User talk:Harriet Harperson

CfD nomination of Category:Harriet Harman[edit]

I have nominated Category:Harriet Harman (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs) for deletion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at the discussion page. Thank you. BrownHairedGirl (talk) • (contribs) 20:45, 28 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletion of Template:Harriet Harman[edit]

Template:Harriet Harman has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Thank you. Off2riorob (talk) 18:43, 4 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletion of Template:Peter Mandelson[edit]

Template:Peter Mandelson has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Thank you. ShawnIsHere (talk) 00:24, 7 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

April 2010[edit]

Please do not delete content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Labour Party (UK), without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear constructive, and has been reverted. Please make use of the sandbox if you'd like to experiment with test edits. Thank you. Please discuss this on the article's Talk page, as previously advised. Rodhull andemu 14:33, 7 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not add or change content without citing verifiable and reliable sources, as you did to Floella Benjamin. Before making any potentially controversial edits, it is recommended that you discuss them first on the article's talk page. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. Off2riorob (talk) 16:45, 7 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of The Nasty Party[edit]

Please refrain from introducing inappropriate pages, such as The Nasty Party, to Wikipedia. Doing so is not in accordance with our policies. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. Road Wizard (talk) 20:05, 18 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Harriet Harperson. You have new messages at Road Wizard's talk page.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

cat creation[edit]

Please stop it, you are new and your creations appear to have no support, if you continue along this path editing restrictions could follow, take your time and discuss more. Regards. Off2riorob (talk) 20:26, 18 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Harman family[edit]

A tag has been placed on Category:Harman family, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G4 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion debate, such as at articles for deletion. Under the specified criteria, where an article has substantially identical content to that of an article deleted after debate, and any changes in the content do not address the reasons for which the material was previously deleted, it may be deleted at any time.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. Off2riorob (talk) 20:57, 18 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The Nasty Party[edit]

I have deleted this, yet again. There are several things wrong with it: (1) The term is unsourced, and even if it were, you would have to show that it is uniquely associated with the UK Conservative Party and no other; (2) it is not a neutral term (3) it is an unlikely search term for anyone seeking the article on the Conservative Party (and I notice you haven't created "The Stupid Party", which I have also seen them called - but please don't be tempted). Since you've recreated it, I've prevented its recreation by any editor other than an Admin unless you can gain consensus for it to be created. Your edits are getting disruptive, and I note that it is not just I who am losing patience with your edits. If in doubt, please ask. Rodhull andemu 19:13, 19 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Nasty Party[edit]

The article Nasty Party has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

WP:NEO

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{dated prod}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Cptmurdok (talk) 17:41, 22 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I've deleted this again, for several reasons, most of which I stated above. Its worst fault was that, completely unsourced, it read as an attack page on a group of people, and individuals- this is unacceptable, per policy on biographies. More so, as we are in the run-up to a General Election, it read as soapboxing, which is equally unacceptable. I suggest that if you really think that this topic has a chance of being an acceptable article here, you recreate it in your userspace with reliable sources, before moving it into public view (which includes that of the media). I'll say this once only: if you recreate that article, or anything like it, it will be deleted and you will be blocked from editing. This is not a free speech issue; it's an issue of reliable sources, encyclopedic treatment, and neutrality, which so far I consider you to be lacking. Thanks. Rodhull andemu

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although we invite everyone to contribute constructively here, we would like to remind you not to attack other editors, as you did with this edit to User talk:Rodhullandemu. You may wish to read the introduction to editing for more information about Wikipedia. Thank you. Alan (talk) 12:34, 24 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

This account has been blocked indefinitely from editing Wikipedia because your username, Harriet Harperson, does not meet our username policy.

Your username is the only reason for this block. You are welcome to choose a new username (see below).

A username should not be promotional, related to a "real-world" group or organization, misleading, offensive, or disruptive. Also, usernames may not end in the word "bot" unless the account is an approved bot account.

Please choose a new account name that meets our policy guidelines. However, do not create a new account if you wish to credit your existing contributions to a new name through a username change. To request a username change:

Add {{unblock-un|your new username here}} on your user talk page. You should be able to edit this talk page even though you are blocked. If not, you may wish to contact the blocking administrator by clicking on "E-mail this user" on their talk page.
At an administrator's discretion, you may be unblocked for 24 hours to file a request.
Please note that you may only request a name that is not already in use, so please check here for a list of names that have already been taken. For more information, please see Wikipedia:Changing username.

If you feel that you were blocked in error, you may appeal this block by adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here}} below, but you should read our guide to appealing blocks first. Spartaz ^Humbug! 19:29, 29 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Specifically, your username is an obviously pointed reference to Harriet Harmen so you need to find something less POV to edit under. Spartaz ^Humbug! 19:30, 29 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

CfD nomination of Category:Harman family[edit]

I have nominated Category:Harman family (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs) for deletion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at the discussion page. Thank you. Robofish (talk) 00:17, 12 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]