User talk:HGB

History Question[edit]

Hi, you welcomed me when I joined WP, so I thought you'd be good to answer a question I had. How can one view the history of a delete article? I'm interested in what was on the page goat on a pole before it was deleted (curiosity, really) but I can't seem to find any evidence that it existed except in the deletion logs and history on a page that linked to it. Thanks in advance! Jesuschex 04:31, 11 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Vandalism[edit]

Some Vandal erased your comment in the Dog Behaviourist discussion. It's probably the same person who's been screwing with all the Cesar Millan related/referenced article. I'd report him if I knew how... It may also be good to place the lock on the article; to prevent those without a Username from editing. I'd be happy to get a username myself. The vandalism appears to be coming from the same person; but different IPs; maybe someone who has access to multiple IPs.

Animal rights/wrongs[edit]

It is not unsourced. The source is there - the links keep getting broken because of the continual reverts. And it is not off-topic. The contribution I've made that your budddy entreated you to delete is exactly on point. It says, as a criticism of the movement, that animals don't have any rights at all. It says that we have responsibilities. But it critices the movement by saying: animals don't have rights. I ask yyou, if not this, what else could be considered a criticism of any movement if it's whole reason detre is questioned? . This is widespead and legitimate view point and should be included.DocEss 20:11, 31 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Bad Nenndorf[edit]

Could you please not revet while discusions are happening? It would have been much more effective to make a comment on the talk page, as an obvious edit war was just concluded. pschemp | talk 21:08, 31 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Hi - in several minutes I will give up a statement concerning the whole issue on the German site (in English and German). Kind regards.--KarlV 10:55, 2 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

HGB, You asked for a translation of the German Bad Nenndorf talk; you can find it here. Regards, Samsara (talk • contribs) 18:59, 11 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you, that's helpful. HGB 23:44, 11 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Vandalism by 69.27.252.245[edit]

Hey, I saw your recent vandalism report for 69.27.252.245 and you said that he/she looked like a "bored kid in class". Could Mariska Hargitay have been the problem? Is he/she turning emo? (sorry, that's my little joke.) If so and you've caught him/her before, did their edits contain racial attacks? Just curious... --D.F. "Jun Kazama Master" Williams 16:56, 19 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Say Cheese[edit]

Teddey has smiled at you! Smiles promote WikiLove and hopefully this one has made your day better. Spread the WikiLove by smiling to someone else, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past or a good friend. Happy editing!
Smile at others by adding {{subst:Smile}} to their talk page with a friendly message.

Teddey 05:47, 1 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

A study on how to cover scientific uncertainties/controversies[edit]

Hi. I have emailed you to ask whether you would agree to participate in a short survey on how to cover scientific uncertainties/controversies in articles pertaining to global warming and climate change (survey described here). If interested, please email me Encyclopaedia21 (talk) 17:04, 5 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open![edit]

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 12:55, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

RC Patrol-related Proposals in the 2016 Community Wishlist Survey[edit]

Greetings Recent Changes Patrollers!

This is a one-time-only message to inform you about technical proposals related to Recent Changes Patrol in the 2016 Community Wishlist Survey that I think you may be interested in reviewing and perhaps even voting for:

Further, there are more than 20 proposals related to Watchlists in general that you may be interested in reviewing. (and over 260 proposals in all, across many aspects of wikis)

Thank you for your consideration. Please note that voting for proposals continues through December 12, 2016.

Note: You received this message because you have transcluded {{User wikipedia/RC Patrol}} (user box) on your user page. Since this message is "one-time-only" there is no opt out for future mailings.

Best regards, Stevietheman — Delivered: 01:10, 8 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]