User talk:Herr Matheus

Bergen County census data

This edit for Bergen County, New Jersey has some problems. It's a county, not a city. The population density is probably not 3.874 per square mile. But how are you extracting the data from the website and formatting it for Wikipedia? Alansohn (talk) 23:04, 19 January 2022 (UTC)

Hey,

Thanks for let me know, I'm using a base text and wasn't paying attention to that, I have fixed on more recent edits.

I'll take a look into the data one more time and let you know.  Confirmed

Thank you! M. (talk) 23:23, 19 January 2022 (UTC)

So I've took a look, the correct density would be 4.101,85/sq mi, not 3.874/sq mi. Housing density would be 1.576,75/sq mi

I'm using either the 2020 Decennial or 2019 ACS 1-Year since 2020 is not available on some tables. (Source is available here)

Do you agree or is this also wrong.  Feedback required M. (talk) 23:34, 19 January 2022 (UTC)

Cias. Automotivas em História - Brasil

Olá Senhor Matheus,

Estou lhe lembrando que agurdo seu parecer entre eu continuar sendo o principal na manufatura da lista ou se o senhor prefere tomar a rédia e eu me retirar. Vale lembrar que aind ficou erros ao digitar no explicativo, mas nada vou pedir mil e um perdoes por isto. Ao meu ver aqueles lembretes iniciais que pôs enfeiou tudo e totalmente denecessário, se o senhor achou a parte custom e pequena quantidade de protótipos como disse mist, que ficou ma bosta ou merda, lamento que troianos e gregos possam nada gostar. Achei que seria uma boa referência mas se se destoar no modo pensativo que bolei para adequar todos os casos, sempre tenho em pauta a lexicar Brasil, que já tem tudo muito bem explicado, na verdade só tinha pego a oportunidade nisso que já rola uns 3 meses para passar no internacional inglês.... FICO NO AGUARDO DE SUA DECISAO ! citacao a mim tem importânci quase que nenhuma ... a mim vale mais a experiência do dia a dia, de leituras e da vida no texto que isso de citar blogs e jornalecos de gente com menor info ... se me pergunta se me emputece, sim, a wikipedia é uma bosta devido a isto. Poderia ser infinitamente melhor mas é totalmente falha e incompleta https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Automotive_industry_in_Brazil --92.218.124.109 (talk) 18:19, 28 January 2022 (UTC)

Vamos começar que a página virou bagunça e eu me posicionei diversas vezes, inclusive na Página de Discussão e em sumários anteriores.

Sua reversão foi abusiva, toda alteração feita por mim foi devida, corrigindo pequenos erros, e inserindo citação quando devido. Como você mesmo disse "Eu ainda estou trabalhando a lista, que ainda precisa ser terminada", minha edição teria, em suma, facilitado seu progresso, além de ter adicionado outras informações ao artigo.  Needs discussion

SUMÁRIO ADICIONADO: [...] OICA changed to English to better comprehension, the full company name is not needed (terms of legal structure such as Inc., LTDA, S.A., and others don't need to be displayed on most cases - A idéia, como dita em texto, é permitir que a agência possa ser facilmente identificada por leitores da língua do artigo, existem outras formas de melhorar isso, considerarei no futuro.

JUSTIFICATIVA RESPOSTA: Bem Matheus, até agora tinha apreciando alguma interferência sua, mas agora exagerou (como, eu me pergunto), Segundo a Lexicar Brasil, Ltda. e S.A. pertencem aos nomes das companhias menores, que podem ser com sociedade na bolsa ou simplesmente pequena de caráter particular.

 Note: Note que LTDA. e S.A. não visa o tamanho de uma entidade, já que maioria das marcas no brasil usam LTDA. Exemplo: BMW DO BRASIL LTDA., mas ninguém usa tal atribuição para descrevê-las - "Bmw do Brasil LTDA. Lança novo veículo" -, por ser uma informação desnecessária, sem valor agregado ao tópico.

Ressalto que suas edições são bem vindas mas sugiro a divisão do artigo para melhor refletir no mercado atual e passado do BRASIL.

A seguintes mudanças foram feitas por mim e revertidas por você (92.218.124.109) sem base ideal para tal mudança, já que são informações reais e verificáveis, com baixo índice de erro e efetivando pequenas correções ao disposto:

• Rolls- ... such as BMW Group (BMW, Mini, Rolls Royce Imported) - ERRADO, Rolls-Royce é vendida pela Via Itália no Brasil (citação devidamente posta), e deve ser tratada de tal forma, até porque a Porsche é da VW, nem por isso é vendido pelo GRUPO VW no BRASIL.
• Indústrias Romi S.A. ex Romi Isetta (BMW) - Informação equivocada, a empresa nunca pertenceu a BMW, tendo feito apenas parceria no passado; uso de abreviação.
• "EX" para retratar FORMER/FORMALLY - Uso de abreviação, incorreto de acordo com o MoS. Como em: Carbuss ex Busscar, ex Mercedes-Benz Cars & Vans Brasil, ETC
• Empresa Ltda. / Empresa S.A. - Uso de formação corporativa desnecessário, toda empresa é formada por alguma sigla, que para o contexto, significa sua formação estratégica e/ou regional.

/* Passenger cars currently offered & manufactured in Brazil in large Scale */ HONDA acaba de retirar modelos do mercado, a reversão não reflete nisso e acaba tirando pequenas melhorias.

• Some companies rely on local distributors to import their vehicles, such as Rolls Royce and Porsche, but brands with local factories, such as Honda and Chevrolet may also rely on importing some of its models. - Tal parágrafo serve para dar ênfase que companhias como Porsche e RR, apesar de pertencerem a outros grupos, não são vendidos pelos mesmos, a prática de importação também é usado por marcas com operação no Brasil, tal como Jeep, VW, Chevrolet e a maioria das marcas de luxo.
• Organisation Internationale des Constructeurs d'Automobiles PARA International Organization of Motor Vehicle Manufacturers - A mudança visa atender a língua do artigo, o nome é incorporado pela própria OICA, o que pode ser feito é usar ambos os nomes
• Tem uma lógica por trás da lista, tipo equenas séries ou só um protótipo ou tentativa de venda... mas posso largar isto - SUGERIDO o SPLIT do artigo, cabe a administração do Projeto.

Erro por erro?! Má conduta, que feio!  Feedback required

[...] mas nada vou pedir mil e um perdoes por isto [PT-PT?].

[...] Ao meu ver aqueles lembretes iniciais que pôs enfeiou tudo e totalmente denecessário[...]

[...] que ficou ma bosta ou merda, lamento que troianos e gregos possam nada gostar.[...]

[...] citacao a mim tem importânci quase que nenhuma ... a mim vale mais a experiência do dia a dia, de leituras e da vida no texto que isso de citar blogs e jornalecos de gente com menor info [...]

[...] se me pergunta se me emputece, sim, a wikipedia é uma bosta devido a isto.[...]

Me disponho a trabalhar em conjunto para terminar a inclusão de novas "velhas" marcas, mas a bagunça que está, atualmente, limita o alcance do tópico desse artigo. A inclusão de marcas sem, ou com baixo reconhecimento e prova de efetivação de projeto, não leva a lugar algum, uma marca que reparava ou modificava carroceria não faz parte da industria automotiva, propriamente dita, mas não deixa de ser importante, só - na minha opinião - não cabe ao artigo em questão.  Second opinion requested

 Note: Evite desfazer edições boas de usuários registrados e comprometidos com a interface do artigo, sem um bom motivo, se abstenha de fazer comentário racista e/ou xenofóbico, uma edição de um usuário Indiano é tão bem vinda quanto a de um Chinês ou de um Americano.

TODA EDIÇÃO É BEM VINDA, mas esse artigo não é só seu, como lembrou Andra

Possíveis endereços IP usado pelo mesmo usuário: 188.109.177.165, 92.218.124.109, 88.68.182.14, 90.186.219.36, 90.186.239.156, 188.109.177.231, 92.218.124.109; Provável usuário: Ecangola

Content dispute. Consider dispute resolution. M. (talk) 20:25, 28 January 2022 (UTC)  Resolved  IP blocked

O brasil é seu, use e abuse dele como quiser.... Boa sorte https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:SpinningCeres#Information

General Motors do Brasil

Your edit summary was misleading at best as you removed the legal name that was ACTUALLY SOURCED and replaced it the common name. In the English-language Wikipedia, we use the legal name. I know the German-language Wikipedia doesn't but I'm personally not that impress with the work they do over there as most articles are poorly souced (like here) and are outdated/full of hoaxes... --Urbanoc (talk) 12:48, 11 February 2022 (UTC)

I know that, but almost every single page have their legal status, such INC. and LTDA. at the introductory scope, not the template (I have not included that information to be honest); GM don't even have such status (GMC have; not sourced), neither Ford (but they have Company in their name);

A template box (or info box) with this info plus a source at the end isn't very common. The source is complete outdated and unnecessary BTW.

Please let me know. Best regards, M. (talk) 18:11, 11 February 2022 (UTC)

I see. I appreciate you clarified why you removed the source and the legal name. In response, I'll say two things:

a) Sources are necessary if the information is likely to be challenged. And, as you just removed it, we can safely assume the legal name can be challenged in this case. Some people include the sources in footnotes at the end of the infobox to avoid the clutter, if you want to do that.

b) Both Ford and GM do include the legal name in the infobox. The GMC one is indeed bad, it ignores a lot of policies and guidelines, but we aim to improve things. Today, most company articles I come across do include the legal name in the infobox, although some don't do it indeed. When there's no legal name, most of the time the articles that don't include it are of two types: either articles covering entities other that proper companies (such as divisions, chaebol, and marques) or articles on small/niche/subsidiary companies, many of which are edited by small-time editors, COI editors and/or people from other Wikipedias. Those articles have generally a lot of problems besides ignoring a single guideline. In any case, I don't see the point on removing the legal name just to get in line with a bunch of articles ignoring a guideline. If the article doesn't have the proper legal name, it's not the end of the world, but we don't need to follow that as the rule...--Urbanoc (talk) 21:23, 11 February 2022 (UTC)

Thank you for replying,

I am assuming there's no problem removing the name of the infobox and replacing it in the text (Brand XYZ Inc. is a ...) or the company status must be in both, the majority have a double status (article and infobox/template), which I'll follow in the future since appear to be the basic stuff;

Regarding

most of the time the articles that don't include it are of two types: either articles covering entities other that proper companies (such as divisions, chaebol, and marques) or articles on small/niche/subsidiary companies, many of which are edited by small-time editors''

Am I safe to assume that the legal name ("status") is not necessary to describe division, subsidiaries, marques, etc.?!

Wiki is tricky with a 'steep learning curve' and sometimes, hidden policies and useful content, so not to get boring; IF you could (or want) to comment on some real useful tips and rules I'll appreciate (can be the general page, don't need to explain the rules 🙃)

In any case that helped a lot.  Thank you very much! M. (talk) 00:53, 12 February 2022 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for February 26

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Automotive industry in Brazil, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page IPI. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 06:06, 26 February 2022 (UTC)

Brazilian Highway System

Just so you understand, I didn't pull accident data from the article because of some personal opinion of mine. I removed it because it has nothing to do with the subject. Accidents on the roads basically do not happen because of the road, but because of the behavior of drivers. The overwhelming majority of accidents are caused by: a drunk driver, a driver who sleeps at the wheel, a driver who makes the wrong pass in a single lane and performs a frontal collision, a reckless driver (who talks on a cell phone behind the wheel, for example), a driver who does not perform maintenance on the own vehicle and it breaks down on the road. So I ask: what does the road have to do with it? The number of accidents on the same road can be radically different if you change drivers on it. The number of accidents will be exponentially higher if you put 100% drunk drivers. if you include a lot of 30-year-old women, who according to statistics are extremely careful, the number of accidents will be very low. So, putting data on the number of accidents on a road is not relevant when you want to talk about a road. this is a matter for other areas, such as public health. There are few highways in the world that really push the driver into an accident, like an unpaved highway in the Bolivian or Peruvian Andes, which borders an abyss and from which you can fall. Otherwise. the road does not cause accidents, it is the driver. 177.142.132.73 (talk) 15:59, 2 March 2022 (UTC)

So if a highway has alarming numbers of deaths, partly due to lack of maintenance, standardization and technical malpractice, the information shouldn't be cited for being "inconclusive" since human factor (on both sides) is a thing?!

BTW, I never said that your opinion was put ahead of the matter, only that it could be inconsistent with the desired transparency, or biased to hide daunt data (not an accusation), especially considering that there are no dedicated pages (as in Motor vehicle fatality rate in U.S. by year) for Brazilian traffic death rate (at least none that I read about).

I really appreciate the feedback and will use on further projects. Thank you

Herr Matheus (talk) 20:21, 2 March 2022 (UTC)

The question is: do you know how many % of deaths occur due to "lack of maintenance, standardization and technical malpractice"? That percentage is much lower than people think. The preponderant factor for the overwhelming majority of accidents is the behavior of the driver - the highway is stopped there without moving, it is not its fault that the driver drinks a mountain of alcoholic beverage, drives 20 straight hours or invades the opposite lane and hits another car going in the opposite direction. So, this kind of data only seems relevant, but in fact, it's not, even more so because we're here analyzing the highway, and not the human beings who screw up on it. 177.142.132.73 (talk) 20:47, 2 March 2022 (UTC)

Does it matter how many people die, and how they die? If someone dies on a highway, it should be accounted for, its statistics, even if it's someone else's fault. Is there a ruling against this (MoS), let me know, but I, personally, think it's a good addition.

Brazil is yet to implement a report system to evaluate accident and death conditions (it's delayed tho), for example, was the road properly signalized? was the vehicle? was the driver (any) drunk? did the driver react prior to the accident? location of the accident? gender and age (prob. already in use)? AND SO ON...

Regards,

Herr Matheus (talk) 21:39, 2 March 2022 (UTC)

ITA Transportes Aéreos

After some 5 months on a limbo, on May 5, 2022 ANAC revoked permanently the company´s AOC. It may be thus considered officially defunct. Here is a reference [1]. BRGDS, Brunoptsem (talk) 15:39, 5 May 2022 (UTC)

Yes, I'm aware of it, in any case, my last revision was on May 3

Thanks for letting me know anyway :), Herr Matheus (talk) 01:41, 14 May 2022 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for July 12

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited GPA (company), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page SEC.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:25, 12 July 2022 (UTC)

Novonor/Odebrecht

Make your case for the name of the Brazilian company at the Talk page, and try to gain consensus for your point of view. Trying to hide a stealth unilateral change under a misleading edit summary about "improving refs" and "copyediting", is not the way. Transparency, open collaboration, and consensus is. Mathglot (talk) 05:06, 14 July 2022 (UTC)

Is this justified to revert a FY Result and updated subsidiaries?!

The official ("commonname") article name remains Odebrecht, also Odebrecht is NOT "officially known as Novonor", Novonor don't want to be correlated with Odebrecht;

Any official Fiscal Statement should be update, as I did, or a Novonor page should be created;

Anyway Regards, Herr Matheus (talk) 05:16, 14 July 2022 (UTC)

Lol, given the immense amount of non-stop scandal associated with Odebrecht over many years, I'm not surprised that "Novonor" doesn't want to be known as "Odebrecht". However, that is how all the world knows them. If you disagree, start a Move request at the talk page. Mathglot (talk) 10:08, 14 July 2022 (UTC)

You can keep the names, but keeping old data is very misleading, but who cares; Herr Matheus (talk) 23:33, 15 July 2022 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for September 11

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Popeyes, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page SEC.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:06, 11 September 2022 (UTC)

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:24, 29 November 2022 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for June 16

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Fundo de Garantia do Tempo de Serviço, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Fund.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:02, 16 June 2023 (UTC)

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:45, 28 November 2023 (UTC)

Embraer profit

Hey, you stated that Embraer made a profit of US$43.5 million in 2021. But actually that figure was a loss of US$43.5 million. A number stated in parentheses means, that it's minus.

https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Embraer&diff=prev&oldid=1093910402

https://www.edrmagazine.eu/wp-content/uploads/2022/03/Embraer-Full-Year-2021.pdf on page 10 WikiPate (talk) 21:23, 25 March 2024 (UTC)

You're right, thanks for letting me know! Herr Matheus (talk) 02:21, 26 March 2024 (UTC)