User talk:Hasek is the best/Archive2006

This page is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page.

Welcome!

Hello, Hasek is the best, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome! -- JamesTeterenko 01:22, 1 August 2006 (UTC)

{{unsourced}} tag

Please don't remove maintenance tags from an article, unless it has undergone the proper fixes. Thanks. --Madchester 06:49, 2 August 2006 (UTC)

After being warned, you removed three tags from the same article. The article did not have the proper fixes, and there was no discussion about removing the tags before you did so. Please do not do this again. --Muéro 02:35, 3 August 2006 (UTC)

Patrick Roy

Please read Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy, which all articles must follow. Wikipedia is a neutral, verifiable encyclopedia; it is not a place to argue a particular point of view. Thank you. --Madchester 06:51, 2 August 2006 (UTC)

Hasek photos

Please stop uploading copyrighted photos. See WP:IMAGE for more details. Thanks. --Madchester 16:41, 2 August 2006 (UTC)

Please refrain from undoing other people's edits repeatedly. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia under the three-revert rule, which states that nobody may revert a single page more than three times in 24 hours. (Note: this also means editing the page to reinsert an old edit. If the effect of your actions is to revert back, it qualifies as a revert.) Thank you. -- JamesTeterenko 04:19, 3 August 2006 (UTC)

Your edits to Dominik Hasek

You are in danger of violating the three-revert rule on a page. Please cease further reverts or you may be blocked from further editing. scsgoal31 04:21, 3 August 2006 (UTC)

This is your last warning. The next time you violate Wikipedia's NPOV rule by inserting commentary or your personal analysis into an article, as you did to Dominik Hašek, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. -- JamesTeterenko 04:33, 3 August 2006 (UTC)

Waaaaaaaah!!! How long will the ban be for?-hasek is the the best

You are not yet blocked. However, if you do not stop your edits to the Hasek page you will be. Please spend some time reading over the policy pages before you continue reinserting the non-encyclopedic information. -- JamesTeterenko 04:39, 3 August 2006 (UTC)

Magazine and newspaper articles can be used as sources and references, but not as external links. --Wafulz 16:08, 3 August 2006 (UTC)

Exactly. People (maybe u) deletes when Gretzky said Hasek was the greatest living player. It IS true, from a magazine, and other sources I don't know about.-hasek is the best-12:12pm-3 August 2006 (UTC)

This is your last warning. The next time you vandalize a page, as you did to Dominik Hasek, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. This includes copyright violations and repeatedly making unsourced claims. --Wafulz 16:21, 3 August 2006 (UTC)\

!!!! GEEZ!!! IT'S SOURCED FROM A MAGAZINE, NAMED "the hockey news", OKAY, Wafulz!!!!!!! -hasek is the best 3 August (UTC)

Please read the help pages linked to at the top of this page, especially the five pillars of Wikipedia. There's no point in you putting in time and effort just to see your edits be reverted. This is also costing other editors time and effort (for they must fix your errors) that should be used improving the article. I know you have good intentions, and I'm not suggesting that you give up on being a Wikipedian, but please discover how to make good edits before editing. --Muéro 16:58, 4 August 2006 (UTC)

You have been blocked from editing for violating Wikipedia policy against WP:NPOV. To contest this block, please reply here on your talk page by adding the text {{unblock}} along with the reason you believe the block is unjustified, or email the blocking administrator or any administrator from this list. Roy A.A. 00:10, 6 August 2006 (UTC)

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Hasek is the best (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I didn't even get a warning! It just came up out of nowhere. How am I supposed to know something I write violates NPOV all the time???!!! Maybe YOU should be blocked for a no-warning block!! Waaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaahhhhhhhhhhhh!!!!!!!!!!! Hasek is the best 00:16, 6 August 2006 (UTC)

Decline reason:

Its only 24 hours.. go sleep or go outside and play street hockey... Sasquatch t

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

So? The point is that...oh. your not that Royboy guy. But still, he didn't give me a warning! Tell me if you decline (please, please don't! PLEASE! I'm innocent! I learned my lesson! I beg of you!

Talk page comments

Please do not remove other users' comments per WP:TPG (i.e., this violation [1]). --Madchester 20:37, 3 August 2006 (UTC) LISTEN!!! IT IS SOURCED!

Stop

Please don't add copyrighted text to Wikipedia
We appreciate your contribution to the article Dominik Hasek, but we cannot accept copyrighted text borrowed from other web sites or printed material. Please see Wikipedia:Copyright problems for more information on this topic, or generally, Wikipedia:Policies and guidelines. Please do not remove any copyright violation notice placed in the article or repost the suspected infringing text.

You are in danger of violating the three-revert rule on a page. Please cease further reverts or you may be blocked from further editing.

Seriously, stop editing the Hasek article until you understand why your edits are NOT ALLOWED at Wikipedia. scsgoal31 22:39, 3 August 2006 (UTC)

Can I re-write the same paragraph(s)?-Hasek is the best 01:03, 4 August 2006 (UTC) I'm only 11!!!! and how do you know I write copyrighted paragraphs? I don't!!!

I checked out [2]. I couldn't help but notice that its a verbatim copy of what you were adding to his article. THAT is how we know you're plagiarizing. And quit excusing yourself by declaring that you are only 11. Do you want us to treat you based on you age? Or do you want us to treat you based on the useful contributions you are capable of. If its the latter, I suggest you read WP:WELCOME, WP:POLICY, WP:COPY, and WP:CITE. ccwaters 17:15, 4 August 2006 (UTC)

mmmm......... I'll just use the webpage as a link. Hasek is the best

Citing sources

I noticed that you tried to cite a source on the Dominik Hašek page. However, you did not do so correctly. You then tried repeatedly to fix it. Please read the help article about citing sources before trying to do so again. Also, if you would preview your edits before saving the changes, you would realize that you did not get the desired results. I would recommend previewing the results on all of your edits, especially until you become an experienced Wikipedian. Again, please read as many of the help pages as possible, especially before trying to cite sources. --Muéro 04:20, 5 August 2006 (UTC)

Sources

Please read this to find out how to cite sources. It's a little more work than saying something and throwing an article at the bottom of the page. --Wafulz 14:52, 5 August 2006 (UTC)

List of Hasek's

The material in this article does not meet the usual conventions for format or title. I believe what you're trying to accomplish is already at the page Hasek, which allows people to find articles for people of that name. If there are any missing from that list, feel free to add them. I will note, however, that being the child of a hockey player does not confer notability, so Dominika and Michal really only belong as mentions in their father's article. Fan-1967 18:27, 5 August 2006 (UTC)

I have a question

Now, this might be a bit unusual, but there should be a box on every page that includes expicit material. The box can say "Warning: this article contains inappropriate material and is suggested that younger viewers do not view the page due to its content" or something like that. I'm asking cause I don't know how to ask a question, or how to contact Jimbo Wales or something. I'm just suggesting it. ~Thanks~ Hasek is the best 02:32, 30 October 2006 (UTC)

This has been proposed many times before and rejected. See also Wikipedia:No disclaimer templates. —Centrx→talk • 02:35, 30 October 2006 (UTC)

| I don't know how to ask a question, or how to contact Jimbo Wales

To ask a Wikipedia-related question, post it at the help desk, to ask a knowledge based question, see the reference desk. To get editing help use {{helpme}}, and to contact Jimbo, leave a message on his talk page :) — D e on555 ^talk_Review 02:40, 30 October 2006 (UTC)

Barnstar

		The Original Barnstar
		For your hardwork and dedication to making Wikipedia a better place. I, Sharkface217, award you this Original Barnstar. Good job! :-)Sharkface217 04:27, 1 November 2006 (UTC)

Cool! Nice to hear I'm a good contributor.

Dominik Hašek

What exactly is there for "us" to see in the 2000 retirement? --Wafulz 22:14, 5 November 2006 (UTC)

To see what I put down about the thing why he wanted to retire. Hasek is the best 22:36, 5 November 2006 (UTC)

WikiProject Munich

Would you be interested in helping out atWikiProject Munich? And you don't have to know anything about Munich. Maybe you could help out on bringing Munich-related articles up to Wikipedia Policies and guidlines standards or maybe another area where you could help improve Munich-related articles. Kingjeff 22:34, 18 November 2006 (UTC)

Sorry, I don't want to. I only like focusing on hockey related articles. Hasek is the best 03:54, 19 November 2006 (UTC)

who deleted my article 'NHL cards' and why?

Like the title said, who deleted the page 'NHL Cards' and why? It's OK if nobody responds cause most people wouldn't know. Hasek is the best 21:24, 26 November 2006 (UTC)

It was not deleted it was Redirected, probably because it was more of a game guide than an article. However do not be discouraged it is not your fault...This happens to everybody every once and a while. Keep up the good work.__Seadog ^♪ 21:27, 26 November 2006 (UTC)

Okay. Hasek is the best 21:29, 26 November 2006 (UTC)

Hello

Which article are you referring to? I tried to go through the history of articles I had deleted and I didn't see any of yours. Let me know and I'll look into it. As for "my article", please do not take ownership of articles. It's a slippery slope. --Woohookitty^(meow) 13:50, 27 November 2006 (UTC)

I thought I did name it. It's named either 'Foot Hockey' or 'NHL Cards'. Sorry for not mentioning what the title was. Check it. Hasek is the best 03:26, 28 November 2006 (UTC)

It's been restored. --Woohookitty^(meow) 05:58, 30 November 2006 (UTC)

Thanks. Hasek is the best 21:18, 30 November 2006 (UTC)

Ottawa Senators

Adding the link to Senators official website 'roster', is a great idea. Recommend you add links on the other 29 NHL team pages (to their respective official websites roster). PS- Too bad 'the Dominator's' time as a Senator was so brief. GoodDay 20:30, 16 December 2006 (UTC)

Okay. It shouldn't take that long to do. I'll start now. Yeah, it is a good idea...Hasek is the best 02:45, 17 December 2006 (UTC)

Wall Paper Collages

Please don't upload anymore of you Wallpaper collages. They violate WP:IMAGE and WP:COPY. thanks. ccwaters 20:18, 29 December 2006 (UTC)

Image copyright problem with Image:WP10.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:WP10.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 13:36, 31 December 2006 (UTC)