User talk:Jebr1976a

Welcome!

Hello, Jebr1976a, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on discussion pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{help me}} before the question. Again, welcome!--MollyPollyRolly (talk) 17:27, 30 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This help request has been answered. If you need more help, you can ask another question on your talk page, contact the responding user(s) directly on their user talk page, or consider visiting the Teahouse.

I'm sorry, I don't understand why you reverted my new page. It adds value and I believe it to be objective. How can it be improved? Thank you. Jebr1976a (talk) 17:44, 30 July 2021 (UTC)Jebr1976a[reply]

First of all, I personally didn't revert anything. Second, you're creating an article on a non-notable company, and without sources.--MollyPollyRolly (talk) 17:56, 30 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, the page might not meet the notability guideline, or at the very least, is borderline in terms of notability, consider looking at WP:1st, peer review can be a great way of making sure your draft doesn't get removed in the future. Justi yaya 17:59, 30 July 2021 (UTC) (Ping for reverter PrincessPersnickety)[reply]

I included 15-20 sources, including significant news coverage in Bloomberg, TechCrunch, on TV as recently as yesterday. I'm happy to revise or review with others but it seems the page was removed without actual review. Jebr1976a (talk)Jebr1976a

Ok. Then there shouldn't be a problem, but Bloomberg and TechCrunch lists all kinds of stuff. We need something more reliable. The New York Times article for example, or mass coverage by Fox News or CNN.--MollyPollyRolly (talk) 18:13, 30 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This Bloomberg article to which I linked is quite reliable and authoritative. Certainly more so than Fox News, I think. Here is another from Forbes. There was also a 12 minute TV interview with the CEO yesterday. Thank you @MollyPollyRolly, I appreciate your help. Jebr1976a (talk) Jebr1976a

Jebr1976a, you are invited to the Teahouse![edit]

Hi Jebr1976a! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia.
Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from experienced editors like GreenMeansGo (talk).

Visit the Teahouse

We hope to see you there!

Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts

16:01, 31 July 2021 (UTC)

Securitize[edit]

Securitize was a redirect for nearly 16 years until DogeofLA (talk · contribs) made an article of it in June which was reverted by Onel5969 because it was promotional. Eight weeks later you did the same. What is your relationship to DogeofLA? Cabayi (talk) 19:55, 7 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. I don't have any relationship and haven't reverted anything. I'm trying to create an article on a business I think is important in the blockchain space and seeking editor guidance as I do so. I do not believe the draft is at all promotional but if there is anything you think is of concern in the sandbox draft, please let me know! Jebr1976a (talk) 20:37, 13 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you. Cabayi (talk) 17:06, 14 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

AfC notification: Draft:Securitize, Inc. has a new comment[edit]

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Securitize, Inc.. Thanks! Robert McClenon (talk) 21:45, 13 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Securitize, Inc. (August 14)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Qwerfjkl was:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Securitize, Inc. and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Securitize, Inc., click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Qwerfjkl talk 15:17, 14 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Securitize, Inc. (October 10)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by S0091 was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of organizations and companies). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Press releases, etc. do not establish notability. SEC, FINRA, etc. are primary sources.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Securitize, Inc. and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Securitize, Inc., click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

S0091 (talk) 19:02, 10 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Securitize, Inc. (December 10)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by 331dot was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of organizations and companies). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Securitize, Inc. and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Securitize, Inc., click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

331dot (talk) 09:12, 10 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Securitize, Inc.[edit]

Hello, Jebr1976a. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Securitize, Inc., a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 17:03, 17 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Securitize, Inc. has been accepted[edit]

Securitize, Inc., which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Missvain (talk) 18:53, 8 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]