User talk:Jtalledo/Archive 1

Queens County Farm Museum

Regarding the "Queens County Farm Museum" that you placed in Floral Park, New York, I think the museum is actually in Queens County. FP is in Nassau County. Why don't you check this out further and correct as needed. Hint: if you read the FP article, you will see that the part of Queens near FP is also called FP. Stepp-Wulf 04:25, 10 Dec 2004 (UTC)

Actually, being from the area I was under the same impression as well. But the official web site of the museum lists its address as:

Queens County Farm Museum

73-50 Little Neck Parkway

Floral Park, New York 11004-1129

That's why I figured it was actually in Floral Park. The whole Queens County/Nassau County line gets a little muddled around the Jericho Turnpike/Jamaica Avenue area, so I understand the confusion. Double-checking some facts, it does seem that it is in Queens County (quite fittingly I might add). I should have removed the reference by the time you read this post. Cheers. - Jtalledo 05:24, 10 Dec 2004 (UTC)

WikiProject New York City

Hello, I've started WikiProject New York City, and from your edits it seems you might be interested. See its talk page for the beginning of a discussion on the standardization of neighborhood names, and bringing New York City up to featured status.--Pharos 13:23, 29 Dec 2004 (UTC)

WikiProject Professional Wrestling

Thanks to Gwalla | Talk, WikiProject Professional Wrestling is now open for business! and as you are contributing much to wrestling articles i thought you would like to know. --- Paulley 17:55, 22 Mar 2005 (UTC)

User:24.60.128.48

If that user has been vandalizing pages, I guess the best thing to do would be to list him under Vandalism in Progress. I think I already did this a while ago. Other than that, I don't see what else we can do. Dave the Red (talk) 02:44, Apr 6, 2005 (UTC)

So did I. Ah well. No big deal. --Jtalledo (talk) 02:46, 6 Apr 2005 (UTC)

Questionable images

Copied from User talk:Jtalledo: Jtalledo, the proper course of action would first be to chill out. You seem to be on a witchhunt here. Okay, I'll admit I've added some pics of my favorite celebs shirtless, but I don't think it counts as vandalism. If any of the pics were inappropriate, then I apologize -- however, just because a pic "doesn't add much to an article," doesn't connote ill intention, and certainly not vandalism. I think you should just calm down and get a hold of yourself. I've done work on other articles that do not include just adding shirtless pics. And I haven't removed other pics from the same articles, as you have alleged in other places on the site. You might in the future contact someone through their Talk page if you wish to discuss something with them, instead of putting libelous talk about them around the site. I'm sure some might consider you an asset to Wikipedia, but you may wish to come down off your high horse, and brush up on your etiquette before going any further.Inhighspeed 00:13, 12 July 2005 (UTC)

Furthermore, according to Wikipedia etiquette, you are supposed to notify someone on their Talk page if you put up an image of theirs for deletion, which you did not do. By the way, you sure seem to spend a lot of your time criticizing and editing what others do. I guess it's easier to find fault with others than with ourselves.Inhighspeed 01:32, 12 July 2005 (UTC)

Thanks for your reply. First of all, I apologize for neglecting to notify you about my edits. As you can see, I notified you about one of the images I changed the tags on. I'm not a big fan of having many images on articles and I was unaware of your intentions with these images. You could just as easily have found other pictures, but you chose to use those for whatever reason. But I do extremely resent your claim that I'm on a "high horse". Say what you want about what I do, but personal attacks are very counterproductive, especially considering I never made any personal attacks against you. I merely was wondering what the proper thing to do was and now you've provided me with that answer. I do hope we can settle any future conflicts in a more civil manner and I promise to keep in better contact with you and other users about these issues. Thank you very much and happy editing!:) --Jtalledo (talk) 21:49, 12 July 2005 (UTC)

I agree with you, the user is adding numerous questionable images, especially for articles that aren't long enough to warrant two in the first place. --Madchester 06:50, July 13, 2005 (UTC)

WNBA Arenas

As it seems you have a lot of familiarity with the WNBA (and you probably know what you're doing more than I do :-D ), I'd like to make a suggestion. I was wondering if a template of all of the current arenas used by the teams in the WNBA could be created and put on their appropriate pages, much in the style of the NBA, NHL, NFL, MLS, & MLB. Eric 20:21, September 4, 2005 (UTC)

I'm not exactly sure about the "arenas" part, but if you're talking about something like Template:NBA, Template:NFL and Template:MLB, that would be a great idea and I'll make one. --Jtalledo (talk) 03:18, 5 September 2005 (UTC)

Okay. It should be done for now. I added all the WNBA Arenas template to all the arenas that are home to WNBA teams but I still have to add the WNBA teams template to all the WNBA team pages. By the way, thanks for making the corrections to the templates. :) --Jtalledo (talk) 21:46, 7 September 2005 (UTC)

Nitwitts

People who write articles have a right to vote, just as the nominator does. Even if you take out the anon, it's only 2-1. If you want to put it up for another vote, go ahead, but I stand behind my decisions. --Woohookitty 04:21, 8 September 2005 (UTC)

Okay Charlie, but counting me and not counting the anonymous user, it was 3-1. But hey, it's your call. --Jtalledo (talk) 04:24, 8 September 2005 (UTC)

Cheryl Miller

Why did you tag Cheryl Miller as needing cleanup? It looks fine to me. RADICALBENDER★ 05:31, September 10, 2005 (UTC)

The article is hard to read - it needs to be broken up into sections. I'll make some edits. --Jtalledo (talk) 13:37, 10 September 2005 (UTC)

Image:Agent Pleakley.gif has been listed for deletion

I have no problem with its deletion. I place the image there to add more life to the page and more detail to the Character's profile, there's a replacement image that's fine with me. Thank you for updating me!! (LordBleen 03:14, 19 September 2005 (UTC))

Joe Paterno Image

You marked it as "no source" and it was deleted. As the person who uploaded the pic, it would've been nice had someone notified me. I reuploaded it with the proper tag. AriGold 15:11, 11 October 2005 (UTC)

Not sure if that was a sincere apology or not. If it was, thanks. If not, thanks for at least responding. AriGold 15:30, 11 October 2005 (UTC)

Cool, thanks. AriGold 16:45, 11 October 2005 (UTC)

What's wrong with "teenagerish"?

On the Amy Rose page, why the change? I mean, "Teenagerish" sounds much cuter and fitting to Amy's character than plain-old "teenager-like". Rethink this, please. >> Judacris 12:20, 13 October 2005 (UTC)

John Layfield article

Thanks for restoring the article back to the APA days. I was in the middle of searching through the article's history when you repaired it. I can't believe it's been weeks and nobody noticed it. --LBMixPro^{(Speak on it!)} 22:56, 14 October 2005 (UTC)

Re: Requested Move - Bob and Doug McKenzie

I have dealt with your request to have these articles sorted out:

• The main article now resides at Bob and Doug McKenzie
• Bob & Doug McKenzie redirects to Bob and Doug McKenzie
• The redirect page Bob andDoug McKenzie was deleted

Please let me know if there's anything else I need to do, or if I misinterpreted what was required. Rob Church ^{Talk | FAHD} 13:57, 17 October 2005 (UTC)

WNBA (disambiguation)

Please see Talk:WNBA (disambiguation) as I have moved the discussion there. Misterrick 20:42, 27 October 2005 (UTC)