Hello, Indigojones666, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:
Indigojones666, you are invited to the Teahouse![edit]
Hi Indigojones666! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia. Come join experienced editors at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a space where new editors can get help from experienced editors. These editors have been around for a long time and have extensive knowledge about how Wikipedia works. Come share your experiences, ask questions, and get advice from experts. I hope to see you there! Osarius (I'm a Teahouse host)
How do I change the name of the article from John Boyd Milliner to John Boyd (Milliner)
Please help me with...john_boyd.jpg was deleted from my article John Boyd Milliner. The photograph was taken by me and I am writing the wiki article. Please put the photograph back
The file has been deleted at Wikimedia Commons as a copyright infringement. There is nothing that can be done about that here on English Wikipedia, but if you believe that the deletion was a mistake, you can request restoration of the file on Commons, as explained at commons::Commons:Undeletion requests, but I suggest that before considering doing so you should first consult the Commons administrator who deleted the file, at commons:User talk:Ellin Beltz. The editor who uses the pseudonym "JamesBWatson" (talk) 12:18, 9 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:John Boyd Milliner and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:John Boyd Milliner. Thanks! Manway 19:26, 12 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]
John Boyd (Milliner), which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created. The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.
You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.
If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
Thanks Chris. [re: John Boyd (Milliner)]
Please see below
1. "At the calendar launch the collection was auctioned for charity and later the owners gifted these unique works to the V&A museum." [citation needed]
2. "hosted by Peter Lewis-Crown in aid of The National Lobster Hatchery."
Peter has been awarded an OBE.
Should read Peter Lewis-Crown OBE (Peter fought hand and foot for his OBE and would be devistated!)
3. I think the quote from John Boyd below should be included as it is very important to the resurgence of millinery in the 1980s:
“Mothers would drag in their daughters with long faces shouting ‘God, you’ll look a scream in that!” Then suddenly they all loved it. Diana was our best ambassador for hats and the entire millinery industry owes her a great debt.” John Boyd
Al Vandenberg, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created. The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.
You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.
If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
If you are the copyright holder for this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either
make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en@wikimedia.org, stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here. If you take this step, add {{OTRS pending}} to the file description page to prevent premature deletion.
If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to permissions-en@wikimedia.org.
If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. You may wish to read the Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Eeekster (talk) 20:29, 9 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Tutelary was:
This submission's references do not adequately evidence the subject's notability—see the general guideline on notability and the golden rule. Please improve the submission's referencing, so that the information is verifiable, and there is clear evidence of why the subject is notable and worthy of inclusion in an encyclopedia. What you can do: Add citations (see Wikipedia:Referencing for beginners) to secondary reliable sources that are entirely independent of the subject.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Glen Art and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
Hello, Indigojones666. It has been over six months since you last edited your WP:AFC draft article submission, entitled "Glen Art".
The page will shortly be deleted. If you plan on editing the page to address the issues raised when it was declined and resubmit it, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}} or {{db-g13}} code. Please note that Articles for Creation is not for indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace.
If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you want to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by one of two methods (don't do both): 1) follow the instructions at WP:REFUND/G13, or 2) copy this code: {{subst:Refund/G13|Draft:Glen Art}}, paste it in the edit box at this link, and click "Save page". An administrator will in most cases undelete the submission.
Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. JMHamo (talk) 13:41, 7 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 17:09, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Hi - I notice you have twice added embedded citations to the article on David Shaw contrary to WP:ECITE which states that the use of embedded links for inline citations is deprecated. Dormskirk (talk) 15:20, 10 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Hi - You should also read WP:CITE which says that "embedded links should never be used to place external links in the content of an article, like this: "Apple, Inc. announced their latest product...". Dormskirk (talk) 15:24, 10 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Disambiguation link notification for January 11[edit]
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited David Shaw (British Army officer), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Newcastle. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:08, 11 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Hello, Indigojones666. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
File permission problem with File:Al Vandenberg Tate Britain London 2010.jpg[edit]
Thanks for uploading File:Al Vandenberg Tate Britain London 2010.jpg. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file has agreed to release it under the given license.
If you are the copyright holder for this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either
make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en@wikimedia.org, stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here. If you take this step, add {{OTRS pending}} to the file description page to prevent premature deletion.
If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to permissions-en@wikimedia.org.
If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. You may wish to read Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.
ATTENTION: This is an automated, BOT-generated message. This bot DID NOT nominate your file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 03:00, 15 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Hello, Indigojones666. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
Please stop adding unreferenced or poorly referenced biographical content, especially if controversial, to articles or any other Wikipedia page, as you did at John Boyd (milliner). Content of this nature could be regarded as defamatory and is in violation of Wikipedia policy. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Chris Troutman (talk) 12:38, 1 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]
You have mentioned i have poorly referenced sources (john boyd milliner) - could you please point these out as I wish to offer the best edits possible
Please read WP:RS and WP:42, as well as WP:CITE. Adding content to Wikipedia comes with the responsibility of providing reliable sources to support those claims, as WP:V requires. Chris Troutman (talk) 12:59, 1 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]
The blog regarding John Boyd death (https://royalcircular.com/2018/02/22/john-boyd-royal-hat-maker-dies/) comes from the royal circular which is the official record that lists the engagements carried out by the Monarch of the United Kingdom and the other Commonwealth realms. This is a very respected outlet in the UK and common wealth and the author of this particular news article is much respected.
[Several newspapers, magazines, and other news organizations host columns on their web sites that they call blogs. These may be acceptable sources if the writers are professionals]
I think you're getting royalcircular.com confused with Court Circular, which does the things you mention. The latter is a believable source; the former is "powered by WordPress." Chris Troutman (talk) 13:17, 1 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]
I just spoke to his assistant Sarah Marshall and she has confirmed his death as reported by royalcircular.com
Add to your list of reading WP:TRUTH. I don't care if he actually is dead. Wikipedia needs a reliable source before we claim somebody is dead. If Boyd was all that famous, there will be an obituary published in the newspapers. Chris Troutman (talk) 13:23, 1 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]
It is good you are so circumspect. My wife's father Dave Swarbrick was reported dead in the daily Telegraph a few years ago when he was still alive; when he read his own obituary he had a stroke! He is really dead now so it is ok
As far as your draft goes, actually I can't hep you. I used to review drafts but was forced to quit because I tended to stomp on new editors. Months ago I gave up my ability to review drafts. I understand your frustration, though. It's not fun work for the volunteers and many editors get upset when we refuse drafts, which kind of puts us off the task. Sorry. As for people being dead, Rudy Boesch has been declared dead nine times in the past two years. It's true he's old but I have yet to see a newspaper confirming it. The moment I see an obit for Boyd, we'll fix the article, accordingly. Chris Troutman (talk) 16:19, 1 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]
You're welcome to nominate it for deletion. Just be careful if you look too eager. Editors get mad when you send "their articles" to deletion. As for me, I do what I can and step back when I think I should. I know that doesn't help you much. Chris Troutman (talk) 16:48, 1 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Talking of Rudy Boesch, Chuck Yeager is still alive! how do these guys do it?
I fixed it for you. His company's website says he's dead. I'm sorry for the hassle. I'm surprised there hasn't been much coverage of his death since he was so preeminent in his field. Chris Troutman (talk) 15:37, 5 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks Chris. I know strange. Apparently the Times will be running a biography soon
I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:BRAVEHOUND. Thanks! Legacypac (talk) 19:31, 9 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Legacypac was:
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:BRAVEHOUND and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:BRAVEHOUND, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{db-self}}" at the top of the draft text and save.
I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:BRAVEHOUND. Thanks! Legacypac (talk) 18:16, 10 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Bravehound, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created. The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.
You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. If your account is more than four days old and you have made at least 10 edits you can create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.
If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
If you happen to be in the local area of this organization, or know someone who is, a photo could really add to your new article. You can upload images to Wikimedia Commons and display them here, but please note the person uploading the image must be the owner of the image. Not "my friend Bob took it and says it's okay", but the actual owner/taker of the photo must upload it. There is a way you can file someone's permission with WP:OTRS but honestly it's a hassle and it's easier just to take your own photo, or ask a friend to personally upload one.
That aside, also please note that per WP:Logo you can upload the logo of the organization under Fair Use. DO NOT label it as "own work" or whatnot, and make sure the logo is no larger than 300px when you upload it. Then just click the form to say "fair use, logo, for this article only, etc" and you can upload an article and paste the code into the infobox of your page.
Nice work, sounds like a great charity, glad to see you've been working here for a few years and enjoyed it! MatthewVanitas (talk) 22:35, 10 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Is this proof enough it is ok to use the Bravehound logo for wiki article?
https://www.bravehound.co.uk/our-logo/
I have also sent this link to permissions-commons@wikimedia.org
Please help me with...I wish to start an article on Fiona MacDonald an opera singer and founder of Scottish charity Bravehound and Glen Art. As there is already a Fiona MacDonald on wikipedia how would I title her?... Fiona MacDonald (philanthropist)?
You'll likely need better references than these for an encyclopedia article about MacDonald (those only mention her in passing without providing any details), but the majority of thesedescriber her as "an opera singer from Arisaig", so "Fiona MacDonald (opera singer)" seems most appropriate. Huon (talk) 19:26, 12 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Yes I realise the articles would need to be more substantial - Thank you very much Regards Garry Indigojones666 (talk) 20:45, 12 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]
As previously advised, your edits give the impression you have a financial stake in promoting a topic, but you have not complied with Wikipedia's mandatory paid editing disclosure requirements. You were asked to cease editing until you responded by either stating that you are not being directly or indirectly compensated for your edits, or by complying with the mandatory requirements under the Wikimedia Terms of Use that you disclose your employer, client and affiliation. Again, you can post such a disclosure on your user page at User:Indigojones666, and the template {{Paid}} can be used for this purpose – e.g. in the form: {{paid|user=Indigojones666|employer=InsertName|client=InsertName}}. Please respond before making any other edits to Wikipedia. — JJMC89 (T·C) 15:20, 8 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Hi. Sorry I did not see your previous advice regarding the above. No I am not paid for editing this article Indigojones666 (talk) 15:27, 8 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Orphaned non-free image File:Glen Art Logo.png[edit]
⚠
Thanks for uploading File:Glen Art Logo.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
Please excuse my ignorance, but what exact statement should I use and where should I place it, so I can use the logo for Draft:Glen Art that conforms to Wikipedia’s requirements? Indigojones666 (talk) 13:31, 31 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Hello, Indigojones666, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:
You may also want to complete the Wikipedia Adventure, an interactive tour that will help you learn the basics of editing Wikipedia. You can visit the Teahouse to ask questions or seek help.
To keep up to date with interesting news and developments, you may also wish to subscribe to The Signpost, our illustrated monthly newspaper, and have it delivered directly to your talk page.
Glen Art, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created. The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.
You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. If your account is more than four days old and you have made at least 10 edits you can create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.
If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
Hello, Indigojones666. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:17, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:46, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Your recent item has bben moved to draftspace as it is not ready for publishing in the encyclopedia itself. Biographical articles cannot be accepted without adequate sourcing. Also there is nothing in the item that demonstrates notability. Please also review the guide to article creation and the manual of style. When considered ready, please submit the article for review and please do not move it to mainspace or it may be deleted. Thank you. Eagleash (talk) 11:40, 12 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Dear Mr Eagle (Eagleash), MacDonald is notable for being the founder and CEO of two military charities ~ Bravehound and Glen Art ~ which have helped hundreds of veterans and has raised millions of pounds for said veterans. MacDonald has also brought together many notable people in order to help these people.
My very reliable sources are ~ I really don't see how I can make them any better ~ BBC, Telegraph, Scotsman, Confederation of Service Charities, Prime Minister's Office of the United Kingdom, Big Issue, Animal Hero Awards, Jewish News and the National Lottery Good CausesIndigojones666 (talk) 18:21, 1 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by KylieTastic was:
This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Fiona MacDonald (fundraiser) and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Fiona MacDonald (fundraiser), click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
Hi Kylie, I pressed the wrong button and am working on Fiona MacDonald (Fundraiser) now. I have just finished Simon CarrollIndigojones666 (talk) 13:07, 12 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by AngusWOOF were:
This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.
The comment the reviewer left was:
This should be tightened up so that it focuses on MacDonald's role in the two major organizations. Need history as to how she got into the fundraising business? Also personal information such as date of birth need to be sourced. If she is an opera singer, where did she perform?
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Fiona MacDonald (fundraiser) and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Fiona MacDonald (fundraiser), click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
Are you joking? Have you seen pages such as https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Anne_Pigalle?.. this page has no sources.
I have loads of sources for MacDonald ~ All very respectable news organisations.
Here date of birth is there. Her importance is starting Glen Art and Bravehound not her singing. Both the charities she started do great work for military veterans. I cannot find very good references for her singing ~ hence I did not include and to reiterate that is not important.Indigojones666 (talk) 16:16, 12 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Glen Art and Bravehound, both of which are on wikipedia would not exist if not for MacDonald. This page had loads of sources. MacDonald has raised millions for military veteransIndigojones666 (talk) 16:41, 12 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]
She is a fundraiser ~ the whole point is she does stuff for other people and not for herselfIndigojones666 (talk) 16:45, 12 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]
MacDonald is not notable for her singing (there are also not many reliable sources to reference), she is notable for the two military charities she has founded and the millions she has raised for veterans (hundreds of reliable sources such as the BBC, Telegraph, Channel 5, All the Veteran charities etc). MacDonald is notable for all the help she gives to veterans who risked their lives to make our world safe. Why is James Middleton (British businessman) on wiki?.. he makes cakes! I can easily write more about MacDonald but it is not important, it is important what she does.Indigojones666 (talk) 17:43, 12 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]
My sources are BBC, The Telegraph, Prime Minister's Office UK, The Scotsman, Veterans' Foundation, Big Issue, The Confederation of Service Charities, Irish Independent, Scottish Parliament, Herald Scotland, National Lottery Good Causes, Forces Net. What are your sources?
Indigojones666 (talk) 18:47, 12 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Simon Carroll, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.
Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.
If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.
Hi Salimfadhley, I believe Fiona MacDonald (fundraiser) now meets all your suggestions. Thank you for your help it was much appreciated. RegardsIndigojones666 (talk) 13:00, 15 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]
KylieTastic, you quote this as Major Contribution....
Frank I. Haswell has 6 back links and is notable for nothing at all.
The first source is not trusted by google? "Honorable Frank I. Haswell". mtmemory.org.
The second source is not trusted by google? "Montana District Court Judges Frank I. Haswell and Eugene Foot". mtmemory.org.
Third link is an invalid URL "Montana District Court Judges Frank I. Haswell and Eugene Foot". mtmemory.org.
Well done with the fourthIndigojones666 (talk) 14:08, 15 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]
The article on Fiona MacDonald has back links to over 30 existing pages on Wikipedia, all of which she is citied in reliable news sources. I cannot reduce them more because this is how much she has done. Indigojones666 (talk) 14:11, 15 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]
KylieTastic and AngusW🐶🐶F are allowed to publish complete rubbish on Wikipedia ~ an encyclopaedia and not an extension of Facebook.
Please check out their user pages. They both declined my submission within 2 minutes but cannot be bothered to read it now? How are they allowed anywhere near a so called encyclopaedia? They totally undermine this project and give it a bad nameIndigojones666 (talk) 18:26, 15 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Your edit to Draft:Fiona MacDonald (fundraiser) has been removed in whole or in part, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without evidence of permission from the copyright holder. If you are the copyright holder, please read Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for more information on uploading your material to Wikipedia. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted material, including text or images from print publications or from other websites, without an appropriate and verifiable license. All such contributions will be deleted. You may use external websites or publications as a source of information, but not as a source of content, such as sentences or images—you must write using your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously, and persistent violators of our copyright policy will be blocked from editing. See Wikipedia:Copying text from other sources for more information. — Diannaa (talk) 11:43, 16 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]
What do you mean Diannaa? I have created Al Vandenberg, John Boyd (milliner), Bravehound, Simon Carroll, Glen Art. I understand what is notable, what are reliable sources ~ hence my pages are on wikipedia ~ what is wrong with Fiona MacDonald (Fundraiser). I have no idea what is your problem?Indigojones666 (talk) 15:48, 16 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]
How have I infringed copyright? Any photo I upload to wiki i give consent and give up that copyright? I am a photographer ~ https://www.garryrigby.com/Indigojones666 (talk) 15:50, 16 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]
I gave consent for wiki to use MY photo of Al Vandenberg, MY photo of John Boyd Milliner, MY photo of Simon Carroll because I care about wikipedia ~ how the F**k do YOU think I undermine wiki?Indigojones666 (talk) 15:56, 16 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Frankly, I have had enough of you and your friends being allowed to publish complete rubbish on wiki ~ this has to stop.Indigojones666 (talk) 19:36, 16 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Just to reiterate, why is MacDonald not on wiki, but your friends KylieTastic and AngusW🐶🐶F are allowed to publish complete rubbish? I have made a list of the rubbish they have done and will send shortly ~ it does not meet what you are asking of me????Indigojones666 (talk) 19:43, 16 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Hey Diannaa, I just spoke to my legal team and stupidity does still work in some states, so well done on thatIndigojones666 (talk) 19:52, 16 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:40, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Clearfrienda were:
This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.
The comment the reviewer left was:
Not much has improved since the last submission; most reliable, independent sources only provide trivial coverage, and the others seem to be nonindependent. Lots of claims and statements in this article are not supported by reliable sources, which violates the biography of a living person policy.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Fiona MacDonald (fundraiser) and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Fiona MacDonald (fundraiser), click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
FYI ~ I have just spoken to Fiona and she does not even want a page on Wiki ~ I just want to show how full of s**t you are.
Wiki editors are allowed to publish complete rubbish but I am not allowed to publish a page of a person with verified notoriety.
Shall I give you more examples of wiki editors who are allowed to publish complete rubbish?
Its a very long listIndigojones666 (talk) 01:20, 19 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]
The article ~ Fiona MacDonald ~ has these big banners saying…
“A major contributor to this article appears to have a close connection with its subject.”
“This article may have been created or edited in return for undisclosed payments”
How do you know this?
Because I told you.
Hey, lets look at my bank account and all the articles your editors publish on wiki.Indigojones666 (talk) 01:56, 19 December 2021 (UTC)
You are so fucking stupid I can’t wait… GoIndigojones666 (talk) 02:02, 19 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Hello, Indigojones666. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Fiona MacDonald (fundraiser), a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.
If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.
Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 01:02, 21 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Please stop adding unreferenced or poorly referenced biographical content, especially if controversial, to articles or any other Wikipedia page, as you did at John Boyd (milliner). Content of this nature could be regarded as defamatory and is in violation of Wikipedia policy. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Chris Troutman (talk) 12:38, 1 March 2018 (UTC)
Your edit to Draft:Fiona MacDonald (fundraiser) has been removed in whole or in part, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without evidence of permission from the copyright holder. If you are the copyright holder, please read Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for more information on uploading your material to Wikipedia. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted material, including text or images from print publications or from other websites, without an appropriate and verifiable license. All such contributions will be deleted. You may use external websites or publications as a source of information, but not as a source of content, such as sentences or images—you must write using your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously, and persistent violators of our copyright policy will be blocked from editing. See Wikipedia:Copying text from other sources for more information. — Diannaa (talk) 11:43, 16 September 2021 (UTC)
Hello, Indigojones666. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Fiona MacDonald (fundraiser), a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.