User talk:HertsHistorian

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

HertsHistorian, you are invited to the Teahouse[edit]

Teahouse logo

Hi HertsHistorian! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia. Please join other people who edit Wikipedia at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space on Wikipedia where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from peers and experienced editors. I hope to see you there! Writ Keeper (I'm a Teahouse host)

This message was delivered automatically by your friendly neighborhood HostBot (talk) 04:34, 5 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome[edit]

Hello HertsHistorian, and Welcome to Wikipedia!

Welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you enjoy the encyclopedia and want to stay. As a first step, you may wish to read the Introduction.

If you have any questions, feel free to ask me at my talk page — I'm happy to help. Or, you can ask your question at the New contributors' help page.


Here are some more resources to help you as you explore and contribute to the world's largest encyclopedia...

Finding your way around:

Need help?

How you can help:

Additional tips...

HertsHistorian, good luck, and have fun. --Pharaoh of the Wizards (talk) 03:14, 6 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

A barnstar for you![edit]

The Copyeditor's Barnstar
Thank you for all the work you did at Colin Coulthard! §FreeRangeFrogcroak 00:21, 11 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Many thanks for your kind gesture! HertsHistorian (talk) 01:36, 18 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Re: War Horse Edit April 8, 2013[edit]

Hi HertsHistorian, and welcome to Wikipedia. In regards as to where you should ask about edits, you should do it on an editor's usertalk page if the matter is more of a personal nature (like, 'hey, Jack, you be an ass-hat, yo'). If its more about the article itself, then you can use the article talk page (like, 'pardon me, Jack, but that edit summary you posted was most disconcerting').
As for the revert, it would appear that I should have looked at your edit more closely, and assisted you in putting it in the right place. We do not typically put cited information into the plot summary (as per WP:PLOT), because it is not usually required; the plot is the agreed-upon experience from all viewers. Where it gets tricky is when some pulls out a pistol and trick-shoots a clown by ricocheting it off a mirror, a frying pan and a Republican. We can agree that the trick shot took place, but more precise information, like the make an model of the pistol or frying pan or whether the Republican should be shot more than once requires us to provide a reference where a reliable source points out that the pistol used was a so-and-so and that yes, the Tea Partier should be riddled with bullets. As editors we aren't allowed to draw conclusions (even though we clearly have them); we have to use citable references to distance ourselves professionally and legally from the implications of those statements. I can explain that more if you want, but I think you get the point.
Your information is excellently cited, and it is an outgrowth of the movie, and we should treat it as such. I would suggest that you add the information about the regimental groupings in the section "Reception" or "Popular culture". Include the citation as well, using the templates located in the working area. If you want some help with that, feel free to ask. :) - Jack Sebastian (talk) 00:34, 9 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:58, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open![edit]

Hello, HertsHistorian. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2017 election voter message[edit]

Hello, HertsHistorian. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]