User talk:Jaustin5017
Jonathan Austin test
August 2011[edit]
Welcome to Wikipedia. It might not have been your intention, but your recent edit removed content from Jonathan Austin. When removing content, please specify a reason in the edit summary and discuss edits that are likely to be controversial on the article's talk page. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the content has been restored, as you can see from the page history. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia, and if you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. NtheP (talk) 16:31, 8 August 2011 (UTC)
Welcome to Wikipedia. Please do not replace pages with blank content, as you did with this edit to Jonathan Austin, as this is confusing to readers. The page's content has been restored for now. If there is a problem with the page, it should be edited or reverted to a previous version if possible; if you think the page should be removed entirely, see further information. Thank you. Jsharpminor (talk) 19:22, 10 August 2011 (UTC)
Jonathan Austin (cinematographer)[edit]
If this Jonathan Austin is notable enough to merit his own article then by all means create such an article, I suggest using the title Jonathan Austin (cinematographer). What you do not do is overwrite an existing article about another person of the same name. There are ways of disambiguating between people who share the same name which can be dealt with once there are two or more articles about Jonathan Austins. I do note from you username that you might be the said cinematographer, if you are please read Wikipedia:Autobiography before proceeding any further. If you are not Jonathan Austin but are closely connected with him please read Wikipedia:Conflict of interest before writing the article on Jonathan. NtheP (talk) 19:38, 10 August 2011 (UTC)
Hello Jaustin5017. If you are affiliated with some of the people, places or things you have written about on Wikipedia, you may have a conflict of interest. In keeping with Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy, edits where there is a conflict of interest, or where such a conflict might reasonably be inferred, are strongly discouraged. If you have a conflict of interest, you should avoid or exercise great caution when:
- editing or creating articles related to you, your organization, or its competitors, as well as projects and products they are involved with;
- participating in deletion discussions about articles related to you, your organization or its competitors; and
- linking to the Wikipedia article or website of your organization in other articles (see Wikipedia:Spam).
Please familiarize yourself with relevant policies and guidelines, especially those pertaining to neutral point of view, verifiability of information, and autobiographies.
For information on how to contribute to Wikipedia when you have a conflict of interest, please see our frequently asked questions for organizations. Thank you. Tgeairn (talk) 03:40, 29 November 2011 (UTC)
Speedy deletion nomination of Ascension Entertainment[edit]
If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.
A tag has been placed on Ascension Entertainment requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about an organization or company, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.
If you think that this notice was placed here in error, contest the deletion by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". Doing so will take you to the talk page where you will find a pre-formatted place for you to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. Toddst1 (talk) 16:29, 20 December 2011 (UTC)
The article L.E.A.D Uganda: Transforming Lives has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
- no evidence of notability
While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. — RHaworth (talk · contribs) 17:10, 21 January 2012 (UTC)
June 2015[edit]
Hello, I'm Optakeover. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions —the one you made with this edit to Jonathan Austin (filmmaker)— because it didn’t appear constructive to me. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Optakeover(Talk) 11:05, 12 June 2015 (UTC)
Please do not add inappropriate external links to Wikipedia, as you did to Jonathan Austin (filmmaker) with this edit. Wikipedia is not a collection of links nor should it be used for advertising or promotion. Inappropriate links may include, but are not limited to, links to personal websites, links to websites with which you are affiliated and links that attract visitors to a website or promote a product. See the external links guideline and spam guideline for further explanations. Because Wikipedia uses the nofollow attribute value, its external links are disregarded by most search engines. If you feel the link should be added to the article, please discuss it on the article's talk page rather than re-adding it. Thank you. Optakeover(Talk) 11:13, 12 June 2015 (UTC)
April 2016[edit]
Hello, I'm Oshwah. I noticed that you recently removed some content from Jonathan Austin (filmmaker) with this edit, without explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry, the removed content has been restored. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. ~Oshwah~(talk) (contribs) 17:07, 8 April 2016 (UTC)
Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Jonathan Austin (filmmaker) with this edit, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear constructive and has been reverted. Please make use of the sandbox if you'd like to experiment with test edits. Thank you. ~Oshwah~(talk) (contribs) 17:10, 8 April 2016 (UTC)
Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to remove portions of page content, templates or other materials from Wikipedia, as you did to Jonathan Austin (filmmaker) with this edit, you may be blocked from editing. ~Oshwah~(talk) (contribs) 17:27, 8 April 2016 (UTC)
May 2016[edit]
You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you remove or blank page content or templates from Wikipedia, as you did at Jonathan Austin (filmmaker). — JJMC89 (T·C) 04:22, 18 May 2016 (UTC)