the {{prod blp}} tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within ten days, the article may be deleted, but you can request that it be undeleted when you are ready to add one. SwisterTwistertalk 03:57, 23 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]
File source and copyright licensing problem with File:Tom Wilson Brown.jpg[edit]
File Copyright problem
Thanks for uploading File:Tom Wilson Brown.jpg. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status and its source. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously.
If you did not create this work entirely yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, please add a link to the page from which it was taken, together with a brief restatement of the website's terms of use of its content. If the original copyright holder is a party unaffiliated with the website, that author should also be credited. You will also need to state under what licensing terms it was released. Please refer to the image use policy to learn what files you can or cannot upload on Wikipedia. The page on copyright tags may help you to find the correct tag to use for your file.
Please add this information by editing the image description page. If the necessary information is not added within the next days, the image will be deleted. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem.
Please also check any other files you may have uploaded to make sure they are correctly tagged. Here is
You are invited to join invite to join the WikiProject Latin music, a WikiProject dedicated to improving articles related to music performed in Spanish, Portuguese and languages of Ibero-America. Simply click here to accept! Or, if you're interested in reading more on Latin music, you may want to check out the Latin music portal.
Hello, I'm McSly. Wikipedia is written by people who have a wide diversity of opinions, but we try hard to make sure articles have a neutral point of view. Your recent edit seemed less than neutral to me, so I removed it for now. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. McSly (talk) 01:19, 27 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Hello, I'm Egghead06. I noticed that you made a change to an article, My Way, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so! If you need guidance on referencing, please see the referencing for beginners tutorial, or if you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Egghead06 (talk) 08:17, 22 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Please stop adding unsourced content, as you did to My Way. This contravenes Wikipedia's policy on verifiability. If you continue to do so, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Please add verifying sources before re-adding - thanks.Egghead06 (talk) 08:19, 22 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Disambiguation link notification for August 29[edit]
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited The Family Man (1979 film), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Thomas Gallagher. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:57, 29 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Hello, Julio Puentes. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
Disambiguation link notification for April 28[edit]
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Madhouse (1990 film), you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Malibu and Doctor. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:07, 28 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Wikipedia editor Boleyn just reviewed your page, and wrote this note for you:
Thanks for taking the time and trouble to create this - it's appreciated. It's now been reviewed and has had some improvement tags added. If you have the time, could you look it over and see if you can help address any of the issues raised in the tags? Thanks again for your hard work.
Plot descriptions cannot be copied from other sources, including official sources and IMDb, unless these can be verified to be public domain or licensed compatibly with Wikipedia. They must be written in original language to comply with Wikipedia's copyright policy. — Diannaa🍁 (talk) 18:35, 22 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]
I've just tagged the page, using our page curation tools, as having some issues to fix. Kindly add reception, and criticism. It is a good practice to use some other article of a film as a reference. Thanks.
The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, you can leave a comment on my talk page. Or, for more editing help, talk to the volunteers at the Teahouse.
—usernamekiran(talk) 15:01, 25 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Wolfgang Dircks until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. agtx 16:27, 14 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks for uploading File:14 baddayatriverbend.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. Even if you created the image yourself, you still need to release it so Wikipedia can use it. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you made this image yourself, you can use copyright tags like {{PD-self}} (to release all rights), {{self|CC-by-sa-3.0|GFDL}} (to require that you be credited), or any tag here - just go to the image, click edit, and add one of those. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.
For more information on using images, see the following pages:
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. CHRISSYMAD❯❯❯¯\_(ツ)_/¯ 18:27, 29 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Hello, Julio Puentes. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
Disambiguation link notification for December 21[edit]
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Curly Howard, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page New Yorker (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:23, 21 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]
A page you started (¡México Por Siempre!) has been reviewed![edit]
Wikipedia editor Abishe just reviewed your page, and wrote this note for you:
Hello Julio Puentes: Enjoy the holiday season, and thanks for your work to maintain, improve and expand Wikipedia. Cheers, Abishe (talk) 03:57, 24 December 2017 (UTC)
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Eric Edwards (actor, born 1966) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Narutolovehinata5tccsdnew 04:49, 11 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.
A tag has been placed on Eric Edwards (actor, born 1966), requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G4 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion discussion, such as at Articles for deletion. When a page has substantially identical content to that of a page deleted after a discussion, and any changes in the content do not address the reasons for which the material was previously deleted, it may be deleted at any time.
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Narutolovehinata5tccsdnew 04:17, 28 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Eric Edwards (actor, born 1966) (2nd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. — Diannaa🍁 (talk) 15:14, 30 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Some of the material you included in this article was copied directly from another website, and thus was a copyright violation. Please don't add copyright material to Wikipedia. — Diannaa🍁 (talk) 15:16, 30 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]
I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Caló (band) for deletion, because the article doesn't clearly say why the subject is important enough to be included in an encyclopedia.
If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.
You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions.
Hello, I'm Evil Idiot. I noticed that you created an article about Sal Ponti, but I decided to tag this page for deletion. There's only one source which is IMDB, and it's not reliable. Even though Ponti appeared in George Pal's film Atlantis, the Lost Continent, he didn't appear in any more films in leading roles. He only appeared in a relativity small number of films in minor roles. It also fails GNG and WP:NCORP. Evil Idiot (talk) 14:14, 31 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Hi, I'm Boleyn. Julio Puentes, thanks for creating Papá Soltero!
I've just tagged the page, using our page curation tools, as having some issues to fix. Please add clear references.
The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, you can leave a comment on my talk page. Or, for more editing help, talk to the volunteers at the Teahouse.
I have contacted you three times but you have continued to edit yet not replied. It is policy that you must respond if other editors raise concerns (see WP:CONDUCT and WP:DISPUTE). Please respond. Boleyn (talk) 19:17, 3 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Julio, thanks for your message. I see you did reply to one of my messages, but there have been several unanswered going back to December, including on La Unión (band). Can you please look over your talk page and respond to my messages? Thanks, Boleyn (talk) 06:48, 4 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Julio, thanks for your message saying you would like help understanding where you are going wrong. Firstly, please respond to messages -n just a quick message like 'I'll work on it' means the New Page Patroller knows it's in hand.
You've continued to edit but not responded or addressed the issues - can you please add your references? If you are struggling, just say so, we'll help, but ignoring messages isn't an option. Boleyn (talk) 20:24, 20 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Hello. I wanted to let you know that your recent edit(s) to the King Ralph plot summary have been removed because they added a significant amount of unnecessary detail. Please avoid excessive detail and high word counts when editing plot summaries/synopses. You may read the plot summaryedit guides to learn more about contributing constructively to plot summaries/synopses. There are also specific guidelines for films, musicals, television episodes, anime/manga, novels and non-fiction books. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. DonIago (talk) 04:56, 21 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Julio, I've sent you thirteen messages explaining the importance of sourcing, and linking to Help:Referencing for beginners, the WP:TEAHOUSE (where you can get help) and WP:V. I have also pointed out that communication is required when another editor raises a concern, per WP:CONDUCT and WP:DISPUTE. You are risking a block by refusing to do these things. Can you please add your references to the articles, or tell me what your sources were and I'll happily help?
You have been creating articles on Wikipedia steadily for nine years - we really need to get this sorted and are happy to help - please just communicate. Best wishes,Boleyn (talk) 06:57, 24 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Copying your response at my talk page so whole conversation is together:
Hello, sorry for being a bit lazy, it's just that the whole bureaucracy of Wikipedia can honestly be too much of a hassle at times. --Julio P. 08:51, 25 June 2018 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Julio Puentes (talk • contribs)
Julio, I wouldn't say that answering people when they send you messages, or having sources in encyclopaedia articles, is bureaucracy. Will you answer my previous messages? Will you add sources to the articles you've created? In future, will you answer if other editors express a concern and will you add sources to your creations? Thanks, Boleyn (talk) 11:06, 29 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]
You left this message at my talk page: Excuse me, but what is it exactly that you want? I've put the necessary references and tried to include as much information as possible on the articles. I really don't know what else to do. Julio P. 04:57, 1 July 2018 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Julio Puentes (talk • contribs)
You have not added the necessary references. I think I've been explicit in what I'm asking: Will you answer my previous messages (see them above on your talk page - this is now my fifteenth message to you trying to sort this out)? Will you add sources to the articles you've created? In future, will you answer if other editors express a concern and will you add sources to your creations? This is a list of your unreferenced creations: Papá Soltero, The Family Man (1979 film), Pimpinela, Avalanche (1999 film) and La Unión (band). Please bear in mind it must be a reliable source, not imdb.
In addition, if you look at a list of your creations, you'll see most of them have been tagged for refimprove and/or notability, or redirected as not notable [1]. It would be best if you submitted future creations through WP:AFC, where someone can help you. Can you please answer my questions? Thanks for replying, Boleyn (talk) 05:42, 1 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]
You've continued to edit but not respond. You are risking a block by this behaviour. Please respond and address the issues raised. Boleyn (talk) 20:34, 3 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]
This is my eighteenth message, and this discussion has still gone nowhere. If you need help, just ask. Continuing to igmore messages and not address the issue is not acceptable. Boleyn (talk) 18:33, 15 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Julio, please read WP:Communication is required. If you are doing things that are causing problems with other editors, and you will not either 1) stop, or 2) communicate on the article talk page about the issue, you will be blocked from editing. This is true for everyone at Wikipedia. I strongly suggest you read and reply at that ANI. Dennis Brown - 2¢ 15:05, 16 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]
You've continued to eidt - please join the discussion at WP:ANI. Boleyn (talk) 08:08, 25 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Julio: I saw the section at AN/I and I have seen your posts at Boleyn's user talk, so I thought maybe it would be helpful if I explained what you need to do in different words. So this will repeat what Boleyn has been saying. Some of this may be different on other language Wikipedias, but if so, it's probably more a matter of emphasis and ways things are usually done than of basic rules and guidelines.
New articles need to have references. That makes it possible for readers to check the information in the article, and read more if they want to ("verifiability"). It also shows that the topic is "notable" as we define it, which is almost always "other people have written about it". (The exceptions are obviously notable things like Nobel Prize winners and oceans.) References almost always take the form of footnotes: things you put into the article using <ref> and </ref> tags. (A very few articles use lists of sources instead, and you can have one external link such as IMDb, but basically, new page patrollers are looking for footnotes. Plus IMDb is useless for establishing notability and can't be trusted as a reference for information; we only include it because readers like to see the link.)
Now look at Papá soltero. You created that article with two edits, and this is how it looked after you saved the second edit: [2]. It has no sources. Not even an IMDb link. The one footnote is the word "Creat". You should have had two footnotes saying where you got your information from. Instead, even when you came back to the article, all you added was a wikilink on an actor's name (a red link): [3]. And that was your last edit to the article. I searched like crazy and was able to find one reference I could add, in this edit: [4]. You have big advantages over me in looking for references. You know the show and you speak the language the coverage is likely to be in, so you can do a better search than I was able to. You may even have access to printed back copies of newspapers and magazines that are not on-line. (Off-line sources are fine; just give full information: author, title, name of the newspaper, book, or magazine, full date and page number.) But it is your job to do that with every new article you create. At least two sources. See this page.
A second example: The Family Man (1979 film). When you finished creating it in two edits, it looked like this: [5]. No references whatsoever. Just one line and an infobox. That article was lucky it didn't get deleted. Instead, several other Wikipedians spent time working on it; again, other people even had to add the IMDb and categories for you. But this time, when I looked, I found a wonderful source: a review in the New York Times. That made it possible for me to expand the article a lot. Here is my edit. As my summary for my other edit to the article notes, I also found a second source, but I couldn't use it because it's preserved on newspapers.com and I don't have a subscription. How did you get the idea to write up that film? You presumably read about it somewhere? You need to put that source, whatever it is, and a second one, as footnotes when you create an article.
I hope this helps you understand? If you can't do the markup for footnotes when you're editing using the mobile interface, then save creating new articles for when you aren't on mobile (or use the regular wiki-editor on your mobile phone; here's an essay about how to do that.) But that's what you need to add to your old articles, and always to your new ones. Yngvadottir (talk) 16:05, 26 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]
I have indefinitely blocked your account due to your refusal to respond to the exhaustive messages and attempts to communicate with you. You've been repeatedly made aware that communication is mandatory, you've been repeatedly made aware that a discussion at ANI about you was ongoing, and you've demonstrated that you're capable of communicating, which tells me that you're intentionally choosing not to. Sorry, but this is not something we will tolerate and you've been given more than enough time to start communicating voluntarily. If you would like to continue editing here, no problem, but first you need to read WP:COMMUNICATE and WP:V, and indicate that you thoroughly understand them. If you have any questions, you may communicate them to us, so we can answer them for you. When you have done so, follow the instructions at the guide to appealing blocks and we will gladly unblock you without issue. Swarm♠ 03:49, 7 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Swarm, this editor seems to have just set himself up as Mr. Julio Puentes to avoid the block. Thanks, Boleyn (talk) 20:12, 5 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
An article you recently created, Brothers of the Wind, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Atlantic306 (talk) 22:57, 8 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]
If you created the article, please don't be offended. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners, or ask at the help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the {{prod blp/dated}} tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within seven days, the article may be deleted, but you can request that it be undeleted when you are ready to add one. CommanderWaterford (talk) 11:51, 23 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Hello, Julio Puentes. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Brothers of the Wind, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Draft space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for article space.
If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion under CSD G13. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it. You may request userfication of the content if it meets requirements.
If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available here.
Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 01:03, 22 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]
This is the last warning you will receive for your disruptive edits. 
Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on edit warring. The thread is Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring#User:Julio_Puentes reported by User:McSly (Result: ). Thank you. McSly (talk) 02:30, 27 January 2016 (UTC)
Please stop adding unsourced content, as you did to My Way. This contravenes Wikipedia's policy on verifiability. If you continue to do so, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Please add verifying sources before re-adding - thanks. Egghead06 (talk) 08:19, 22 May 2016 (UTC)
.jpg)
.jpg)
,_cropped.jpg)
