User talk:Gx872op

Welcome[edit]

Welcome!

Hello, Gx872op, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on discussion pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{helpme}} before the question. Again, welcome! Aboutmovies (talk) 21:58, 26 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Suspect class[edit]

To modify the Perry_v._Schwarzenegger as you suggest, we need a 3rd-party source. Bmclaughlin9 (talk) 19:11, 20 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Your reference desk contribution[edit]

Hi Gx872op! I just wanted to take a moment to convey my strong appreciation for your lights concerning the question I posted to the reference desk about the nature of the findings of an investigation conducted by a U.S. Inspector General.

I expressed my thanks - and a follow-on question - there, but since your effort seemed extraordinary to me, a more personal thanks seemed in order, as well. I was especially impressed that you took the trouble to cite case law and to provide a concise definition of "adjudication", and even the exact langage and supporting refs from 5 U.S.C. § 551(7) and § 551(6).

That was generous, and very helpful. I know little of the law, but I do appreciate the value of exact definitions, since they're so necessary in mathematical philosophy, which I greatly enjoy. Thanks very much for providing those; we would have been all to seek without them, and without your clear, careful explanations more generally. With gratitude, – OhioStandard (talk) 09:57, 16 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

How hard would it have been to preserve both[edit]

Here? Savidan 03:33, 6 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

CopyVio[edit]

The only other two done in this way are Moo Duk Kwan and Hwang Kee. Usually I just flag and see it deleted by admin or cut out the offending section. Please check and I am sorry I missed the commons tag but at the bottom of the page there was a copyright statement which is what i focused on. Archiving is not a bad thing.Peter Rehse (talk) 16:24, 25 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]