User talk:Hannahtsl

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Welcome![edit]

Hello and welcome to Wikipedia. Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. The following links will help you begin editing on Wikipedia:

Please bear these points in mind while editing Wikipedia:

The Wikipedia tutorial is a good place to start learning about Wikipedia. If you have any questions, see the help pages, add a question to the village pump or ask me on my talk page. By the way, you can sign your name on Talk and discussion pages using four tildes, like this: ~~~~ (the software will replace them with your signature and the date). Again, welcome!

TS Lombard[edit]

Re the article created at TS Lombard. It seems that the page was moved to mainspace without completing the review process. This is not always a good idea and the page is still subject to review. Please note that Wikipedia cannot be use as a reference (see WP:UGC) and references need to be properly formatted (not just 'bare' URLs); see WP:REFB for aguide to how to do this.

More importantly, if you have any connection with the subject, you must read both WP:COI and WP:PAID and make the necessary declarations. The latter page is mandatory under the terms of use. Whatever the situation, please respond to this message clarifying the situation with regard to your connection. Thank you. Eagleash (talk) 13:10, 24 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Managing a conflict of interest[edit]

Information icon Hello, Hannahtsl. We welcome your contributions, but if you have an external relationship with the people, places or things you have written about in the page User:Hannahtsl/sandbox, you may have a conflict of interest (COI). Editors with a conflict of interest may be unduly influenced by their connection to the topic. See the conflict of interest guideline and FAQ for organizations for more information. We ask that you:

  • avoid editing or creating articles about yourself, your family, friends, colleagues, company, organization or competitors;
  • propose changes on the talk pages of affected articles (you can use the {{request edit}} template);
  • disclose your conflict of interest when discussing affected articles (see Wikipedia:Conflict of interest#How to disclose a COI);
  • avoid linking to your organization's website in other articles (see WP:Spam);
  • do your best to comply with Wikipedia's content policies.

In addition, you are required by the Wikimedia Foundation's terms of use to disclose your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution which forms all or part of work for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation. See Wikipedia:Paid-contribution disclosure.

Also, editing for the purpose of advertising, publicising, or promoting anyone or anything is not permitted. Thank you. GPL93 (talk) 12:27, 28 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: sandbox (January 28)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Eagleash was:
This appears to be a duplicate of another submission, TS Lombard, which is also waiting to be reviewed. To save time we will consider the other submission and not this one.
 The comment the reviewer left was:
This appears to be a duplicate of an existing submission. Please do not create dupliacte submissions to avoid confusion and use of other editors' time. Also unanswered questions at the creator's talk page re connection or 'paid' editing.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
Eagleash (talk) 12:27, 28 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Teahouse logo
Hello, Hannahtsl! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Eagleash (talk) 12:27, 28 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

February 2020[edit]

Information icon Re Draft:TS Lombard, please do not add references as bare URLs as this leaves them subject to link rot. Please format references correctly per WP:REFB as requested above. Further, once again, please read WP:COI and WP:PAID and make the necessary declarations. The latter page is mandatory under the terms of use and it may cause difficulties if you do not comply with this. Again, please respond to these messages clarifying the situation as also requested above. Thank you. Eagleash (talk) 15:24, 18 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: TS Lombard (April 20)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Sulfurboy were:
This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of organizations and companies). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.
This submission appears to read more like an advertisement than an entry in an encyclopedia. Encyclopedia articles need to be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources, not just to materials produced by the creator of the subject being discussed. This is important so that the article can meet Wikipedia's verifiability policy and the notability of the subject can be established. If you still feel that this subject is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia, please rewrite your submission to comply with these policies.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
Sulfurboy (talk) 16:41, 20 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: sandbox (July 24)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Eagleash was:
This appears to be a duplicate of another submission, TS Lombard, which is also waiting to be reviewed. To save time we will consider the other submission and not this one.
 The comment the reviewer left was:
Please do not create duplicate submissions as it causes confusion and takes up the time of other volunteers. There is little if any, point, in re-submitting a rejected draft without addressing issues. Also the question of conflict of interest or paid editing does not seem to have been answered.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
Eagleash (talk) 10:05, 24 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Charles Dumas (economist) for deletion[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Charles Dumas (economist) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Charles Dumas (economist) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Bearcat (talk) 16:45, 26 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

July 2020[edit]

Information icon

Hello Hannahtsl. The nature of your edits gives the impression you have an undisclosed financial stake in promoting a topic, but you have not complied with Wikipedia's mandatory paid editing disclosure requirements. Paid advocacy is a category of conflict of interest (COI) editing that involves being compensated by a person, group, company or organization to use Wikipedia to promote their interests. Undisclosed paid advocacy is prohibited by our policies on neutral point of view and what Wikipedia is not, and is an especially serious type of COI; the Wikimedia Foundation regards it as a "black hat" practice akin to black-hat SEO.

Paid advocates are very strongly discouraged from direct article editing, and should instead propose changes on the talk page of the article in question if an article exists. If the article does not exist, paid advocates are extremely strongly discouraged from attempting to write an article at all. At best, any proposed article creation should be submitted through the articles for creation process, rather than directly.

Regardless, if you are receiving or expect to receive compensation for your edits, broadly construed, you are required by the Wikimedia Terms of Use to disclose your employer, client and affiliation. You can post such a mandatory disclosure to your user page at User:Hannahtsl. The template {{Paid}} can be used for this purpose – e.g. in the form: {{paid|user=Hannahtsl|employer=InsertName|client=InsertName}}. If I am mistaken – you are not being directly or indirectly compensated for your edits – please state that in response to this message. Otherwise, please provide the required disclosure. In either case, do not edit further until you answer this message. Being employed by T S Lombard is most assuredly paid editing when you write articles and drafts about them and their staff Fiddle Faddle 22:23, 27 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, thanks for informing me. I am employed by TSLombard, but creating the Wikipedia page is not part of my job. I would assume that this is a COI rather than a direct payment for my work? Please correct me if I am wrong, this is just so I can correctly declare my relationship to the topic.

The definition is very broadly construed. I would intrepret this as receiving a salary from the organisation you write about and thus you fall into the definition of a paid edotor for this and each and every employee who you wrote about. You have not attemted to conceal your relationshio with the company becase of the 'tsl' suffix on your user id, but that also indicates that you are editing here as an employee of the organisation. To avoid the chance of a block I suggest most strongly that you comply with the definition of being a paid editor and declare with precision that status for each article or draft you create about a fellow employee or associate.
An uncharitable person could consider that the creation of a wikipedia article on the org or its team might create an environment for career advancement. Fiddle Faddle 16:59, 28 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Ahh, I can see how it can be interpreted either way. Yes, I definitely did not try and disguise my affiliation. But have added the paid declaration to my talk page to be safe. Thank you for your help.

MfD nomination of Draft:TS Lombard[edit]

Draft:TS Lombard, a page which you created or substantially contributed to, has been nominated for deletion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; you may participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Draft:TS Lombard and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~). You are free to edit the content of Draft:TS Lombard during the discussion but should not remove the miscellany for deletion template from the top of the page; such a removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you. Fiddle Faddle 22:58, 27 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: TS Lombard (July 28)[edit]

Your recent article submission has been rejected. If you have further questions, you can ask at the Articles for creation help desk or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help. The reason left by Timtrent was: This topic is not sufficiently notable for inclusion in Wikipedia. The comment the reviewer left was: Every reference I have checked, and I have checked most of them, is a quote form an employee of T S Lombard, and is their product. That it is published in MSM is nether here nor there. There is nothing about TSL, in terms of significant coverage whether these organs are WP:RS or not.
Fiddle Faddle 06:54, 28 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, User:Hannahtsl/sandbox[edit]

Hello, Hannahtsl. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "sandbox".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz Read! Talk! 22:30, 27 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: TS Lombard (May 4)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Theroadislong was:
This submission does not appear to be written in the formal tone expected of an encyclopedia article. Entries should be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources. Please rewrite your submission in a more encyclopedic format. Please make sure to avoid peacock terms that promote the subject.
 The comment the reviewer left was:
"leading entrepreneur", "leading political analyst", " well-known economists", "preeminent economic research firms ", " leading economist" none of this is required.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
Theroadislong (talk) 10:30, 4 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:TS Lombard[edit]

Hello, Hannahtsl. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "TS Lombard".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. ✗plicit 11:27, 7 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Hannahtsl&oldid=1053991654"