User talk:Jeremytrewindixon

Welcome

Hello Jeremytrewindixon, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions, they have helped improve Wikipedia and make it more informative. I hope you enjoy using Wikipedia and decide to make additional contributions. Some resources to help new Wikipedians include:

How to edit a page

Editing tutorial

Picture tutorial

How to write a great article

Naming conventions

Manual of Style

As a contributor to Australian articles, you may like to connect with other Australian Wikipedians through the Australian Wikipedians' notice board and take a look at the activities in Wikipedia:WikiProject Australia and associated sub-projects.

Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes ~~~~; this will automatically produce your name and the date.

If you have any questions, please see Wikipedia:Where to ask a question, try the Wikipedia:Help desk, or ask me on my talk page. Or you can just type {{helpme}} on your user page, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions.

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Thank you for signing up!

Hope I can help at the article. I may be able to find a couple of book references, I think that external links to reliable sources is fine until they are redundant. You could also put them on a talk page with a bit of commentary. Hope you enjoy editing here. Regards, ☻ Fred|☝ discussion|✍ contributions 07:52, 3 July 2007 (UTC)

Hi, Jeremytrewindixon. Please add a word or two to your userpage, this will stop it appearing as a red link. I've been thinking about an article on A in A for a while, good work kicking it off. Hopefully others will be prompted to make other improvements. I must dig up some references. Regards, ☻ Fred|☝ discussion|✍ contributions 10:16, 8 July 2007 (UTC)

Marie Bjelke Peterson

I think I fixed it with a redirect. Tell me what you think. Ursasapien (talk) 08:28, 24 July 2007 (UTC)

Another redirect and now I think I have fixed it. See Marie Bjelke Petersen

You are doing some good work on her. I have added a Public Domain photo (will submit to the NLA the formal paperwork they like - though have discussed it in principle with them). Hope you don't mind that I've reformatted your Alexander footnotes to be the same as the other footnotes in the article. Let me know if you disagree. Cheers Sterry2607 12:00, 1 October 2007 (UTC)

Marie Pitt

Yes, that's her. I haven't had time to start anything and would appreciate it if you did. Owen 13:36, 23 August 2007 (UTC)

Set up Marie Pitt stub a few weeks ago. Jeremytrewindixon 03:44, 18 October 2007 (UTC)

Monty Miller

Saw your talk page comments there. I have nothing to add and so have added nothing but thought you might like to feel that the ether you were putting your views into was not entirely a vacuum. Regards --Golden Wattle ^talk 07:08, 10 September 2007 (UTC)

Are you suggesting that there is no reference to Miller residing in WA? [1] Cygnis insignis 12:10, 30 September 2007 (UTC)

No, not at all, far from it. Just that sources are not very clear when he was where. Jeremytrewindixon 10:41, 1 October 2007 (UTC) And in particular he seems to have been living in Melbourne when the Melbourne Anarchist Club was founded, but I believe I've seen it stated that he was living in WA alreadya t that time....there's no doubt that he eventually moved to WA and was important in the AKL there as the page on him Monty Miller notes. Jeremytrewindixon 10:46, 1 October 2007 (UTC)

I missed that, pardon me. Great job with the expansion. I think I know where to find some WA info, it will take some digging though. I will post it on the talk page, you can work it into the prose if you like. Regards, Cygnis insignis 12:26, 1 October 2007 (UTC)

From the review of A in Aus. : Importance stays as low as there is no parliamentry reprentatives. To paraphrase another editor; I'm glad I wasn't sipping my coffee when I read that! :-) Thanks for your outstanding efforts thus far. Regards, Cygnis insignis 17:06, 9 October 2007 (UTC)

3cr contribution

I sometimes, on Thursday mornings, hear yourself on 3cr. It is always enjoyable: interesting, witty and possessed of historical analysis. Please continue your short but valuable broadcasting-many people look forward to it. Lentisco 04:51, 15 October 2007 (UTC)

Yorkshirian

Your name is not listed by the Committee in the "list of parties". Therefore, your statement is located on the talk page. Please do not persist in readding it to the main case page. Daniel (talk) 03:31, 9 July 2008 (UTC)

G'day. If you want to participate in this case, you are more than welcome to submit evidence to the Evidence page, or work with others interested in the case to "Workshop" the outcome of this case. Let me know if you need a hand understanding how to participate on either of those two pages. Cheers, John Vandenberg ^(chat) 03:37, 9 July 2008 (UTC)

Yeah, I worked that out before the messages came, but thanks folks. I have transferred my remarks to the "evidence" page. Jeremy (talk) 03:46, 9 July 2008 (UTC)

GA Reassessment of Robin Hood

As a significant contributor to the article I wanted to make sure you were aware that Robin Hood has been nominated for a good article reassessment. Please leave your comments and help us to return the article to good article quality. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, the good article status will be removed from the article. Reviewers' concerns are here. --Malleus Fatuorum 22:48, 7 August 2009 (UTC) Should note I was temporarily not active on wikipedia when all this happened Jeremy (talk) 10:10, 4 July 2010 (UTC)

A question

Hi Jeremy! I'm writing you because I want to know what means "Nadir point" (it appears in an image uploaded by you Cartesian model of political space). I searched for it in the Internet but found nothing related. Thanks so much.

P.S.: please write your answer in the discussion page. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 81.35.208.27 (talk) 15:32, 20 December 2011 (UTC)

Nadir is the opposite of zenith, hence the lowest point, in this case the point at which the "liberty" (freedom + equality) value was at its lowest as compared to the "zenith" where the liberty value was optimized. Jeremy (talk) 05:36, 21 January 2012 (UTC)

Notification of automated file description generation

Your upload of File:Cartesianmodelofpoliticalspace.gif or contribution to its description is noted, and thanks (even if belatedly) for your contribution. In order to help make better use of the media, an attempt has been made by an automated process to identify and add certain information to the media's description page.

This notification is placed on your talk page because a bot has identified you either as the uploader of the file, or as a contributor to its metadata. It would be appreciated if you could carefully review the information the bot added. To opt out of these notifications, please follow the instructions here. Thanks! Message delivered by Theo's Little Bot (opt-out) 15:04, 16 March 2014 (UTC)

Projected Return to Activity

Just to notify anyone interested that while I ahve been largely missing for the last few years I am planning to devote more time to wikipedia in future. Jeremy (talk) 05:01, 5 June 2014 (UTC)Well again, I am again planning to return to activity, perhaps with with more effect this time. Jeremy (talk) 23:21, 12 June 2015 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 17:32, 23 November 2015 (UTC)

A kitten for you!

wonderful

United kingdoms my home (talk) 23:07, 13 December 2015 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for January 6

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Robyn Hod and the Shryff off Notyngham, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Trinity College. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:37, 6 January 2016 (UTC)

January 2016

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Robin Hood may have broken the syntax by modifying 2 "[]"s and 1 "<>"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

• ], and identifies Maid Marian with "one of the semi-mythical Matildas persecuted by [[King John]]' <ref. Dobson and Taylor 1997 p44]]The plays are complex in plot and form, the story of Robin Hood appearing as a play-within-a-play

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 04:06, 11 January 2016 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for January 14

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Robin Hood, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Joseph Hunter. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:07, 14 January 2016 (UTC)

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, Jeremytrewindixon. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, Jeremytrewindixon. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)

Returning from long absence

For a few life related reasons I've dropped the bundle on editing in the last few years. Hoping to return to it. Very rusty on mechanics and I gather a few things have changed. Jeremy (talk) 10:22, 21 January 2019 (UTC)

ArbCom 2019 election voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:09, 19 November 2019 (UTC)