User talk:JPark99

Welcome!

Hello, JPark99, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on discussion pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{helpme}} before the question. Again, welcome! —Elipongo (Talk contribs) 03:52, 29 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

May 2013[edit]

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Brandon Airport may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "()"s and 2 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry, just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 09:55, 17 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Brandon Airport may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "()"s. If you have, don't worry, just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 09:48, 31 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Your edits at various airport articles[edit]

Please stop replacing dashes with ndashes at airport articles. Your changes are not in agreement with the WP:AIRPORT guidelines (more specifically WP:AIRPORT-CONTENT). Thanks.--Jetstreamer ^Talk 17:21, 29 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

As far as I can tell, my edits were completely within guidelines (and similar edits have been done on many other airport articles by other users) until you clarified the guidelines yourself, after already reverting all of my edits. I made those edits in a goodwill effort to try and stylistically improve wikipedia. I hope that you will go to every airport article and ensure there are only regular dashes, and not ndashes, being used. I apologize for the problems that these edits have caused. JPark99 (talk) 22:36, 29 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

June 2015[edit]

Hi there! Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia.

When editing Wikipedia, there is a field labeled "Edit summary" below the main edit box. It looks like this:

Edit summary (Briefly describe your changes)

I noticed your recent edit to Mexico City International Airport does not have an edit summary. Please be sure to provide a summary of every edit you make, even if you write only the briefest of summaries. The summaries are very helpful to people browsing an article's history.

Edit summary content is visible in:

Please use the edit summary to explain your reasoning for the edit, or a summary of what the edit changes. Thanks! Jetstreamer ^Talk 10:32, 11 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for September 4[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Manitoba, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Capital (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:53, 4 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open![edit]

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:51, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Possibly unfree File:Wasagamingmap.JPG[edit]

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Wasagamingmap.JPG, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the file description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you object to the listing for any reason. Thank you. Samuell ^{Lift me up} or _{put me down} 16:20, 26 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Just a further comment to the automatically generated messages. Thanks for uploading photos of the Riding Mountain area, most of them are as far as I can tell okay from a copyright perspective. The one issue with the file above is that it is a photo of a map that I assume is not your work and still in copyright. Wikimedia Commons' C:Commons:Copyright rules#Simple_checklist does a decent job of explaining what is a complex subject. Of course, if you feel that my assessment is wrong feel free to comment at the the discussion page. Samuell ^{Lift me up} or _{put me down} 16:32, 26 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Toronto Green Score[edit]

Hi JPark99, You may not be aware of this but GreenScore is working with the 50 cities indexed, provinces and the federal government to develop this index. Cities across the country are using it and the online development portal as a tool for city planning. It is by no means 'trivial'. Mayor John Tory's staff was briefed on this project the day he took office; I know this because I briefed his Council Liason. As for ranking, the index itself does not rank, BUT ranking is embedded in the same paragraph (most populous metropolitan, fourth most populous city) The score statistic rank is mentioned because it is significant and source verifiable. I am undoing your reversion..

Hi Mkevlar, As I explained in my note to you on your talk page, I reverted your edit not because the information is unverifiable or incorrect, but for the reason that I don't believe that the city's green score rating belongs in the first paragraph of the lead section of the Toronto article. I made a suggestion to you that the information and statistics about the city's green rating be included in the Toronto article in a different part of the article. I will start a discussion about this on the Toronto talk page to get input from other users. Thanks, JPark99 (talk) 05:53, 1 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Aer Lingus[edit]

Hi,

Fair point, will re update once they update the website, if you click on the flight number it will show the A330-300 equipment even though it says operated by ASSL. Should be removed in a few weeks. Jamie2k9 (talk) 21:33, 10 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open![edit]

Hello, JPark99. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for April 14[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Wasagaming, Manitoba, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Talk Radio (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:55, 14 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Removal of start/end dates[edit]

Can you please explain why you have removed the start/end dates for the seasonal flights at Maurice Bishop International Airport#Passenger. You say they are "unnecessary". Why would useful information be not needed, and you will note that many other passenger pages for other airports have dates for seasonal flights. As an example, I looked at random at a page which I have never previously visited let alone edited: Haneda_Airport#Passenger. Gunner1989 (talk) 13:05, 5 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I removed the start/end dates for seasonal flights in accordance with Wikipedia:WikiProject Airports/page content. It is specifically stated that start/end dates for seasonal service should not be included. Thanks, JPark99 (talk) 19:13, 5 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Fair enough, I now know about the dates. However, for Air Canada Rouge, there is a year-round Monday flight and a seasonal Thursday flight in the winter period. I know of a number of other cases, e.g. British Airways increasing flights from Gatwick to Barbados in the winter. How should this be dealt with? Gunner1989 (talk) 20:20, 5 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

It's my understanding that the only distinction that should be made on wikipedia is either year-round or seasonal flights. That said, you can pose this question at Wikipedia:WikiProject Airports/page content to get opinions from other editors with an understanding of airport article format. JPark99 (talk) 03:52, 9 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Brandon Municipal Airport Logo.svg[edit]

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Brandon Municipal Airport Logo.svg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:04, 28 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

DRN case closed[edit]

This message template was placed here by Nihlus, a volunteer at the Dispute Resolution Noticeboard. You recently filed a request or were a major party in the DRN case titled "Talk:Toronto#Changes to_the_First_Paragraph_of_the_Lead". The case is now closed: consensus has been reached If you are unsatisfied with this outcome, you may refile the DRN request or open a thread on another noticeboard as appropriate. If you have any questions please feel free to contact this volunteer at his/ her talk page or at the DRN talk page. Thank you! --Nihlus 14:48, 26 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Additional comments by volunteer: This is the approved version:
Toronto (/təˈrɒntoʊ/ , locally /təˈrɒnoʊ/ ) is the capital city of the Canadian province of Ontario. It is located within the Golden Horseshoe in Southern Ontario on the northern shore of Lake Ontario. With 2,731,571 residents in 2016, it is the largest city in Canada and fourth-largest city in North America by population. Also in 2016, the Toronto census metropolitan area (CMA), the majority of which is within the Greater Toronto Area (GTA), had a population of 5,928,040, making it Canada’s most populous CMA. A global city, Toronto is a centre of business, finance, arts, and culture, and is recognized as one of the most multicultural and cosmopolitan cities in the world.

ArbCom 2017 election voter message[edit]

Hello, JPark99. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Notification of Saboteurest/UrbanNerd SPI[edit]

Hi JPark99. Noticed you haven’t edited in over two months. Recall the discussion at Talk:Toronto six-plus months ago, and specifically this and the response? Well I found the time and just initiated a sockpuppet investigation (SPI) at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/UrbanNerd. Pinging Johnny Au as well, who encouraged me to file the SPI. Hope to see you back soon. Hwy43 (talk) 06:48, 12 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Hwy43. That's good to know, yet it doesn't change the fact that the ultimate outcome of this situation is that UrbanNerd/Saboteurest (or whichever account name this person now uses) was able to effectively have the Toronto article edited to their liking through an official dispute resolution process, after (in my opinion) making nonsensical edits and then instigating a completely unacceptable dialogue with yourself, myself, Johnny Au, and other editors at Talk:Toronto. UrbanNerd/Saboteurest can and will continue to freely repeat this behaviour going forward without consequence by using multiple and changing accounts. I appreciate your great work here and for letting me know about the outcome of the sockpuppet investigation, but it appears that Wikipedia will remain at the mercy of this kind of disruption and outcome to the benefit and desire of users such as UrbanNerd/Saboteurest. While I thoroughly enjoyed researching, editing and contributing to Wikipedia, I think that my time is much better spent being constructive elsewhere as opposed to wasting time here arguing with trolls, and then watching them get their way with the official blessing of Wikipedia. Perhaps a sockpuppet investigation could have been launched by the editors involved with the dispute resolution process? I wish I'd known how to initiate that kind of investigation myself, as I would have done it. It's clear to me that there really is no way to stop or prevent this kind of thing from happening again, and for that reason I have decided to no longer be associated with Wikipedia. I wish you well and good luck. JPark99 (talk) 00:11, 20 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message[edit]

Hello, JPark99. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]