User talk:Hz.tiang/Archive 2
Want to help?[edit]
Hey Hz.tiang, I trust you know about the haze in Singapore right? If you want, you can come and help on this article. I haven't been doing vandal patrolling for almost 2 weeks because I have been busy on that article! 
You may want to view the article's talk page for some stuff too. Cheers.
Arctic Kangaroo (✉ • ✎) 04:59, 29 June 2013 (UTC)
Hanna Zayachkivska[edit]
Hi!
I know Anna personally and I have seen her passport. There is two Ukrainian names, Hanna and Anna, and she is Anna (Анна). In her social pages she insisted that she is Anna, not Hanna. Her surname is Zaiachkivska, not Zayachkivska. She is not a model, she consider herself a painter and a singer. http://www.missworld.com/Contestants/Ukraine/ Marina176.98.15.100 (talk) 09:16, 27 September 2013 (UTC)
you are wrong chhers and gone. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 217.39.153.161 (talk) 10:25, 27 September 2013 (UTC)
request for blocking[edit]
Its come to my attention that my autistic child has been editing/vandalising the wikipedia pages for SO FRESH. I would like our IP address indefinitely blocked from editing please as I cannot ensure they will stop. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 58.164.1.148 (talk) 00:53, 30 September 2013 (UTC)
request for blocking[edit]
Its come to my attention that my autistic child has been editing/vandalising the wikipedia pages for SO FRESH. I would like the IP address indefinitely blocked from editing please as I cannot ensure they will stop. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 58.164.1.148 (talk) 00:55, 30 September 2013 (UTC)
Regarding Deletion of my article named Priganik Technologies[edit]
hi
You deleted the article "Priganik Technologies" due to copy right issue,as it is same on http://www.slideshare.net/priganik/3-6-months-industrial-training-for-btech-mtech, i would like to inform you that this article on slideshare.net is also owned by me, ie its user id is priganik@gmail.com and i had submitted the article. So I am allowing, you can take text and pictures or images from it also or what let me know what I have to do on my side to grant permission to you or wikipedia for submission of my article "Priganik Technologies" Priganik (talk) 10:39, 28 December 2013 (UTC) Regards Priganik
- Hi Priganik. Your article Priganik Technologies is written like an advert and thus, I'm afraid it is not allowed to be not Wikipedia. You might want to read What Wikipedia is not to understand. If you would like your article to stay on Wikipedia, you will need to fundamentally rewrite it to make it encyclopedic. Hz. tiang 11:23, 28 December 2013 (UTC)
Hello[edit]
Hello Hz.tiang. my name is Niko, i am fairly new to this site and was wonder how do you put artical links onto your user page? Also how are you today? (Mudak568 (talk) 14:26, 3 January 2014 (UTC))
- Sorry for the late reply. I'm quite busy nowadays. You can put links by placing [[ and ]] around text. For example, to link to the article titled Science I do this: [[Science]] Hz. tiang 07:30, 2 March 2014 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for March 2[edit]
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited List of environmental issues, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Conservation (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:14, 2 March 2014 (UTC)
hi ............. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 1.186.26.49 (talk) 09:30, 22 October 2014 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for December 12[edit]
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Okto, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Indian. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:06, 12 December 2014 (UTC)
Test edit at CW?[edit]
No, it wasnt a test, I was adding inportant information for parents looking at CW as a possible treatment. Why was it removed?? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 72.209.59.70 (talk) 11:07, 29 December 2014 (UTC)
- Looking at your edit, I realised I've made a mistake. In the future however, please avoid using caps as it very much resembles test edits and vandalism. Nonetheless, I've added back your edit. Sorry about my mistake. heyzec! 11:28, 29 December 2014 (UTC)
Hi Hz.tiang. After reviewing your request for rollback, I have enabled rollback on your account. Keep in mind these things when going to use rollback:
- Getting rollback is no more momentous than installing Twinkle.
- Rollback should be used to revert clear cases of vandalism only, and not good faith edits.
- Rollback should never be used to edit war.
- If abused, rollback rights can be revoked.
- Use common sense.
If you no longer want rollback, contact me and I'll remove it. Also, for some more information on how to use rollback, see Wikipedia:New admin school/Rollback (even though you're not an admin). I'm sure you'll do great with rollback, but feel free to leave me a message on my talk page if you run into troubles or have any questions about appropriate/inappropriate use of rollback. Thank you for helping to reduce vandalism. Happy editing! — xaosflux Talk 17:16, 29 December 2014 (UTC)
Rollback! Wooo![edit]
Hey I'm Abigail. Welcome to the wonderful world of rollback! I just noticed you got accepted to become one and just thought I'd drop in and welcome you. If you have any questions, concerns, or recommendations, feel free to reply here, send me a message, or email me and I'll help to the best of my ability. Again, welcome! Have fun :D -A Wild Abigail Appears! Capture me. Moves. 19:36, 29 December 2014 (UTC)
- Hi there Abigail, thanks for your welcome! It is really nice to see such kind users like you on Wikipedia! For now I don't really have any questions, but if I do I will remember ask you. Thanks! heyzec! 02:18, 30 December 2014 (UTC)
My change to the GQ page was considerably more constructive than the GQ story that led to the edit. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 50.166.105.154 (talk) 06:25, 30 December 2014 (UTC)
- Your edit does not appear constructive. Your use of the word "Suckers." is totally irrelevant. Do correct me if you still think I've made a mistake. heyzec! 06:31, 30 December 2014 (UTC)
Welcome to STiki![edit]
|
Hello, Hz.tiang, and welcome to STiki! Thank you for your recent contributions using our tool. We at STiki hope you like using the tool and decide to continue using it in the future. Here are some pages that you might find helpful: Here are some pages which are a little more fun:
We hope you enjoy maintaining Wikipedia with STiki! If you have any questions, problems, or suggestions don't hesitate to drop a note over at the STiki talk page and we'll be more than happy to help. Again, welcome, and thanks! West.andrew.g (developer) and Faizan 08:36, 30 December 2014 (UTC) |
|
Incomplete DYK nomination[edit]
Hello! Your submission of Template:Did you know nominations/Indonesia AirAsia Flight 8501 at the Did You Know nominations page is not complete; see step 3 of the nomination procedure. If you do not want to continue with the nomination, tag the nomination page with {{db-g7}}, or ask a DYK admin. Thank you. DYKHousekeepingBot (talk) 08:46, 31 December 2014 (UTC)
18:18:51, 31 December 2014 review of submission by 198.72.145.234[edit]
Hi,
You have declined the following article http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Draft:Dario_Black#Dario_Black_-_Recording_Artist
It says you need reference to verify the information. would this consider reliable source? Please keep in mind artist previous name was Dario Benitez but now he goes by Dario Black
http://skopemag.com/2010/09/13/stoli-sees-big-things-ahead-for-dario-benitez
198.72.145.234 (talk) 18:18, 31 December 2014 (UTC)
- Hi there 198.72.145.234, the first reference should be reliable as it is published by Skope Magazine. The second reference looks unreliable as it appears to be a poster of some sort. I that recommend you read Identifying reliable sources. You might also want to read Whether to create standalone pages.
- A little tip to find reliable sources is to use Google News. Use quotation marks ("") like this to let Google list only results that match the term exactly.
- If you have further questions you can ask here at my talk page and I will try my best to help. Alternatively, you can ask at the Teahouse and another user will be happy to assist you. Happy editing! heyzec! 04:03, 1 January 2015 (UTC)
I notice that you tried to deal with some vandalism there, and I appreciate that. After that, you then restored the vandalism, allowed more vandalism, then made another attempt to fix it, but didn't totally delete all of it. What happened? It looks like you weren't carefully checking the editing history to see what was actually happening. Please do that in the future. Fortunately another editor removed the last traces of vandalism. Otherwise I still appreciate that you did try. -- Brangifer (talk) 07:56, 31 December 2014 (UTC)
- When I looked at 72.209.59.70's edit , I assumed it was vandalism and reverted it. 72.209.59.70 left a message on my talk page and I thought I've mistook the edit for vandalism, so I undid my revert. After a while I remembered that 72.209.59.70's edit had caps in it and I manually changed it to lowercase. Now I'm confused; was 72.209.59.70's edit vandalism? Was 72.209.59.70 trolling me by leaving a message on my user talk? heyzec! 08:49, 31 December 2014 (UTC)
- If you check the quality of their edit, you'll see they were adding poor quality content that amounts to a form of vandalism/misuse of Wikipedia. Their message to you were the common reactions of a newbie who doesn't understand that we can't allow such content here. -- Brangifer (talk) 15:27, 31 December 2014 (UTC)
- In the future if I were encounter another user leaving a similar message, should tell them their edit was not good quality? I worry that this discourages them from editing Wikipedia in the future. heyzec! 04:18, 1 January 2015 (UTC)
- I understand your concern. It's always a balancing act. We must guard articles from content which violates our policies and guidelines, and yet we must try to not bite newbies, and we have a duty to explain why we can't accept their edits. If you have the time, give them a few links, a welcome template, and/or an explanation. They need to understand that unsourced opinions are not allowed. -- Brangifer (talk) 05:59, 1 January 2015 (UTC)
- In the future if I were encounter another user leaving a similar message, should tell them their edit was not good quality? I worry that this discourages them from editing Wikipedia in the future. heyzec! 04:18, 1 January 2015 (UTC)
- If you check the quality of their edit, you'll see they were adding poor quality content that amounts to a form of vandalism/misuse of Wikipedia. Their message to you were the common reactions of a newbie who doesn't understand that we can't allow such content here. -- Brangifer (talk) 15:27, 31 December 2014 (UTC)
Happy New Year Hz.tiang![edit]
Hz.tiang,
Have a prosperous, productive and enjoyable New Year, and thanks for your contributions to Wikipedia. --L235 (talk) Ping when replying 06:12, 1 January 2015 (UTC)
Using font tags in your signature[edit]
Hello there! I'm working on a project trying to bring most of the coding on Wikipedia up to the most current standards (HTML5), and I noticed that your signature is using <font>...</font> tags which were deprecated in HTML 4.0 Transitional, marked as invalid in 4.0 Strict, and are not part of HTML5 at all. I'd love to help you update your signature to use newer code, and if you're interested, I suggest replacing:
[[User:Hz.tiang|<font color="blue" size="3px">'''hey'''</font>]][[User talk:Hz.tiang|<font color="green" size="3px">'''zec!'''</font>]]
with:
[[User:Hz.tiang|<b style="color:blue;font-size:medium">hey</b>]][[User talk:Hz.tiang|<b style="color:green;font-size:medium">zec!</b>]]
which will result in a 135 character long signature with an appearance of: heyzec!compared to your existing 135 character long signature of: heyzec! — Either way. Happy editing! Darylgolden(talk) 06:36, 1 January 2015 (UTC)
- I've changed my signiture. I'm still curious, though, why is there a need to change the coding? Wiki markup uses ''' to make words bold, while HTML5 uses <b>. Doesn't that mean for your project you would have to change the Wiki markup used by Wikipedia and its sister projects, as well as all the articles in Wikipedia? heyzec! 06:44, 1 January 2015 (UTC)
- No, the main thing I wanted to change was the font tags, which was deprecated in HTML 5. The ''' is perfectly fine, I just changed it to shorten your signature, since there's no point having <span style=whatever stuff>'''bold things'''</span> when you can combine the span and the ''' into b style. Thanks, and happy new year from a fellow Singaporean! Darylgolden(talk) 06:52, 1 January 2015 (UTC)
Happy New Year Hz.tiang![edit]
Hz.tiang,
Have a prosperous, productive and enjoyable New Year, and thanks for your contributions to Wikipedia. Darylgolden(talk) 07:08, 1 January 2015 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for January 1[edit]
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited IMM (Singapore), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Westgate. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:04, 1 January 2015 (UTC)
Orphaned non-free image File:IMM Mall Logo.png[edit]
Thanks for uploading File:IMM Mall Logo.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 20:43, 1 January 2015 (UTC)
You and Matthew V. have reviewed my article on Walter Russell, and neither of you "get it". I am aware that there has been an article on Russell for nine years, that's why I am writing a replacement. If you cannot accept my sources or the fact that Russell is "notable" by any criteria, then delete the Russell entry. The present article is inaccurate, defamatory, and injurious, and an insult to Russell's students. I am outraged at the arrogance of Wikipedia's "editors". Thanks for replying so promptly.Chazhardy (talk) 04:26, 2 January 2015 (UTC)
Chazhardy (talk) 04:26, 2 January 2015 (UTC)
Good evening Hz.tiang,
May I ask you how many sculptures you have cast in bronze? How many oil paintings you have done? How many co-operative apartments you have built? How many concepts of the Universe have you written about? How many elements and isotopes you have discovered?
How then can you say that Walter Russell's notability has to be proven? The list of his accomplishments is self-evident. You don't need some professor with a list of degrees to pronounce Russell notable or not. My replacement article for Walter Russell makes his accomplishments known, I have included all the secondary sources I can. Russell is unconventional, he is not an academic but a self-made man. Read my article again. I have tried to provide a bare bones treatment so others can insert additional material. I think the article is a vast improvement over the article that has been there for nine years.Chazhardy (talk) 04:42, 2 January 2015 (UTC)
- Hi there Chazhardy. When one make a claim, one will have to show the proof of his work. Similarly in Wikipedia, you need to have the proof to support your claims. You need the proof to show how Walter Russell is notable.
- Looking at your article, I see that you have sources but you have not citied them correctly. Do take a look at Referencing for beginners to cite your sources properly. Inline citations like this[1] should appear in your article.
- Also, your article needs to be broken down into sections. Without proper sectioning, readers will not be able to find the information they want quickly from your article.
- Lastly, do note that article Walter Russell has been on Wikipedia for quite some time. I strongly recommend you to edit Walter Russell. Replacing an article entirely can be a waste of time and effort. heyzec! 16:47, 2 January 2015 (UTC)
Example References (ignore)[edit]
Interview for The Signpost[edit]
This is being sent to you as a member of WikiProject Articles for creation
The WikiProject Report would like to focus on WikiProject Articles for creation for a Signpost article. This is an excellent opportunity to draw attention to your efforts and attract new members to the project. Would you be willing to participate in an interview? If so, here are the questions for the interview. Just add your response below each question and feel free to skip any questions that you don't feel comfortable answering. Multiple editors will have an opportunity to respond to the interview questions, so be sure to sign your answers. If you know anyone else who would like to participate in the interview, please share this with them. Thanks, Rcsprinter123 (consult) @ 09:54, 5 January 2015 (UTC)
PRAYAG (organization)[edit]
Hi, It's regarding the page PRAYAG (organization), i have use citation in my page and re-submitted. Please let me know if that's fine. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Geet9118 (talk • contribs) 15:01, 6 January 2015 (UTC)
Your comment to SAP-wiki-account[edit]
Hi Hz.Tiang, Thank you for your remark. I have added a short description on what SAP does. Thanks Tania — Preceding unsigned comment added by SAP-wiki-account (talk • contribs) 08:43, 7 January 2015 (UTC)
- 49.207.29.26 (talk · contribs)
Regarding: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Draft:The_Dollar_Business
I added a new reference in the draft page. But after reviewing, you said " No change from previous decline."
Can you elaborate please?
49.207.29.26 (talk) 10:03, 19 January 2015 (UTC)
- Hi there. I see that you have made an edit, referencing to another Wikipedia article. This is discouraged, and instead you should reference to the citation listed on the Wikipedia article itself.
- Secondly, adding one or two references alone is not enough for your article to be accepted. Also, please look at the comments that other editors have provided on your article as the are more issues in your article, such as not using neutral point of view. Thanks! heyzec! 10:18, 19 January 2015 (UTC)
Hi. Please be more careful when reviewing AfC drafts such as Draft:American Business and Technology University. I can't say that I have lots of experience in this area, hence why I did not outright accept it, but keep in mind WP:SCHOOLOUTCOMES- declining as non-notable certainly wasn't the best course of action. Cheers, --L235 (talk) As a courtesy, please ping me when replying. 21:24, 1 February 2015 (UTC)
- I'm also relatively new to AfC. When I decline a draft under notability, the message that appears to the draft creator will be:
- This submission's references do not adequately show the subject's notability—see the guidelines on the notability of organizations and companies and the golden rule.
- I believe that just means the draft does not show the subject's notability, which does not necessarily mean that the subject is not notable. Anyway, I googled for the university and it does not seem to have much coverage. I'm not very sure if I'm correct though... heyzec! 13:02, 3 February 2015 (UTC)
- Thanks for the reply. I am aware of the messages left by AFCH/etc. Even if not much coverage is found, per WP:SCHOOLOUTCOMES any accredited degree-awarding institution is notable if it can be proven to exist. Cheers, --L235 (talk) As a courtesy, please ping me when replying. 17:06, 3 February 2015 (UTC)