User talk:Hsrinimukesh3
Citable Source Correction[edit]
Hello there. What is "HDLS Interview on Current and Future Studies"? Is it something that is "reliable and published" (in the Wiki-sense, see there), or is it something you did yourself? Thanks. Biosthmors (talk) 03:59, 19 November 2012 (UTC)
- It was information directly obtained from Dr. Dennis W. Dickson through a phone interview. I can alternatively cite the same information from different journals however. Thanks. Hsrinimukesh3 04:39, 19 November 2012 (UTC)
- Yes please! Information on Wikipedia is cited to things that can be verified in published sources that do not require readers to ask for interviews. =) Thanks! Biosthmors (talk) 05:18, 19 November 2012 (UTC)
- That source has been replaced will all cited sources. Hsrinimukesh3 05:33, 19 November 2012 (UTC)
- Thanks. Biosthmors (talk) 04:28, 20 November 2012 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for November 20[edit]
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Hereditary diffuse leukoencephalopathy with spheroids, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Leukoencephalopathy (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:07, 20 November 2012 (UTC)
Peer review[edit]
I see Wikipedia:Peer review/Hereditary diffuse leukoencephalopathy with spheroids/archive3. What's your goal? Do you want to address comments by 7PM EST Wednesday only or also after? Please also sign (see WP:CHEAT) the peer review page. Thanks. Biosthmors (talk) 23:48, 26 November 2012 (UTC)
- It was mainly for the Wednesday deadline, but I took it off my article for now. I think I'll put it back and sign it properly when the assignment is over. My feedback mainly focused on some jargon not being explained clearly. Where in the article do you most see this an issue? Hsrinimukesh3 (talk) 21:54, 27 November 2012 (UTC)
- If you're definitely planning on addressing them, you can leave the peer review open until it closes itself (after weeks or maybe a month or so). I was just asking that you sign talk page posts per the instructions in the cheatsheet, that's all. =) Or were you asking me for feedback on the article itself? Biosthmors (talk) 21:57, 27 November 2012 (UTC)
- Yeah I know what you mean. I know that the article could be a lot stronger with others making edits, but I don't want to risk getting content cut with the size criterion for the assignment. I was asking for feedback yeah if you have some time. Hsrinimukesh3 (talk) 21:59, 27 November 2012 (UTC)
- I wouldn't worry about that. Peer reviewers typically only make minor edits and suggest that you make the major ones. I think you could add an Epidemiology section per WP:MEDMOS for diseases. What's the size criterion? Thanks. Biosthmors (talk) 22:02, 27 November 2012 (UTC)
- I'll plan on commenting further at the peer review then. Biosthmors (talk) 22:03, 27 November 2012 (UTC)
- I realized my classification section was the Epidemiology section. I had just labeled it differently. I've updated that and put the peer review back on.Hsrinimukesh3 (talk)
- I commented at the peer review, FYI. Best. Biosthmors (talk) 04:12, 28 November 2012 (UTC)
- I realized my classification section was the Epidemiology section. I had just labeled it differently. I've updated that and put the peer review back on.Hsrinimukesh3 (talk)
- I'll plan on commenting further at the peer review then. Biosthmors (talk) 22:03, 27 November 2012 (UTC)
- I wouldn't worry about that. Peer reviewers typically only make minor edits and suggest that you make the major ones. I think you could add an Epidemiology section per WP:MEDMOS for diseases. What's the size criterion? Thanks. Biosthmors (talk) 22:02, 27 November 2012 (UTC)
- Yeah I know what you mean. I know that the article could be a lot stronger with others making edits, but I don't want to risk getting content cut with the size criterion for the assignment. I was asking for feedback yeah if you have some time. Hsrinimukesh3 (talk) 21:59, 27 November 2012 (UTC)
- If you're definitely planning on addressing them, you can leave the peer review open until it closes itself (after weeks or maybe a month or so). I was just asking that you sign talk page posts per the instructions in the cheatsheet, that's all. =) Or were you asking me for feedback on the article itself? Biosthmors (talk) 21:57, 27 November 2012 (UTC)
- And as I said at the peer review "I hope these comments are useful, and I hope you can continue to improve the article when you have time, even if it is after Wednesday the 28th." But of course, that's your choice! Wikipedia is not compulsory. Best wishes. Biosthmors (talk) 04:23, 28 November 2012 (UTC)
- I replied at the peer review. Biosthmors (talk) 18:35, 30 November 2012 (UTC)
- And as I said at the peer review "I hope these comments are useful, and I hope you can continue to improve the article when you have time, even if it is after Wednesday the 28th." But of course, that's your choice! Wikipedia is not compulsory. Best wishes. Biosthmors (talk) 04:23, 28 November 2012 (UTC)