User talk:Jgbook2007

Welcome!

Hello, Jgbook2007, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome! Gamaliel 02:17, 13 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Dec. 31, 2010 edits[edit]

Your edits today are being reverted, as they all violate multiple Wikipedia policies and guidelines, the most important of which is that all content be verified through reliable source citations. As well, edits must be written in an encyclopedic WP:TONE. A less important but still significant issue is to follow the Wikipedia Manual of Style for grammar and punctuation. Making a host of multiple-vio edits across a range of articles does a disservice to other editors and to the encyclopedia. As the notice above has said since 2006, please familiarize yourself with at least some of the Wikipedia basics before editing. In the meantime, until you can properly cite your addition, please do not continue to add it, as that will be interpreted as non-constructive editing that can result in admin intervention. --Tenebrae (talk) 02:35, 31 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I can't say strongly enough that you cannot write things in Wikipedia like

...where he had been watching MJ from a private box in the theater every night,using his underground-found wealth to pay for the tickets (comparisons to The Phantom Of The Opera as per this set-up are , well...inevitable!)."

as you did at Mole Man. --Tenebrae (talk) 02:38, 31 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Roy Thomas as well. Nightscream (talk) 03:14, 31 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Mutt & Jeff[edit]

In response to your posting on on talk page today, the reasons for the deletion there are noted above. In all seriousness, if there's any way to explain Wikipedia policy in regards to your edits in any more detail, please let me know what I can answer or how I can help. --Tenebrae (talk) 20:14, 24 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

May 2014[edit]

Hello, I'm GeorgeLouis. I noticed that you made a change to an article, The San Francisco Examiner, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so! If you need guidance on referencing, please see the referencing for beginners tutorial, or if you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. GeorgeLouis (talk) 18:56, 26 May 2014 (

...Is this the way to answer you ?

 I saw that Reno NV edition of the San Francisco Examiner I cited with the day before's news content of the San Francisco Examiner but that day's dated syndicated content when I was in Reno during the late 90s and bought it there, noting the difference from and similarity to the day before's San Francisco edition of the Ex, on multiple occasions. However, I don't have copies of 15-yr old newspapers handy! What would satisfy you? Jgbook2007 (talk) 10:10, 14 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]