User talk:Iamnowa

testIamnowa (talk) 20:12, 3 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Hohead for deletion[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Hohead is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Hohead until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. LongLiveMusic (talk) 05:34, 1 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

This is historically important to document the prejudice experienced by freethinking people who dared question the system in the 60s. A lot of blood was shed then so we can now express ourselves freely. This was part of that struggle and documents bullying at it's ugliest

Hohead Deletion[edit]

Hi Iamnowa. I have made some pretty strong comments on the deletion page. Just so you know, it is not personal. You obviously feel strongly about this and you seem to have first-hand knowledge. I think you could do some good work on Wikipedia, and dissenting voices are always interesting. BUT, you need to take a look around- even articles on much less important issues need to be backed up with something more than "I know...I was there!"Tigerboy1966 (talk) 16:38, 2 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]