User talk:Illegal editor
Welcome!
Hello, Illegal editor, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:
- The five pillars of Wikipedia
- How to edit a page
- Help pages
- Tutorial
- How to write a great article
- Manual of Style
I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question and then place {{helpme}} before the question on your talk page. Again, welcome! MastCell Talk 23:49, 10 June 2007 (UTC)
- The picture does seem piri piri, but strangely the plant is too low, and the fruit seems a bit bigger for such a low plant, but it does seem piri piri, not malagueta at all. Use it in your meals (cheaken, pork, fish), you wont regret it :P --Pedro 15:00, 16 June 2007 (UTC)
Test
Blocked[edit]
Block submitted for review at WP:AN/I here.
Illegal editor (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
Unblock please. I've been blocked under suspicion of being a sockpuppet of somebody. There is no evidence. Just suspicion. As the adminstrator above points out in his link, a check of the IP was done and no evidence was found. I have not been disruptive or violated any policies, so what's the point of the block? Isn't the whole point of block supposed to be used to prevent disruption? I've been pretty active for a while now and have violated no policies or anything. I think it's pretty clear that someone wants to eliminate me over content disputes. They have managed to convince a adminstrator "MastCell" that I'm a sockpuppet of "Billy Ego" so they can put unsourced data in articles without any challenge from me who tries to make sure the information is sourced and so they can delete information that is sourced that I try to keep in. In other words, a far-fetched claim has been made to get rid of an opponent in content disputes and the adminstrator, instead of acting with prudence, has acted recklessly and took the bait. Here is the result of the "checkuser" that was performed that MastCell has decided to ignore: [1] "No IP relationship detected." Holy sh*t. Look what I just found out. This BillyEgo was blocked for pushing a "fascist" POV. [2] This is proof that I am not a sockpuppet of BillyEgo. There is zero evidence of me supporting fascism. This is ridiculous.
Decline reason:
Checkuser evidence proves it, Billy. You and around eight other accounts you set up are now blocked. Your editting style has not changed.—Řÿūłóñģ (竜龍) 06:45, 23 June 2007 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
Illegal editor (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
Look. I am a sockpuppet of myself and myself only. I am NOT A SOCKPUPPET OF BILLY EGO. I have created MANY MANY sockpuppets, but they are NOT OF BILLY EGO. Look at the Billy Ego case! The guy was blocked for pushing fascism. He was a self-proclaimed fascist! I HATE fascism. There is no evidence of any of my sockpuppets pushing fascism, for crying out loud. Billy Ego apparently lives in the same area and shared or had a similar IP. That is the only evidence they have for me being a sockpuppet of Billy Ego. It's not true. The reason I create multiple sockpuppets of myself is because it makes it harder to be detected. Am I going to have to start making a different sockpuppet for every single edit? How can I get this block lifted? As it stands I am blocked for life. It's truly absurd. I have to sneak around making sockpuppets so that I can improve Wikipedia. God knows that's all I'm doing, is improving Wikipedia. I'm pushing for things to be sourced, sourcing nearly everything I add to articles (with only a few neglectful oversights in that area which I source when requested), and fighting against original research. How can I get this block lifted? Somebody needs to go back and review the Billy Ego case. Due diligence was not done. Who can I speak to about this? By the way, my roomate is also affected by this. He's having to do the same thing, which is make multiple usernames to avoid being wrongly blocked with the false claim that he is a sockpuppet of Billy Ego.
Decline reason:
Ryulong is right, checkuser confirms it without a doubt. — ^demon[omg plz] 07:17, 23 June 2007 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
Look. I am a sockpuppet of myself and myself only. I am NOT A SOCKPUPPET OF BILLY EGO. I have created MANY MANY sockpuppets, but they are NOT OF BILLY EGO. Look at the Billy Ego case! The guy was blocked for pushing fascism. He was a self-proclaimed fascist! I HATE fascism. There is no evidence of any of my sockpuppets pushing fascism, for crying out loud. Billy Ego apparently lives in the same area and shared or had a similar IP. That is the only evidence they have for me being a sockpuppet of Billy Ego. It's not true. The reason I create multiple sockpuppets of myself is because it makes it harder to be detected. Am I going to have to start making a different sockpuppet for every single edit? How can I get this block lifted? As it stands I am blocked for life. It's truly absurd. I have to sneak around making sockpuppets so that I can improve Wikipedia. God knows that's all I'm doing, is improving Wikipedia. I'm pushing for things to be sourced, sourcing nearly everything I add to articles (with only a few neglectful oversights in that area which I source when requested), and fighting against original research. How can I get this block lifted? Somebody needs to go back and review the Billy Ego case. Due diligence was not done. Who can I speak to about this? Illegal editor 06:50, 23 June 2007 (UTC)
By the way, my roomate is also affected by this. He's having to do the same thing, which is make multiple usernames to avoid being wrongly blocked with the false claim that he is a sockpuppet of Billy Ego. Illegal editor 07:06, 23 June 2007 (UTC)
Illegal editor (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
I am not a sockpuppet of Billy Ego. I might have the same ISP or live in the same area as Billy Ego, but I'm not him! A checkuser does not prove it. Look at why Billy Ego was blocked. He was blocked for pushing fascism. None of my multiple usernames have pushed fascism. What's hapenning is you're finding multiple usernames of *ME*, not Billy Ego. I really need to talk to someone higher up in the hierarchy about this. A mistake was made in the Billy Ego arbitration case. The only evidence was a checkuser, which simply turned up people in the same geographic area ...none of which pushed a fascist POV. I'm a free-marketer, guys. That's the opposite of fascism. Who can I speak to higher up in the adminstration hierrarchy? Don't worry about unblocking me right now. Just tell me who is your supervisor? I need to speak to someone higher in authority.
Decline reason:
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
Haha. You guys are crazy! I am not a sockpuppet of Billy Ego. I might have the same ISP or live in the same area as Billy Ego, but I'm not him! A checkuser does not prove it. Look at why Billy Ego was blocked. He was blocked for pushing fascism. None of my multiple usernames have pushed fascism. What's hapenning is you're finding multiple usernames of *ME*, not Billy Ego. I really need to talk to someone higher up in the hiearchy about this. A mistake was made in the Billy Ego arbitration case. The only evidence was a checkuser, which simply turned up people in the same geographic area ...none of which pushed a fascist POV. I'm a free-marketer, guys. That's the opposite of fascism. Who can I speak to higher up in the adminstration hieararchy? Illegal editor 07:22, 23 June 2007 (UTC)
No offense, but you administrators are the equivalent of a bunch of incompetant telephone operators at a third world call center. That's ok. I understand that you are just menial workers. How competant can someone that works for free be? But the problem is you don't have supervisors that I can request to be put on the phone. Maybe this is why Wikipedia doesn't work. You guys have no supervisors. I guess the multiple usernames will go on then, and in greater numbers. There's already many more than I'm using that you haven't found. I'm just going to have to change strategies to make them more difficult to find. Believe me, I have a lot of tricks up my sleeve and will get this down to a exact science. Illegal editor 07:51, 23 June 2007 (UTC)
"Illegal editor" was just a test account anyway. Look at the username. How much more obvious could I make it that I was a blocked user? If it took that long time to figure it out, then I'm well on my way to being totally undetectable. (And don't think I know the editing style's some of you are looking for. I don't use those styles on all my usernames.) Illegal editor 08:06, 23 June 2007 (UTC)
As a test, I just made an edit with another username. Can you guys find it? Illegal editor 08:10, 23 June 2007 (UTC)
- Didn't think you would. Illegal editor 08:16, 23 June 2007 (UTC)