User talk:JiroDreamsOfMcRibs

June 2016[edit]

Hi, and thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. Your recent talk page comments on User talk:Passengerpigeon were not added to the bottom of the page. New discussion page messages and topics should always be added to the bottom. Your message may have been moved. In the future you can use the "New section" link in the top right. For more details see the talk page guidelines. Thank you. Passengerpigeon (talk) 04:44, 12 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome, and thank you for your attempt to lighten up Wikipedia. However, this is an encyclopedia and the articles are intended to be serious, so please don't make joke edits, as you did to User talk:Passengerpigeon. Readers looking for accurate information will not find them amusing. If you'd like to experiment with editing, please use the sandbox instead, where you are given a certain degree of freedom in what you write. You cannot be a sockpuppet of DavidYork71, Starship9000, and Supreme Genghis Khan at the same time as that is technically impossible. If this was a joke edit, please see WP:WELCOME and contribute constructively from now on. Passengerpigeon (talk) 04:47, 12 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Unblock[edit]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

JiroDreamsOfMcRibs (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I am sorry for what I absolutely did wrong I promise you guys I will contribute constructively and not make any stupid edits. I will not admit to be a sock of anybody and I will learn from what I absolutely did wrong. Thanks admins and I would like to be unblocked so I can contribute instead of making dumpster fire edits. Thanks, --JiroDreamsOfMcRibs (talk) 19:42, 23 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

"I will not admit to be a sock of anybody". You don't have to admit it, we know you are. As such, unblock request denied. Please make the request with your original account. Yamla (talk) 19:44, 23 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

JiroDreamsOfMcRibs (talk) 19:42, 23 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

JiroDreamsOfMcRibs (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Your understanding of unblocking is silly as your defense of McCarthy. It does not matter which account you use. So I would like to be unblocked and make useful edits. Thanks!

Decline reason:

Technical evidence confirms the abuse of multiple accounts. Mike V • Talk 19:55, 23 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.