User talk:Green Storm 7

Green Storm 7, you are invited to the Teahouse![edit]

Hi Green Storm 7! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia.
Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from experienced editors like Cordless Larry (talk).

Visit the Teahouse

We hope to see you there!

Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts

16:03, 11 February 2017 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Glidden Doman has been accepted[edit]

Glidden Doman, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

SwisterTwister talk 19:17, 12 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia and copyright[edit]

Hello Green Storm 7, and welcome to Wikipedia. All or some of your addition(s) to Anton Flettner have been removed, as it appears to have added copyrighted material without evidence of permission from the copyright holder. While we appreciate your contributing to Wikipedia, there are certain things you must keep in mind about using information from your sources to avoid copyright or plagiarism issues here.

You can only copy/translate a small amount of a source, and you must mark what you take as a direct quotation with double quotation marks (") and cite the source using an inline citation. You can read about this at Wikipedia:Non-free content in the sections on "text". See also Help:Referencing for beginners, for how to cite sources here.
Aside from limited quotation, you must put all information in your own words and structure, in proper paraphrase. Following the source's words too closely can create copyright problems, so it is not permitted here; see Wikipedia:Close paraphrasing. (There is a college-level introduction to paraphrase, with examples, hosted by the Online Writing Lab of Purdue.) Even when using your own words, you are still, however, asked to cite your sources to verify information and to demonstrate that the content is not original research.
Our primary policy on using copyrighted content is Wikipedia:Copyrights. You may also want to review Wikipedia:Copy-paste.
If you own the copyright to the source you want to copy or are a designated agent, you may be able to license that text so that we can publish it here. However, there are steps that must be taken to verify that license before you do. See Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials.
In very rare cases (that is, for sources that are public domain or compatibly licensed), it may be possible to include greater portions of a source text. However, please seek help at the help desk before adding such content to the article. 99.9% of sources may not be added in this way, so it is necessary to seek confirmation first. If you do confirm that a source is public domain or compatibly licensed, you will still need to provide full attribution; see Wikipedia:Plagiarism for the steps you need to follow.
Also note that Wikipedia articles may not be copied or translated without attribution. If you want to copy or translate from another Wikipedia project or article, you can, but please follow the steps in Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia.

It's very important that contributors understand and follow these practices, as policy requires that people who persistently do not must be blocked from editing. If you have any questions about this, you are welcome to leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. — Diannaa 🍁 (talk) 22:29, 24 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Green Storm. It seems you have made some good contributions to Wikipedia, and I would like that to continue. However, it also seems that you don't understand the Copyright concepts. Copyright is taken very seriously on Wikipedia, and you risk getting blocked if you continue to use content (text or images) that is not free from copyright. You can't contribute if you get blocked. So please use good content, and continue with good contributions. Thanks. TGCP (talk) 17:39, 13 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for contributing to the article Anton Flettner ‎. However, one of Wikipedia's core policies is that material must be verifiable and attributed to reliable sources. You have recently used citations which copied, or mirrored, material from Wikipedia. This leads to a circular reference and is not acceptable. Most mirrors are clearly labeled as such, but some are in violation of our license and do not provide the correct attribution. Please help by adding alternate sources to the article you edited! If you need any help or clarification, you can look at Help:Contents/Editing Wikipedia or ask at Wikipedia:New contributors' help page, or just ask me. Thank you. Kuru (talk) 14:55, 26 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Flettner[edit]

Please use the talkpage to discuss proposed edits - many of your contributions have been copied in from external sources and Wikipedia mirrors. We want to update the sourcing, but not by copy/paste. Simply reverting Kuru isn't acceptable. Acroterion (talk) 17:56, 26 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Acroterion, thank you for your message. I am new to Wikipedia and am making a sincere effort to work with Wikipedia's parameters. Per Kudu's e-mail, please note that I did make considerable changes to the sources cited (i.e. to each source that I believe mirrored other Wikipedia pages), before I saved Anton Flettner's page to a suggested new version. I would be very grateful for any of your suggestions on specific changes that I can make to make the new page version acceptable. Thank You!

A few observations on this big edit [1]:

Can we find a source that isn't Britannica? Like WP it's a tertiary source, and secondary sources such as books are preferred.
The duchmann.net page isn't usually the kind of page we'd cite - it's perhaps fine for confirming other sources, but a personal genealogy page isn't normally accepted as a reliable source.
Internet fora are never acceptable: forum.largescaleplanes.com can't be used. They might give you confirmation of other material or point you in the right direction, but we never cite them.
Personal letters aren't usable unless they've already been cited in published works, in which case the work should be cited, not the letter. This applies to the Hohenemser cite.
Wikiwand is a Wikipedia mirror and can't be used: Wikipedia itself can't be cited, nor can a mirror.
I haven't checked the text, but Kuru was concerned about text that closely resembled the sources. Acroterion (talk) 21:52, 26 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Thank You, Acroterion. Your remarks have been quite helpful in providing insight on requirements and preferences for WP.

I believe that I have now made all of the required changes to the references listed on Anton Flettner's WP. From my further research, the information contained within the dutchmann.net page referring to Anton Flettner is credible.

Last warning, please stop using "wikiwand" for sourcing. At this point, you seem to be doing it intentionally.Kuru (talk) 16:27, 28 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Kudu, please explain the issue with my sourcing. I honestly do not know how to use Wikiwand for sourcing so I can assure you there is nothing intentional. Thank You!

With this addition, you again re-added a link to the wikiwand. Click on that link and tell me which addresses you see in the text. Kuru (talk) 17:15, 28 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, I now see your point. I am dumbfounded as to how that happened. Anyway, I do have proper sources for that sentence. How can I edit the file now? I seemed to now locked out from adding a reference with the 'citation needed' listed at the end of this sentence.

Kuru, can you please help with a question? I have added new references as a response to the prior 'citation needed'. The Wikipedia page pulls up properly but the Wikiwand page still shows 'citation needed'!? Is there something that I can do to fix the Wikiwand page? Thank you in advance for your help!

ArbCom 2017 election voter message[edit]

Hello, Green Storm 7. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for October 22[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Variable speed wind turbine, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page MW. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 06:25, 22 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message[edit]

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:53, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message[edit]

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:48, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for November 23[edit]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Seawind Ocean Technology, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Yaw.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 05:58, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message[edit]

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:33, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]