User talk:Harlander211

Inside[edit]

What you need is references in reliable sources (newspapers, magazines, TV/radio coverage, etc.) which demonstrates that the film is notable enough to be included here. I can see that if I do a Google search on "inside social media film", such references do exist — just in the first two pages, I see The Guardian, Fast Company and Wired, which are all excellent examples of the kind of sources we're actually looking for — but you didn't actually cite any of them; apart from the film's own website and social media links, the only "references" you included at all were the commercial webpages of the specific brand of laptop that's actually in the film, and the specific CPU core that the laptop has inside it.

I'm willing to restore the page to your userspace for you; it'll be at User:Harlander211/Inside — but what you need to do to make it keepable is to add some references to actual media coverage that the film has gotten. And just so you know, according to our naming conventions on here, when the page is ready to be moved back into articlespace its title should be either Inside (2011 film) or Inside (social media film); the page's title isn't really the place to announce whether it's the first of its kind or not (that's what the article and the references are for.)

Hope that helps a bit. Bearcat (talk) 00:47, 22 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks Bearcat! This helps a lot. I'll get those references posted tonight. Harlander211 (talk) 01:05, 22 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Bearcat. I've added references to the page and also changed the title to Inside (Social Film). Can you please help restore the page? Thanks so much for your help! Harlander211 (talk) 16:37, 22 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Done. Just so you know, I also made a number of minor formatting changes to conform a little bit more with Wikipedia conventions; for example, I switched the Toshiba Satellite and Intel Core links so that they point to our articles on the topics instead of their pages on the Toshiba and Intel websites; both of those articles already contain the appropriate offsite links anyway. The final thing to be aware of is that our best practices when it comes to references is to nest them in the body text itself with <ref> tags instead of simply listing them — but listing them is obviously still better than nothing at all. Glad we could get this all sorted out. Bearcat (talk) 21:47, 22 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

August 2012[edit]

Hello, Harlander211. We welcome your contributions to Wikipedia, but if you are affiliated with some of the people, places or things you have written about in the article The Beauty Inside, you may have a conflict of interest or close connection to the subject.

All editors are required to comply with Wikipedia's neutral point of view content policy. People who are very close to a subject often have a distorted view of it, which may cause them to inadvertently edit in ways that make the article either too flattering or too disparaging. People with a close connection to a subject are not absolutely prohibited from editing about that subject, but they need to be especially careful about ensuring their edits are verified by reliable sources and writing with as little bias as possible.

If you are very close to a subject, here are some ways you can reduce the risk of problems:

Avoid or exercise great caution when editing or creating articles related to you, your organization, or its competitors, as well as projects and products they are involved with.
Be cautious about deletion discussions. Everyone is welcome to provide information about independent sources in deletion discussions, but avoid advocating for deletion of articles about your competitors.
Avoid linking to the Wikipedia article or website of your organization in other articles (see Wikipedia:Spam).
Exercise great caution so that you do not accidentally breach Wikipedia's content policies.

Please familiarize yourself with relevant content policies and guidelines, especially those pertaining to neutral point of view, verifiability of information, and autobiographies.

For information on how to contribute to Wikipedia when you have a conflict of interest, please see our frequently asked questions for organizations. Thank you. BOVINEBOY2008 13:53, 21 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Possibly unfree File:IntelandToshiba.jpg[edit]

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:IntelandToshiba.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the file description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you object to the listing for any reason. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 08:44, 14 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]