User talk:Jason947

The Vikings[edit]

Please note that I have moved your article-in-progress to The Vikings (1958 film) to keep the article in line with Wikipedia article naming style. Good luck with the article! 23skidoo 03:25, 26 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Image tagging for Image:Dan brown.jpg[edit]

Thanks for uploading Image:Dan brown.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the source and creator of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the source and creator of the image on the image's description page, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided source information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 02:05, 3 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:Angelandapostle.jpg[edit]

Thanks for uploading Image:Angelandapostle.jpg. You've indicated that the image meets Wikipedia's criteria for non-free content, but there is no explanation of why it meets those criteria. Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. If you have any questions, please post them at Wikipedia:Media copyright questions.

Thank you for your cooperation. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. STBotI (talk) 03:57, 21 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Mount Nisir[edit]

Jason,

I have contacted two authorities looking for the reference for this information. Both have indicated that no such thing was ever recorded. Do you have the reference for this? I'd sure appreciate learning where this came from, and when in his rule Ashurbanipal had this inscribed.

Thanks,

Stephen1951 Stephen1951 (talk) 01:43, 29 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Stephen,

I do not have a reference for this information. It was an interesting fact that one of my teachers said in his lecture. If the experts disagree with this information, then maybe it is best to remove the page. In retrospect I probably should not have posted something that I have no proof for.

Sorry,

Jason Jason947 (talk) 22:58, 12 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Angel and Apostle for deletion[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Angel and Apostle is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Angel and Apostle until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. QVVERTYVS (hm?) 11:03, 3 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]