User talk:Josephgallos

Replaceable fair use File:Wildsmith's Piccadilly Oxford Shoes.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:Wildsmith's Piccadilly Oxford Shoes.jpg. I noticed that this file is being used under a claim of fair use. However, I think that the way it is being used fails the first non-free content criterion. This criterion states that files used under claims of fair use may have no free equivalent; in other words, if the file could be adequately covered by a freely-licensed file or by text alone, then it may not be used on Wikipedia. If you believe this file is not replaceable, please:

1. Go to the file description page and add the text {{di-replaceable fair use disputed|<your reason>}} below the original replaceable fair use template, replacing <your reason> with a short explanation of why the file is not replaceable.
2. On the file discussion page, write a full explanation of why you believe the file is not replaceable.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace this non-free media item by finding freely licensed media of the same subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or similar) media under a free license, or by creating new media yourself (for example, by taking your own photograph of the subject).

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified how these media fully satisfy our non-free content criteria. You can find a list of description pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that even if you follow steps 1 and 2 above, non-free media which could be replaced by freely licensed alternatives will be deleted 2 days after this notification (7 days if uploaded before 13 July 2006), per the non-free content policy. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. --Bloonstdfan360 / talk / contribs 05:05, 20 October 2013 (UTC)

October 2013

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Savile Row may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

• bespoke-saville-row-tailoring-at-its-best Bespoke Savile Row Tailoring At It's Best]</ref><ref>[http://www.fashionreview.co.uk/cad-and-the-dandy-fashion/ Cad & the Dandy Fashion - Savile Row</ref>

Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 12:04, 24 October 2013 (UTC)

File permission problem with File:Cad and the Dandy Logo updated version.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:Cad and the Dandy Logo updated version.jpg. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file has agreed to release it under the given license.

If you are the copyright holder for this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either

• make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
• Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en@wikimedia.org, stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here. If you take this step, add {{OTRS pending}} to the file description page to prevent premature deletion.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to permissions-en@wikimedia.org.

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:File copyright tags#Fair use, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See Wikipedia:File copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. You may wish to read the Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 12:16, 24 October 2013 (UTC)

File permission problem with File:Cad and the Dandy Shop.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:Cad and the Dandy Shop.jpg. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file has agreed to release it under the given license.

If you are the copyright holder for this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either

• make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
• Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en@wikimedia.org, stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here. If you take this step, add {{OTRS pending}} to the file description page to prevent premature deletion.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to permissions-en@wikimedia.org.

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:File copyright tags#Fair use, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See Wikipedia:File copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. You may wish to read the Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 12:22, 24 October 2013 (UTC)

Vandal1/WP:BIAS - Cad and the Dandy

Hello, I'm Trident13. I wanted to let you know that I undid one or more of your recent contributions to Cad and the Dandy because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks! Please also read out notes on WP:BIAS, as your editorial record suggest a very close association with the Cad and the Dandy. Rgds, --Trident13 (talk) 17:10, 12 January 2014 (UTC)

Hi Trident13. It is not my edits that does not look constructive. You've actually edited the article twice. First, you made some sentences/paragraphs look like spam and then second, you deleted them. If you will read my original edits, you'll see that it is relevant, constructive and important information. My edits are also unbiased. What I've added are undeniable, factual information supported by reliable published references. I am reverting this back to the original version before your 2 edits. Joseph — Preceding unsigned comment added by Josephgallos (talk • contribs) 04:29, 13 January 2014 (UTC)

Thank you for your message. I note with interest that you have not answered my qustion re your association with the Cad and the Dandy? I have again today reeditted the article, removing unreferenced/claimed "facts" and biased statements, including:

• • • "at a lower price than the more traditional Savile Row houses." (unref'd)
    • "Both having family connections to the tailoring industry" (unref'd)
    • "The store is the first on the iconic tailoring street to hand weave a cloth before making it up into a fully finished suit" (only states claimed in ref)
    • "With Britain’s bespoke tailoring industry facing an alarming shortage of master tailors..." (blatant bias verging on advert; no ref. Also igores the fact that C&D have hence operate outside the Row's own apprenticeship scheme - should this not be mentioned?)

I have also made notes to this effect also on the articles talk page. Rgds, --Trident13 (talk) 16:18, 13 January 2014 (UTC)

Vandal2 - Cad and the Dandy: Anon/socket puppet editting

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Cad and the Dandy. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Administrators can block users from editing if they repeatedly vandalize. Thank you. Please also do not use anon-editting/sock puppetry to "validate" your position. Rgds, --Trident13 (talk) 10:14, 15 January 2014 (UTC)

Commercial associations to The Cad and the Dandy

I note that from various sources 1 1 that you are the commercially retained SEO consultant for the Cad and the Dandy. Secondly, tracing the IP address of User:124.6.181.81 using Overlords tool shows that they come from Makati City, Philippines the same location as yourself. Can you please immediately read our guidelines on WP:BIAS before making any further edits to the article. Then, when you calm down and actually enage on the debate, and stop using sock-puppetry to support your position, perhaps we can make some progress? (Notes copied to articles talkpage) Rgds, --Trident13 (talk) 10:30, 15 January 2014 (UTC)

Your wannabee Sherlock Holmes stuff is a failure. First, you don't need to track the IP address as the username already indicate the real name. Second, if I want to hide, why would I use my real name as my username and use my own IP? I could use a codename like NeptuneSpear13, etc and use a nice virtual private network located somewhere in the world to become anonymous. You are using a codename? Why are you afraid to sign with your real name?

What I did was revert your changes which is a clear sabotage attempt as first you attack the information and when you failed to prove your point, you went on to attacking the person. And how about your association with Chester Barrie?

Vandal3 - Cad and the Dandy

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Cad and the Dandy, you may be blocked from editing. In light of your revert to an advertorial version of the text, now self-admitted bias re this article, and failure to engage in the process. Rgds, --Trident13 (talk) 11:17, 17 January 2014 (UTC)

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. Rgds, --Trident13 (talk) 10:21, 18 January 2014 (UTC)

Joseph, I told Trident not to call you a vandal, please don't call him one. You're both trying to improve the encyclopedia - talk out the article issues without characterizing the other editor. Thanks. --SarekOfVulcan (talk) 16:19, 18 January 2014 (UTC)

File:Cad & the Dandy Logo.jpg listed for discussion

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Cad & the Dandy Logo.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination.

ATTENTION: This is an automated, bot-generated message. This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 23:50, 3 January 2017 (UTC)