User talk:Jh.daniell

Welcome!

Hello, Jh.daniell, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome!

--SCHZMO ✍ 13:53, 21 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

thanks for your work on Empress Myeongseong. however, i'm concerned that this article is already way too long, and, more importantly, lacks inline citations. i tried to trim the wording a bit, so that the historical background is briefly summarized, and the article can become a concise biography of the person. as it is, i hope to reduce the bulk of the article by moving chunks into other more relevant history articles, once the original author adds inline citations.

since you seem to be much more knowledgeable than me about this period, could you add details and citations at articles like Korean Empire? i think the current versions of this period at Joseon Dynasty has some errors too. & the amount of information in myeongseong is way out of proportion compared to Daewon-gun Silhak and Treaty of Ganghwa, for example. we don't even have an article for Gapsin Jeongbyeon.

my point is that you will have more of an impact on readers and the quality of wikipedia if knowledgeable editors focus first on the more general articles that more people will see, and work to balance the growth of other articles which are now in pretty embarrassing shape. thanks. Appleby 16:22, 15 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Jh.daniell, if you don't mind, I'll do a little grammatical and phrasing editting on your otherwise very nice contribution to Empress Myeongseong. I second Appleby's comments about needing some related topics expanded. In particular, I'd like to see more on both Silhak and Donghak. Right now the only context for Donghak is the peasant rebellion in Cholla do in the 1880s. We need historical and geographic context for that - for example, what is it about Cholla do that would result in rebellions - or political protesters like Kim Daejoong? My wife is related to the Chinan Chun clan, and they tell the story that their name used to be Wang, ie King, until they were forced out of power, so they put on hats (look at the character for Chun - it's Wang with a hat) and moved down to Cholla do in disgrace and shame. --Dan 16:34, 15 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

daniell, contributors to wikipedia simply need to let go of the natural sense of ownership of our own edits. re your work on Korean Empire, it is simply wikipedia's policy to name articles by common english names. thus, South Korea, not Republic of Korea. there's no way around this, unless you first get consensus to change the basic wikipedia-wide policy. there are some exceptions, but i don't see what exception applies here.

while i am glad to see korean history articles receive attention and much-needed content, i am concerned that so much material is being added without inline citations. without links to sources that others can check, there will be no way to defend any content if challenged by other editors at any time, & all your work may be for naught.

also, please note that roman transcription is primary, & foreign scripts are usually not needed except for the article subject. please see other korea-related articles for examples. there are other stylistic edits that we all have to accept, once we put our work into this encyclopedia "that anyone can edit." please do not revert for the sake of reverting. please use the discussion pages (e.g. Talk:Korean Empire) to discuss further. thanks. Appleby 18:36, 16 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Got it.--Jh.daniell 14:12, 17 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Korean maps[edit]

After your request for a base map, K. Hilker was very good to provide one he created at [1]. He told me, "This is a self-made file so feel free to use it, chop it, redistribute it as you wish." Yeu Ninje 09:06, 8 July 2006 (UTC)--Khilker 03:57, 10 July 2006 (UTC) (updated URL)[reply]

WP:RM poll at Talk:Dokdo#Requested Move May 2007[edit]

There is a new poll for Dokdo at Talk:Dokdo#Requested Move May 2007. The candidates for a new name include Liancourt Rocks, Takeshima, and the new Takeshima/Dokdo variations suggested by user:Macgruder. You are being informed because you voted on the last poll. Thank you.--Endroit 22:02, 21 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open![edit]

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:57, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of File:Eight provinces.jpg[edit]

The file File:Eight provinces.jpg has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

unused, low-res, no obvious use

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 01:02, 10 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]