User talk:Jake pres

ARBPIA

This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.

You have shown interest in the Arab–Israeli conflict. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called discretionary sanctions is in effect. Any administrator may impose sanctions on editors who do not strictly follow Wikipedia's policies, or the page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic.

For additional information, please see the guidance on discretionary sanctions and the Arbitration Committee's decision here. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.

Additionally, editors may not edit material related to the Arab-Israeli topic area until they have 500 edits and 30 days of tenure. Please acquaint yourself with our content policies in other areas prior to editing articles in one of our more controversial topics. Thanks, nableezy - 03:40, 22 October 2021 (UTC)

Thank you. I had not seen this message before. Jake pres (talk) 16:23, 14 January 2022 (UTC)

I see multiple violations of the discretionary sanctions mentioned above and the note about 500 edits and 30 days

Please stop or you will simply be banned from the topic area. Doug Weller talk 13:51, 30 November 2021 (UTC)

User:Doug Weller; and today I see two more; to Al-Muzayri'a and El'ad. Jake pres: expect that the next vioation of the rules will bring you to WP:AE, Huldra (talk) 22:08, 2 December 2021 (UTC) ‎

Notice that you are now subject to an arbitration enforcement sanction

The following sanction now applies to you:

You are indefinitely banned from editing anything related to the Arab-Israeli conflict, broadly interpreted.

You have been sanctioned for continuing to ignore your restrictions as described above.

This sanction is imposed in my capacity as an uninvolved administrator under the authority of the Arbitration Committee's decision at Wikipedia:Arbitration/Index/Palestine-Israel articles#Final decision and, if applicable, the procedure described at Wikipedia:Arbitration Committee/Discretionary sanctions. This sanction has been recorded in the log of sanctions. If the sanction includes a ban, please read the banning policy to ensure you understand what this means. If you do not comply with this sanction, you may be blocked for an extended period, by way of enforcement of this sanction—and you may also be made subject to further sanctions.

You may appeal this sanction using the process described here. I recommend that you use the arbitration enforcement appeals template if you wish to submit an appeal to the arbitration enforcement noticeboard. You may also appeal directly to me (on my talk page), before or instead of appealing to the noticeboard. Even if you appeal this sanction, you remain bound by it until you are notified by an uninvolved administrator that the appeal has been successful. You are also free to contact me on my talk page if anything of the above is unclear to you. Doug Weller talk 13:42, 3 December 2021 (UTC)

I am blocking you until you show me I see an understanding of the DS alert above

You've been ignoring the fact that you are banned from the topic area. This may be because you haven't found this talk page yet. You cannot edit any page related to the conflict, and that includes talk pages. I also note that before you got the alert you changed sourced text at [1] where you also changed the title of the source, and at [2] where you would have seen a note when you edited it saying you needed 500 edits. You deleted the word "Palestine" from a quotation[3] after the alert, which was clearly vandalism. Doug Weller talk 16:41, 9 January 2022 (UTC)

January 2022

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abuse of editing privileges.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  Doug Weller talk 16:42, 9 January 2022 (UTC)

unlock request.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who accepted the request.

Jake pres (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

Update: I had not realized that I had been warned about a new guideline that I must have at least 500 or so edits before editing on a specific topic. For some reason the warning did not come up until now, So it would be nice to be unlocked so I can continue to contribute to Wikipedia. I appreciate you having your time reading my request, thank you.Jake pres (talk) 4:29 pm, Today (UTC+0)

Accept reason:

Ok, if you are unsure if something is covered, just don't edit it. Doug Weller talk 17:26, 14 January 2022 (UTC)

@Doug Weller: nableezy - 17:12, 14 January 2022 (UTC)

@doug weller thank you. Jake pres (talk) 18:14, 14 January 2022 (UTC)

Notices

This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.

You have shown interest in articles about living or recently deceased people, and edits relating to the subject (living or recently deceased) of such biographical articles. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called discretionary sanctions is in effect. Any administrator may impose sanctions on editors who do not strictly follow Wikipedia's policies, or the page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic.

For additional information, please see the guidance on discretionary sanctions and the Arbitration Committee's decision here. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.

This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.

You have shown interest in post-1992 politics of the United States and closely related people. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called discretionary sanctions is in effect. Any administrator may impose sanctions on editors who do not strictly follow Wikipedia's policies, or the page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic.

For additional information, please see the guidance on discretionary sanctions and the Arbitration Committee's decision here. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.

Acroterion (talk) 22:01, 6 March 2022 (UTC)

Concern regarding Draft:Darrell E. Brooks

Hello, Jake pres. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Darrell E. Brooks, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 22:00, 27 April 2022 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:Darrell E. Brooks

Hello, Jake pres. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Darrell E. Brooks".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 23:11, 25 May 2022 (UTC)