User talk:Interstellarity/Archives/2020/August

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Administrators' newsletter – August 2020

News and updates for administrators from the past month (July 2020).

Administrator changes

added Red Phoenix
readded EuryalusSQL
removed JujutacularMonty845RettetastMadchester

Oversight changes

readded GB fan
removed KeeganOpabinia regalisPremeditated Chaos

Guideline and policy news


Sent by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 08:20, 1 August 2020 (UTC)

AFD stats

Re your 30 June 2020 Help Desk question (pinging participants Hut 8.5 and Lee Vilenski), I found some data published in 2019. Analyzing Wikipedia Deletion Debates with a Group Decision-Making Forecast Model looked at 369,592 discussions from January 1, 2005, to December 31, 2018, and found the following: of votes (2005-2018) 54.9% were for deletion, 28.4% for keep, 3.6% for merge, 3.8% for redirect, and 9.3% for 'Other', which is presumably mainly 'draftify' or 'userfy' votes. The outcomes found 63.9% closed as delete, 20.7% as keep, 3.2% as merge, 6.0% as redirect, and 6.2% for 'Other'. The caveat here is that they excluded all discussions "without an outcome label from an administrator", presumably NACs, which would skew the result more towards delete (since non-admins generally cannot close a discussion as delete). Also excluded is discussions with no votes after nomination, which makes up 3.0% of discussions.

They also note that we have "37 policy pages with 377 sections, 44 guideline pages with 398 sections, and 71 essay pages with 201 sections, all linked by a total of 2,111 shorthand aliases", just a fascinatingly high amount. Also, "all source code available is released under an open source license" so I will look into performing a more up to date analysis. Also worth noting is that "outcomes are more deletionist than votes" and "Across all votes in AfD’s history, 67.9% have been successful; this number rises to 75.6% when only considering votes for Keep or Delete outcomes and excluding votes for rare outcomes. Overall, deletionism is more successful: Delete votes are successful 82.0% of the time, while Keep votes have a 64.0% success rate". Anyways, thought you might want to see this when I stumbled upon it. Best wishes, Eddie891 Talk Work 11:37, 1 August 2020 (UTC)

@Eddie891: Thanks for the insight. That is helpful. Interstellarity (talk) 22:27, 1 August 2020 (UTC)

The Signpost: 2 August 2020

Please try again

Hello a page which you nominated at AFD, was not correctly transcluded into the log. Please try again.(Note: I reverted the edits to restore the format at Afd). Cheers Megan Barris (Lets talk📧) 12:53, 20 August 2020 (UTC)

Hello Synoman Barris! I have received errors while creating the deletion discussion with Twinkle. I have created it manually at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Flags of the World (website). Thanks for being concerned. Interstellarity (talk) 12:55, 20 August 2020 (UTC)
Interstellarity,  Fixed, added it’s back to the logs. Cheers Megan Barris (Lets talk📧) 12:58, 20 August 2020 (UTC)

The Signpost: 30 August 2020