User talk:Hydrogenation/Archive 1

This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page.

Archive 1

Hydrogenation, you are invited to the Teahouse!

Hi Hydrogenation! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia.
Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from experienced editors like ChamithN (talk).

Visit the Teahouse

We hope to see you there!

Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts

16:04, 20 June 2019 (UTC)

Old Testament Prophets

The sentence you deleted is consistent with the Wikipedia article "Prophet". Please read it.

Prophets regarded as being in contact with a divine being and is said to speak on behalf of that being, serving as an intermediary with humanity by delivering messages or teachings from the supernatural source to other people
Prophetic assignment is usually portrayed as rigorous and exacting in the Hebrew Bible, and prophets were often the target of persecution and opposition. According to I Samuel 9:9,[33] the old name for navi is ro'eh, רֹאֶה, which literally means "Seer". That could document an ancient shift, from viewing prophets as seers for hire to viewing them as moral teachers. L.C. Allen (1971) comments that in the First Temple Era, there were essentially seer-priests belonging to a guild, who performed divination, rituals, and sacrifices, and were scribes; and beside these were canonical prophets, who did none of these things (and condemned divination), but came to deliver a message.

The article is weal identify them as behaving as lunatics but gives many examples. I can insert a citation that they did. See [[1]]. 2601:140:8980:4B20:D968:7CEF:7DB0:F864 (talk) 00:19, 15 June 2021 (UTC)

Kiaraakitty

As you can see, the page has been compromised (hope it gets protected pronto), and I have no confidence that it isn't the same way for the AfD. I hope you can objectively comment on the discussion and see if it merits a keep or not. IMO only the subject herself would want the article gone, if you truly consider all the sources presented therein Kingoflettuce (talk) 19:27, 13 June 2021 (UTC)

Will do. Hydrogenation (talk) 19:28, 13 June 2021 (UTC)

They are creating more socks than I can count. I'm hitting the sack, trusting you and the others to hold the fort. Thanks! Kingoflettuce (talk) 20:22, 13 June 2021 (UTC)

Park Yeon-mi

This article lists Yeon-mi Park's profession as "Human rights activist". Given her recent involvement in American politics, essentially in defense of hyper-capitalism, and documented history of lies, I am not convinced this is accurate. She is more akin to a political commentator, such as Ben Shapiro or Candace Owens, than any true such human rights activist. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 100.36.1.58 (talk) 21:55, 14 June 2021 (UTC)

Sources in the article refer to her as a "Human rights activist". Also, being a political commentator doesn't mean she can't be a human rights activist. I'd recommend commenting on the article's Talk page if you feel that it should be changed. Hydrogenation (talk) 22:11, 14 June 2021 (UTC)

I've added a new section to the article's talk page. It is a horrendously biased and favorable account. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 100.36.1.58 (talk) 22:52, 14 June 2021 (UTC)

Brian Stock

Hi, this message is for Hydrogenation. I recently made changes to the Wikipedia entry for Brian Stock (historian) and then received a message (the number/ref code is in the subject line). I'd like to clarify that I made these changes at the request of Prof Stock. He sent me a copy of his CV and asked for these changes to be entered on his Wikipedia page. Because his CV is not online or in a published source, it cannot be referenced. I can send you his CV or a copy of the email that he sent to me if you need verification. Could you suggest a way that I could post the summary about him so that it stays? In his view the current summary is disorganized and needs to be changed. Thanks for your help, SP 64.110.237.162 (talk) 22:05, 14 June 2021 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by 64.110.237.162 (talk)

Hey, sorry for the late reply. I think ColinFine and David notMD summed it up well on the Teahouse: Wikipedia's policy on reliable sources and verifiability is that sources have to be published online to be included. You might still be able to find some reliable sources online that you can use if you want to improve the article. Hydrogenation (talk) 15:24, 15 June 2021 (UTC)

P.S. The article does look like it could use some fixing; I would recommend looking through WP:BLP, WP:BIODD, WP:BLPDD, and MOS:BIO if you want to learn how to improve it. Good luck! Hydrogenation (talk) 15:39, 15 June 2021 (UTC)

Against vandalism

In West Bengal economy pagesome foreigner are always doing vandalism and edit the gdp...The actual GDP is 210 billion$ . The link is given there but they always editing it... please lich the edit option with proper data. Huiloko (talk) 15:54, 15 June 2021 (UTC)

I reverted it back. Hydrogenation (talk) 16:02, 15 June 2021 (UTC)

Aaron Turner

Hi, this message is for Hydrogenation. I recently made changes to the Wikipedia entry for Usenet personalities (specifically, Alexander Abian). I'm not sure that I can prove it (other than by searching usenet), but the anecdote that I described was 100% accurate and true (to the best of my recollection). I don't really see how one can judge my (admittedly rather positive) addition to be non-neutral, when the article itself is clearly non-neutral in the way that it describes Professor Abian - from the way the article currently reads, it would be very easy to dismiss him as a crackpot, when in fact he was a very great man, although clearly ill in his old age. As someone who actually interacted with him (albeit only via usenet) while he was still living, I was just trying to restore some balance - otherwise, the way that he is (currently unfairly IMO) recorded on the internet will persist forever. Please consider re-instating my edits. Thank you.

Hey, I'd recommend reading Wikipedia's policy on neutral point of view. The article mostly discusses his eccentric beliefs because that's what most sources discuss about him. He isn't being called a crackpot; instead, the facts are being presented, and the reader may or may not come to that conclusion. In addition, the anecdote must be published by a reliable source to be included. If you still feel like the article needs to be changed, you can leave a message on its talk page. Hydrogenation (talk) 18:24, 15 June 2021 (UTC)

June 2021

Hello. Regarding the recent revert you made to Ninja Turtles: The Next Mutation: you may already know about them, but you might find Wikipedia:Template messages/User talk namespace useful. After a revert, these can be placed on the user's talk page to let them know you considered their edit inappropriate, and also direct new users towards the sandbox. They can also be used to give a stern warning to a vandal when they've been previously warned. Thank you. —FORMALDUDE^(talk) 03:20, 17 June 2021 (UTC)

Hmm, I'm not sure why I didn't give a warning; I usually do. Hydrogenation (talk) 15:17, 17 June 2021 (UTC)

Please refrain from abusing warning or blocking templates, as you did to User talk:193.207.163.243. Doing so is a violation of Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Please use the user warnings sandbox for any tests you may want to do, or take a look at our introduction page to learn more about contributing to the encyclopedia. Thank you. Drill it (talk) 16:16, 18 June 2021 (UTC)

I realized my mistake too late, and apologized on his talk page. I should have realized that the sandbox isn't that large. My apologies. Hydrogenation (talk) 16:18, 18 June 2021 (UTC)

Part of Your World

Hi, this message is for Hydrogenation. I recently made changes to the "Part of Your World" Wikipedia article page. I just saw the latest Apple iPad Pro ad on TV lately and I heard the people on screen singing the song "Part of Your World" the whole time during the ad. I don't really see how you think that the edit I made did not provide a reliable source in the article. I know you removed it and it is archived in the page history for now, and I would like to include a citation and re-add it to the page. In my honest opinion, I would probably think you made a mistake in removing the edit and did not think that the edit on the page requires a reliable source. Please consider re-instating my edits. Thank you.

Sorry for the late response. I just re-added the edit with a citation. On Wikipedia, information needs reliable sources; even if things are true, they need citations to be verifiable. That being said, it is a good inclusion to the article, so thank you for that! Hydrogenation (talk) 15:12, 17 June 2021 (UTC)

Thank you for your anti-vandalism work

		The Anti-Vandalism Barnstar
		I've ran into multiple edit conflicts with you while reverting vandalism. Glad to see your efforts! --littleb2009 (^she/_her) (talk • contribs) 00:49, 18 June 2021 (UTC)

Thank you so much! Hydrogenation (talk) 00:51, 18 June 2021 (UTC)

A kitten for you!

ok it was my younger bro

Speedster21 (talk) 17:35, 18 June 2021 (UTC)

Thanks man

Hope you have a nice life, maybe touch grass once in a while! Be easy man

Dream stan moment Hydrogenation (talk) 23:00, 18 June 2021 (UTC)

Hello.

Now piss off.

Please stop annoying me with your stupid messages

Go be a jerk somewhere else

I appreciate your counter-vandalism efforts!

Wikipedians also recommend biscuits with tea.

Cheerful Squirrel (talk) has given you a cup of tea. Tea promotes WikiLove and hopefully this has made your day ever so slightly better.

Spread the WikiLove by giving someone else a tea, especially if it is someone you have had disagreements with in the past or someone putting up with some stick at this time. Enjoy!

Spread the lovely, warm, refreshing goodness of tea by adding {{subst:wikitea}} to their talk page with a friendly message.

Cheerful Squirrel (talk) 20:02, 19 June 2021 (UTC)

Nice edits

Well I was patrolling recent changes and saw your account and looked you up on x-tools, and according to this you made >3,000 edits in a month... consider taking a wikibreak to prevent getting burnt out, and consider applying for rollbacker or pending changes reviewer permissions, you do have a slight chance of getting rejected due to the 2 warnings above but I'll argue that it's unlikely due to them both being quite minor mistakes. Justiyaya (talk) 18:57, 20 June 2021 (UTC)

Also, if you need a userpage please tell me, I'll make it for you :) Justiyaya (talk) 18:59, 20 June 2021 (UTC)

Thanks for the consideration! I've been thinking about making a userpage, and I probably will soon. Hydrogenation (talk) 19:00, 20 June 2021 (UTC)

A brownie for you!

For the great anti-vandal work you do :)

Justiyaya (talk) 18:58, 20 June 2021 (UTC)

A chicken for you!

For the great plucking you do :)

Child

Recent edit

I recently added detail to a master oogway script involving his full name and it was reverted. I also added specific scene examples to make it more detailed so I was just wondering why my information has been reverted Baty oogway (talk) 23:39, 21 June 2021 (UTC)

Hi, I couldn't find any sources that confirm his full name to be "Grand Baty Master Oogway". If you have a reliable source, feel free to cite it. Hydrogenation (talk) 23:44, 21 June 2021 (UTC)

My reliable source is J.O.E Baty oogway (talk) 00:16, 22 June 2021 (UTC)

Grand Baty Master Oogway

Would you need a link from an article as I am not quite sure what counts as a creditable source as there are many videos and manuscripts of Grand Baty Master Oogway being the full name Baty oogway (talk) 23:58, 21 June 2021 (UTC)

Just doing a quick Google search yields no results, as does the original Kung Fu Panda script, so I doubt that there are any sources that confirm that to be his name. But if you think the source is reliable, and meets the reliability guidelines, then add it. If you're still not sure, you can ask at Wikipedia:Reliable_sources/Noticeboard. Just remember, Wikipedia is not for things made up one day. Hydrogenation (talk) 00:06, 22 June 2021 (UTC)

Thanks for your help

SIKE I LIED. Why you got to be a snake for man do you rly get enjoyment out this. And they r paying y’all for this god damn. I curse you with soggy cereal in the morning and blowjobs with teeth for the rest of your days by the power invested in the notorious baty oogway Baty oogway (talk) 00:15, 22 June 2021 (UTC)

Yeah, yeah, whatever. It was pretty obvious you lied. Have a good rest of your day. Hydrogenation (talk) 00:16, 22 June 2021 (UTC)

Hold this L Baty oogway (talk) 00:17, 22 June 2021 (UTC)

Tea

Wikipedians also recommend biscuits with tea.

Cheerful Squirrel (talk) has given you a cup of tea. Tea promotes WikiLove and hopefully this has made your day ever so slightly better.

Spread the WikiLove by giving someone else a tea, especially if it is someone you have had disagreements with in the past or someone putting up with some stick at this time. Enjoy!

Spread the lovely, warm, refreshing goodness of tea by adding {{subst:wikitea}} to their talk page with a friendly message.

Cheerful Squirrel (talk) 03:14, 23 June 2021 (UTC)

Simone Biles

Would you mind offering your voice to the discussion on the talk page? It seems the other editor is pressing the issue and again reverted my edit. Thanks. SimoneBilesStan (talk) 13:27, 23 June 2021 (UTC)

Ninja Turtles: The next Mutation

The airings said until March 20, 1998. The DVDs have the correct order. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 68.193.175.208 (talk) 20:00, 24 June 2021 (UTC)

Mayberry springs

Why won't you let me update the fact that Mayberry springs has been destroyed by fire in june 2009,why can't I talk about the prestine springs and all of the water that attracted Indians and early settlers for centuries, please explain.Thanks bob Mayberrybob (talk) 21:58, 18 September 2021 (UTC)

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:55, 23 November 2021 (UTC)

The Signpost: 28 December 2021

From the editor: Here is the news

News and notes: Jimbo's NFT, new arbs, fixing RfA, and financial statements

Serendipity: Born three months before her brother?

In the media: The past is not even past

Recent research: STEM articles judged unsuitable for undergraduates below the first paragraph

Arbitration report: A new crew for '22

By the numbers: Four billion words and a few numbers

Deletion report: We laughed, we cried, we closed as "no consensus"

Gallery: Wikicommons presents: 2021

Traffic report: Spider-Man, football and the departed

Crossword: Another Wiki crossword for one and all

Humour: Buying Wikipedia

* Read this Signpost in full * Single-page * Unsubscribe * MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 21:07, 28 December 2021 (UTC)

Important Notice

This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.

You have shown interest in COVID-19, broadly construed. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called discretionary sanctions is in effect. Any administrator may impose sanctions on editors who do not strictly follow Wikipedia's policies, or the page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic.

For additional information, please see the guidance on discretionary sanctions and the Arbitration Committee's decision here. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.

––FormalDude talk 03:42, 10 January 2022 (UTC)