User talk:Josh1872

March 2021[edit]

Hello and welcome to Wikipedia. Constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, but a recent edit of yours to the page Gender has an edit summary that appears to be inaccurate or inappropriate. The summaries are helpful to people browsing an article's history, so it is important that you use edit summaries that accurately tell other editors what you did. Feel free to use the sandbox to make test edits. Thank you. warmly, ezlev. talk 19:09, 14 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Gender. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been or will be reverted.

If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively, you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant noticeboards.
If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continued disruptive editing may result in loss of editing privileges. Thank you. warmly, ezlev. talk 19:10, 14 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent editing history at Gender shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See the bold, revert, discuss cycle for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you do not violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. Tgeorgescu (talk) 19:11, 14 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.

You have shown interest in any gender-related dispute or controversy and associated people. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called discretionary sanctions is in effect. Any administrator may impose sanctions on editors who do not strictly follow Wikipedia's policies, or the page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic.

For additional information, please see the guidance on discretionary sanctions and the Arbitration Committee's decision here. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.

Funcrunch (talk) 20:02, 14 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

FTP #55🏆 Josh1872 (talk) 16:09, 15 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Kenny McLean. Giant Snowman 20:42, 26 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Didn’t vandalise anything wee man he’s said himself Josh1872 (talk) 23:55, 26 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

April 2021[edit]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you add unsourced material to Wikipedia, as you did at Alan McInally. Giant Snowman 17:29, 2 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

With a name like snowman you should be blocked. Also it’s true that he’s been a reporter on FIFA 13-21 so I suggest you change that back. Josh1872 (talk) 17:54, 2 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

You need to find a much better source Tham IMDB. If you make that edit again you will be blocked. Giant Snowman 18:02, 2 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

🤣🤣🤣 Josh1872 (talk) 18:04, 2 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]