User talk:IllusionFinal

Welcome![edit]

Welcome to Wikipedia, IllusionFinal! I am CordeliaNaismith and have been editing Wikipedia for quite some time. I just wanted to say hi and welcome you to Wikipedia! If you have any questions, feel free to leave me a message on my talk page or by typing {{helpme}} at the bottom of this page. I love to help new users, so don't be afraid to leave a message! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Oh yeah, I almost forgot, when you post on talk pages you should sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); that should automatically produce your username and the date after your post. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Again, welcome!

CordeliaNaismith (talk) 03:16, 9 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Mireseerdhe po kujdes.[edit]

Ki pak kujdes ne editime, pasi mund te perjashtohesh shume kollaj. Ka nje tufe me antishqiptare qe mezi presin te te raportojne. --Sulmues _talk 14:21, 12 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Warning[edit]

Do not make personal attacks against other users as you did in your edit summary here. You may not refer to anybody as a "dick" and if you keep up your disruptive behaviour, you will be blocked from editing. Evlekis (Евлекис) 12:20, 5 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

In addition, there has been this contribution [1] that I am compelled to add for future references when an admin blocks your account. I however cannot issue a second warning as your own second offence occurred when you may not have known the procedure. Evlekis (Евлекис) 12:38, 5 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

December 2012[edit]

Your recent editing history shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.

To avoid being blocked, instead of reverting please consider using the article's talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. See BRD for how this is done. You can post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection. First and only warning. Athenean (talk) 22:37, 21 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent edits[edit]

Hello. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you should sign your posts by typing four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment. You could also click on the signature button or located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when they said it. Thank you. --SineBot (talk) 00:58, 22 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Edit warring at Albania[edit]

File:Yes

The Arbitration Committee has permitted administrators to impose discretionary sanctions (information on which is at Wikipedia:Arbitration Committee/Discretionary sanctions) on any editor who is active on pages broadly related to the Balkans. Discretionary sanctions can be used against an editor who repeatedly or seriously fails to adhere to the purpose of Wikipedia, satisfy any standard of behavior, or follow any normal editorial process. If you continue to misconduct yourself on pages relating to this topic, you may be placed under sanctions, which can include blocks, a revert limitation, or an article ban. The Committee's full decision can be read at the "Final decision" section of the decision page.

Please familiarise yourself with the information page at Wikipedia:Arbitration Committee/Discretionary sanctions, with the appropriate sections of Wikipedia:Arbitration Committee/Procedures, and with the case decision page before making any further edits to the pages in question. This notice is given by an uninvolved administrator and will be logged on the case decision, pursuant to the conditions of the Arbitration Committee's discretionary sanctions system.

You seem to have made four reverts in 24 hours at Albania, which breaks the WP:3RR rule. Warring about the numbers of adherents to different religions could be viewed as pushing a religious or nationalist point of view. The Arbitration Committee permits administrators to apply sanctions if they observe anyone not following the normal editorial process on articles in the Balkans. Thank you, EdJohnston (talk) 03:19, 22 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked for sockpuppetry[edit]

This account has been blocked from editing for a period of 6 months for sock puppetry per evidence presented at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/IllusionFinal. Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but using them for illegitimate reasons is not. Once the block has expired, you're welcome to make useful contributions. If you believe that this block was in error, and you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}} below, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. (X! · talk) · @517 · 11:24, 22 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]