User talk:Iune/Archive 8

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Re: 1972

I would hold off on the FLC until you've addressed the issues I've noted on the articles talk page. Other than those issues, it's not a bad start :) Cyclonebiskit 22:07, 29 January 2009 (UTC)

Hi Irmela, Yep ill take a look in a bit - but from what i have seen so far i cant see anything wrong with it. - Also the only reason i inisited on local time is because of This Jason Rees (talk) 19:29, 3 February 2009 (UTC)

To be honest Irmela, im not surprised that you struggled to find the 41st sesssion report as its hidden away in draft form on the 41st Typhoon Committees website which is linked to in the Events and Activitys section of the WMO's site, Anyway it just so happens i was on the WMO's site so here is the link to the draft report Amasingly there were no names retired this year. Jason Rees (talk) 19:52, 3 February 2009 (UTC)
Hi Irmela : Sorry i didnt respond last night - I needed time to think how to explain it - Basically per the MOS where we reference something and it needs two references we dont include a space. When i did my full review of your timeline FLC i noticed that you had spaces in between the references which is why i noted it. its nothing to worry about as i think JulianC93 took care of it for you. If you need further explaination let me know Jason Rees (talk) 20:57, 6 February 2009 (UTC)

Comments needed

You are receiving this message because you are listed as an active participant in WikiProject Meteorology, WikiProject Severe weather, and/or WikiProject Non-tropical storms. I have made a proposal to start an official assessment page for these three projects, under the WP:METEO banner. Since this would need significant participation to work properly, I'd like input from as many interested parties as possible (even those who may not watch the project pages), so please visit the discussion here and leave your thoughts/opinions. Thanks! -RunningOnBrains 02:52, 23 February 2009 (UTC)

Tropical cyclones WikiProject Newsletter #24

Number 24, March 7

The Hurricane Herald

This is the bi-monthly newsletter of WikiProject Tropical Cyclones. The Hurricane Herald aims to give a summary, both of the activities of the WikiProject and global tropical cyclone activity. If you wish to change how you receive this newsletter, or no longer wish to receive it, please add your username to the appropriate section on the mailing list. This newsletter covers all of January 2009 and February 2009.

Please visit this page and bookmark any suggestions of interest to you. This will help improve monitoring of the WikiProject's articles.

Cyclone Fanele near peak intensity
Cyclone Fanele near peak intensity

Storm of the month
Cyclone Fanele was the first cyclone of tropical cyclone status to strike western Madagascar since Cyclone Fame one year prior. It formed on January 18 in the Mozambique Channel, and rapidly organized, reaching peak winds of 185 km/h (115 mph). It weakened before moving ashore in Menabe Region southwest of Morondava, and rapidly deteriorated over land. Fanele briefly re-intensified after reaching open waters, only to become an extratropical cyclone by January 23. The cyclone caused heavy damage near where it moved ashore and along its path, resulting in at least eight deaths. Fanele struck Madagascar just two days after Tropical Storm Eric brushed the northeastern portion of the country. The two storms affected over 50,000 people, of which at least 4,000 were left homeless. Fanele struck the country during a series of government protests, and consequentially relief efforts were hindered.

Other tropical cyclone activity

  • Western Pacific Ocean– The first tropical cyclone of the season was Tropical Depression Auring, as designated by PAGASA. It formed on January 3 to the east of the Philippines, producing heavy rainfall and flooding on Mindanao island. Never organizing much, the depression dissipated a few days after forming, causing one death and destroying 305 houses. The next month, Tropical Depression Bising formed near Palau and, moving westward, later passed through the Philippines as a remnant low; rainfall from the system produced mudslides, though no major damage was reported.
  • South-West IndianTropical Storm Dongo was the first storm of January in the basin, and it remained over open waters without affecting landmasses throughout its duration. In the middle of the month along with Cyclone Fanele, Tropical Storm Eric developed and moved near Madagascar, killing one and producing heavy rainfall in the northeastern portion of the country. Later, Cyclone Gael killed two people on Réunion while tracking for ten days east of Madagascar; at the time it was the 2nd strongest cyclone of the season. Lastly, Tropical Storm Hina persisted for about five days, nearly reaching tropical cyclone status before weakening.
  • Australia- During the previous two months their have been nine Tropical Lows with four of them becoming a Tropical Cyclone whilst the remants of Cyclone Innis briefly moved into the Australian Region from the South Pacific. Cyclones Charlotte, Dominic, Ellie, and Freddy all caused damage to Australia and or the Indonesia Islands.
  • South Pacific- During the last two months the south Pacific has come alive with six depressions forming in January and February. The most significant depression was Tropical Depression 04F which brought heavy rainfall to Fiji and caused widespread flooding and killing at least 11 people. The first two named storms, Hettie and Innis also developed, each having minor effects on land.

Member of the month

Cyclone barnstar
Cyclone barnstar

The member of the month is... HurricaneSpin HurricaneSpin is a relativly new member of the project who has helped the project out by finding photos of Tropical Cyclones and uploading them to Commons. He is still getting to grips with the project but is coming on in leaps and bounds thus we have decided to make him the Member of the Month, for January and February 2009.

New and improved articles

Main Page content

Storm article statistics

Grade Oct Nov Dec Feb
FA 49 50 50 56
A 19 19 19 17
GA 190 198 202 239
B 13 21 22 14
C 119 118 122 122
Start 204 210 210 198
Stub 19 16 17 28
Total 613 631 642 669
ω 2.88 2.87 2.87 2.80
percentage
Less than C
36.4 35.8 35.4 33.0
percentage
GA or better
42.1 42.2 42.2 46.6

Project News
The project reached a milestone in the last two months in terms of article quality for all articles within the project. For the first time, the percentage of Good articles or better reached more than 1/3, and at the same time, the percentage of Start or Stub articles totaled less than 50%. In the previous twelve months, the overall project grew by 262 articles, of which 204, or 78%, were GA or better. Additionally, in terms of only storm articles, the project now has 46.6% of its articles as GA or better, and only 1/3 are Start or Stub. Unfortunately, much of that is due to newly-created articles easily attaining GA status. For storm articles, the total number of Start or Stub articles, currently 226, is about the same as it was a year ago. The lack of work on older articles is especially noticeable on season articles, where more than 75% of articles are still Stub or Start.

In an attempt to improve articles, there is talk of forming a collaboration between a few Wikipedians. The current project is to improve Hurricane Camille to FA status in time for its 40th anniversary this August. There is still plenty of work to be done, so if you're interested, any help would be appreciated.

Additionally, there is a recent discussion on the WPTC talk page about establishing a notability criteria. There was talk in the past of instating one, although this time the proposal is backed up by interpretations of existing Wikipedia policy. The proposal would limit articles to tropical cyclones that have at least one independent, reliable source other than any warning centers. Excluding cross-basin, off-season, or 64+ knot cyclones, the proposal would affect 26 articles, none of which affected land or lasted for an appreciable amount of time.

Jason Rees (talk) 00:55, 9 March 2009 (UTC)

2007-08 SPac

Hi Irmela.

It is correct, basically in their seasonal summuary, RSMC Nadi state quite clearly that Cyclone Gene was named six hours before it reached cyclone intensity for humanitarian reasons. Hope this helps Jason Rees (talk) 23:18, 11 March 2009 (UTC)

Re: Cyclone Fame 08

Hello, Iune. You have new messages at Kuyabribri's talk page.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

WPTC article challenge

Please keep in mind that articles for the WPTC article challenge must be mid-importance or higher; as such, storms like Karen 1989 are not valid. Just FYI. –Juliancolton Talk · Review 22:10, 25 March 2009 (UTC)

Wpac Scale

As far as i am aware its only for the HKO at the minute but im not sure i guess we will find out as we progress through the season. Also would you be able to have a read through off the Timeline of the 2007–08 South Pacific cyclone season as its at FLC, Many Thanks Jason Rees (talk) 19:40, 29 March 2009 (UTC)

Tropical cyclones WikiProject Newsletter #25

Number 25, April 4

The Hurricane Herald

This is the monthly newsletter of WikiProject Tropical Cyclones. The Hurricane Herald aims to provide a summary of both the activities of the WikiProject and global tropical cyclones. If you wish to change how you receive this newsletter, or no longer wish to receive it, please add your username to the appropriate section on the mailing list. This newsletter covers March 2009.

Please visit this page and bookmark any suggestions of interest to you. This will help improve monitoring of the WikiProject's articles.

Satellite image of Hamish near peak intensity

Storm of the month
Cyclone Hamish formed as a Tropical Low to the south of Papua New Guinea on March 4. The low quickly organized and became Tropical cyclone Hamish the following day. Hamish then started to rapidly intensify, becoming the second severe tropical cyclone of the season the next day. Throughout much of its duration, it moved southeastward, parallel to the coast of Queensland. It underwent rapid deepening over a period of 48 hours, Hamish reached peak winds of 215 km/h (130 mph) according to the Australia Bureau of Meteorology, making the cyclone a Category 5 on the Australian intensity scale. It quickly weakened due to wind shear, and without moving ashore it stalled and turned to a northwest drift. The low dissipated on March 5.

Hamish indirectly caused a major environmental disaster along the Queensland coastline, when strong waves from the cyclone damaged the hull of a cargo ship, spilling 260 tonnes of fuel and oil into the ocean. The oil washed onto the coastline, endangering the environment prompting a costly cleanup. Offshore, the fishermen went missing after the boat was lost; one person was found, although the other two remained missing and were presumed dead. As the storm remained offshore, overall damage directly from the storm was minor, primarily from strong waves.

Other tropical cyclone activity

  • Australia – In addition to Cyclone Hamish, three other cyclones formed and were named as Gabrielle, Ilsa and Jasper. However, there was no impact reported from these three storms whilst in the Australian region.
  • South Pacific – This month Cyclones Joni and Ken formed near to the Cook Islands, whilst Cyclone Jasper moved into the area at its peak and brought heavy rain and coastal erosion to New Caledonia. On the last day of the month Tropical Depression 14F formed to the northeast Fiji.
  • South-West Indian – Severe Tropical Storm Izilda was the only storm to form in the South-West Indian Ocean this month; however the extratropical remnants of Ilsa moved into the region from the Australian basin.

Member of the month

Cyclone barnstar
Cyclone barnstar

The member of the month is... Ramisses, has been a member of the Project since January 2008. He is a usefull editor who helps to make the trackmaps for the current season articles, as well as numerous other storms, from previous seasons. We just hope he is able to keep on top of the trackmaps when the busy part of the year comes!

Main Page content

Storm article statistics

Grade Nov Dec Feb Mar
FA 50 50 56 56
A 19 19 17 17
GA 198 202 239 244
B 21 22 14 15
C 118 122 122 120
Start 210 210 198 192
Stub 16 17 28 34
Total 631 642 669 678
ω 2.87 2.87 2.80 2.81
percentage
Less than C
35.8 35.4 33.0 33.3
percentage
GA or better
42.2 42.2 46.6 46.8

Project News
There is a discussion on the state of the project, discussing whether it still works like it used to, and what can be done about it. One extreme position is labeling the project inactive, while another position is eliminating some of the bureaucracy. Input would be very beneficial.

As part of the above discussion, there is a request for all active members to sign a list to affirm they are still active members in the project. If you don't sign the list, or if you don't consider yourself active anymore, your name will be placed on the inactive members list on May 1st.

Hurricanehink has organised a challenge to try and improve some of the Tropical cyclone articles. The rules are that you must take either an seasonal or a storm article from one of the eight basins we have, that is either a Stub, Start class or a brand new article and improve it to at least GA status. However to avoid several articles on cyclones that did not affect land, Hurricanehink has limited the challenge to storms/seasonal articles of Mid-importance or higher. Their is an exception to this rule for the Central Pacific as Cyclones rarely form in this basin. - For full details of the challenge see the Project's Talkpage Project member list

Jason Rees (talk) 01:17, 5 April 2009 (UTC)

2002 PHS

I was in the middle of putting it up on the talkpage as you were writing a message to me :} Jason Rees (talk) 21:27, 9 April 2009 (UTC)

done - On a side note why do you think that all cyclones are worthy of an article? Jason Rees (talk) 21:51, 9 April 2009 (UTC)
According to one of the FL directors each and every entry should get a local date. Jason Rees (talk) 21:57, 9 April 2009 (UTC)

Please don't FLC yet, I made some comments. It needs more work. ♬♩ Hurricanehink (talk) 22:03, 9 April 2009 (UTC)

Nevermind, I'll copy my comments there. ♬♩ Hurricanehink (talk) 22:04, 9 April 2009 (UTC)
FWIW, I think the nom was very premature, given you only got feedback from one person before FLC'ing it. ♬♩ Hurricanehink (talk) 22:10, 9 April 2009 (UTC)

Re: SHEM 96

I'm making a table because it is doubtful that anyone will find enough information on certain storms to develop a section. Infoboxes should have a paragraph or two running alongside them (or there should be enough info out there for someone to write something). Potapych (talk) 19:09, 10 April 2009 (UTC)

I'm going to see if I can make it into a template. As far as the storm images, I think that will be difficult to implement and it won't look very good. If there are some good images, I thought they could be placed into a gallery. Potapych (talk) 02:07, 11 April 2009 (UTC)
It's already pretty wide for small resolution monitors, so I eliminated a couple of columns from what I originally planned. Also, the track maps have fairly consistent dimensions, but the images people upload tend to widely skew the boxes. I think the gallery tag will work better.

DYK

Just so you know ive verifed your hook but ive suggested one that might be a little bit better Jason Rees (talk) 21:04, 12 April 2009 (UTC)

Someone, probably you, requested access to the account creation tool. For security purposes could you please confirm that it was you who made the request so we can approve you, thanks. FunPika 12:28, 11 April 2009 (UTC)

Good luck, Irdicent! Long time no see, eh? :) --Dylan620 Efforts ·Toolbox 13:05, 11 April 2009 (UTC)

ACC Tool

Thank you for applying to access the account creation tool. I have approved your request. You may now access the tool here. Before you do so, please read the tool's guide to familiarize yourself with the process. You may also want to join #wikipedia-en-accounts on irc and the mailing list. Keep in mind that the ACC tool is a powerful program, and misuse may result in your access being suspended by a tool administrator. Don't hesitate to get in touch with me if you have any questions. Thank you for participating in the account creation process. FunPika 13:09, 11 April 2009 (UTC)