User talk:Goldsztajn/Archives/2023/January
 | This page is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Happy New Year, Goldsztajn!
Goldsztajn,
Have a prosperous, productive and enjoyable New Year, and thanks for your contributions to Wikipedia.
Abishe (talk) 03:13, 1 January 2023 (UTC)
Send New Year cheer by adding {{subst:Happy New Year fireworks}} to user talk pages.
Abishe (talk) 03:13, 1 January 2023 (UTC)
The Signpost: 1 January 2023
- Interview: ComplexRational's RfA debrief
- Technology report: Wikimedia Foundation's Abstract Wikipedia project "at substantial risk of failure"
- Essay: Mobile editing
- Arbitration report: Arbitration Committee Election 2022
- Recent research: Graham's Hierarchy of Disagreement in talk page disputes
- Featured content: Would you like to swing on a star?
- Traffic report: Football, football, football! Wikipedia Football Club!
- CommonsComix: #4: The Course of WikiEmpire
- From the archives: Five, ten, and fifteen years ago
RE: "Fails" NPOL
Thank you for making the distinction here. I sometimes fall into the same trap of writing "Fails NPOL" rather than "Doesn't pass NPOL"; it is a small, but important distinction. Curbon7 (talk) 21:52, 1 January 2023 (UTC)
New Pages Patrol newsletter January 2023
Hello Goldsztajn/Archives/2023,
- Backlog
The October drive reduced the backlog from 9,700 to an amazing 0! Congratulations to WaddlesJP13 who led with 2084 points. See this page for further details. The queue is steadily rising again and is approaching 2,000. It would be great if <2,000 were the “new normal”. Please continue to help out even if it's only for a few or even one patrol a day.
- 2022 Awards
Onel5969 won the 2022 cup for 28,302 article reviews last year - that's an average of nearly 80/day. There was one Gold Award (5000+ reviews), 11 Silver (2000+), 28 Iron (360+) and 39 more for the 100+ barnstar. Rosguill led again for the 4th year by clearing 49,294 redirects. For the full details see the Awards page and the Hall of Fame. Congratulations everyone!
Minimum deletion time: The previous WP:NPP guideline was to wait 15 minutes before tagging for deletion (including draftification and WP:BLAR). Due to complaints, a consensus decided to raise the time to 1 hour. To illustrate this, very new pages in the feed are now highlighted in red. (As always, this is not applicable to attack pages, copyvios, vandalism, etc.)
New draftify script: In response to feedback from AFC, the The Move to Draft script now provides a choice of set messages that also link the creator to a new, friendly explanation page. The script also warns reviewers if the creator is probably still developing the article. The former script is no longer maintained. Please edit your edit your common.js or vector.js file from User:Evad37/MoveToDraft.js to User:MPGuy2824/MoveToDraft.js
Redirects: Some of our redirect reviewers have reduced their activity and the backlog is up to 9,000+ (two months deep). If you are interested in this distinctly different task and need any help, see this guide, this checklist, and spend some time at WP:RFD.
Discussions with the WMF The PageTriage open letter signed by 444 users is bearing fruit. The Growth Team has assigned some software engineers to work on PageTriage, the software that powers the NewPagesFeed and the Page Curation toolbar. WMF has submitted dozens of patches in the last few weeks to modernize PageTriage's code, which will make it easier to write patches in the future. This work is helpful but is not very visible to the end user. For patches visible to the end user, volunteers such as Novem Linguae and MPGuy2824 have been writing patches for bug reports and feature requests. The Growth Team also had a video conference with the NPP coordinators to discuss revamping the landing pages that new users see.
- Reminders
- Newsletter feedback - please take this short poll about the newsletter.
- There is live chat with patrollers on the New Page Patrol Discord.
- Please add the project discussion page to your watchlist.
- If you no longer wish to be a reviewer, please ask any admin to remove you from the group. If you want the tools back again, just ask at PERM.
- To opt out of future mailings, please remove yourself here.
Peer Review Request
Hi -- I'm seeking peer review for the page Welfare Colonialism and based on your interest in "20th Century politics, economics, development studies, labour, gender" and the peer review instructions am reaching out to see if you'd be able to take a look and share your thoughts. My notes on the review page are: "Hello, I am requesting peer review of this page. I am somewhat new to the peer review process; my aim is simply to further develop this page. To that end I appeal to those more experienced than I to advise me." Cheers and much thanks Iguana0000 (talk) 14:06, 7 January 2023 (UTC)
- Hi @Iguana0000 - nice to meet you and happy to have a look. I'll leave some comments on the review page. Kind regards, Goldsztajn (talk) 20:59, 7 January 2023 (UTC)
- Thank you! Iguana0000 (talk) 22:51, 7 January 2023 (UTC)
- Quick Q (and much much much thanks). What do you think of either the first or last photo in this article to illustrate the welfare colonialism page? I believe I could secure permission for either; the first was taken by a now-deceased member of an activist family whom I imagine might allow its use and the last is a public monument. Iguana0000 (talk) 16:48, 8 January 2023 (UTC)
- Hi @Iguana0000 - glad the comments proved helpful! In terms of the photos...this is hard. I'm not sure these images unambiguously depict welfare colonialism: yes, Indigenous people are depicted, yes, they are related to welfare policies of the governemnt ... but is this an image illustrating welfare colonialism? My point is just because two aspects of a subject are illustrated, it does not make that a depiction of the subject. Again, it appears to me a type of synthesis. You really need a source that refers to this particular process as part of welfare colonialism (and even then one would need to qualify this ... so and so has called etc, rather than just using wikipedia's voice). On the other hand, an image which depicted, for example, an Indigenous writer who has criticised welfare colonialism might be more appropriate or an image of Paine. Or possibly protests against welfare policies ... again this one is also hard ... my precusory understanding of Paine's use of welfare colonialism is that he is pointing to a period after assimiliation policies (so he would not (?) classify child removal policy within the rubric of welfare colonialism). However, a picture of the hospitals built by the Belgians in the Congo could be used since that is explicitly discussed in the source I cited in the peer review as a form of welfare colonialism. Regards, Goldsztajn (talk) 03:39, 9 January 2023 (UTC)
- Many good points. Re the Canadian gov't response to the tuberculosis epidemic and its relation to welfare colonialism, I was thinking back to this book -- https://www.ucpress.edu/book/9780520282940/life-beside-itself -- where the author traces the similarities in the government response to both the tuberculosis and more recent youth suicide "epidemics". I'm not sure whether she uses the term 'welfare colonialism' per se but certainly the gist is there (and I can ask her). She documents how the government's response in both cases was enormously disruptive, inefficient, heedlessly disrespectful to the people it was trying to save, ignored the suggestions of the local community and had long-term negative effects. In particular it involved removal of those deemed ill, who were transported hundreds of miles to facilities where they could not communicate with anyone. If someone died their families were not notified. To the Inuit it paralleled infamous removal strategies such as residential schools, the Sixties_Scoop (which themselves were imagined to be benign, even beneficent gestures, by those who dreamed them up). Inuit suggestions of how to address these problems in a less destructive way were of course ignored because ... what do they know. Iguana0000 (talk) 20:51, 9 January 2023 (UTC)
- Just checked and she does quote Robert Paine quite a bit, also mentions welfare colonialism. Iguana0000 (talk) 20:58, 9 January 2023 (UTC)
- @Iguana0000 better to continue this on the article talk page. Regards, Goldsztajn (talk) 07:45, 10 January 2023 (UTC)
- Just checked and she does quote Robert Paine quite a bit, also mentions welfare colonialism. Iguana0000 (talk) 20:58, 9 January 2023 (UTC)
- Many good points. Re the Canadian gov't response to the tuberculosis epidemic and its relation to welfare colonialism, I was thinking back to this book -- https://www.ucpress.edu/book/9780520282940/life-beside-itself -- where the author traces the similarities in the government response to both the tuberculosis and more recent youth suicide "epidemics". I'm not sure whether she uses the term 'welfare colonialism' per se but certainly the gist is there (and I can ask her). She documents how the government's response in both cases was enormously disruptive, inefficient, heedlessly disrespectful to the people it was trying to save, ignored the suggestions of the local community and had long-term negative effects. In particular it involved removal of those deemed ill, who were transported hundreds of miles to facilities where they could not communicate with anyone. If someone died their families were not notified. To the Inuit it paralleled infamous removal strategies such as residential schools, the Sixties_Scoop (which themselves were imagined to be benign, even beneficent gestures, by those who dreamed them up). Inuit suggestions of how to address these problems in a less destructive way were of course ignored because ... what do they know. Iguana0000 (talk) 20:51, 9 January 2023 (UTC)
- Hi @Iguana0000 - glad the comments proved helpful! In terms of the photos...this is hard. I'm not sure these images unambiguously depict welfare colonialism: yes, Indigenous people are depicted, yes, they are related to welfare policies of the governemnt ... but is this an image illustrating welfare colonialism? My point is just because two aspects of a subject are illustrated, it does not make that a depiction of the subject. Again, it appears to me a type of synthesis. You really need a source that refers to this particular process as part of welfare colonialism (and even then one would need to qualify this ... so and so has called etc, rather than just using wikipedia's voice). On the other hand, an image which depicted, for example, an Indigenous writer who has criticised welfare colonialism might be more appropriate or an image of Paine. Or possibly protests against welfare policies ... again this one is also hard ... my precusory understanding of Paine's use of welfare colonialism is that he is pointing to a period after assimiliation policies (so he would not (?) classify child removal policy within the rubric of welfare colonialism). However, a picture of the hospitals built by the Belgians in the Congo could be used since that is explicitly discussed in the source I cited in the peer review as a form of welfare colonialism. Regards, Goldsztajn (talk) 03:39, 9 January 2023 (UTC)
Interview request
As one of the founding and presently active members of WP:LABOR I would be delighted if you answered some questions in Wikipedia:Wikipedia Signpost/Next issue/WikiProject report on WP:LABOR. Feel free to directly edit/add any questions as you see fit. ~ 🦝 Shushugah (he/him • talk) 17:58, 11 January 2023 (UTC)
A barnstar for you!
|
The Working Wikipedian's Barnstar |
| Thank you for participating in Articles for Creation's January 2023 Backlog Drive! You reviewed 59 drafts, for a total of 84.5 points. — Ingenuity (talk • contribs) 00:43, 15 January 2023 (UTC) |
The Signpost: 16 January 2023
- Special report: Coverage of 2022 bans reveals editors serving long sentences in Saudi Arabia since 2020
- News and notes: Revised Code of Conduct Enforcement Guidelines up for vote, WMF counsel departs, generative models under discussion
- In the media: Court orders user data in libel case, Saudi Wikipedia in the crosshairs, Larry Sanger at it again
- Technology report: View it! A new tool for image discovery
- In focus: Busting into Grand Central
- Serendipity: How I bought part of Wikipedia – for less than $100
- Featured content: Flip your lid
- Traffic report: The most viewed articles of 2022
- From the archives: Five, ten, and fifteen years ago
Question from P00PY P4NTS C4T (17:59, 20 January 2023)
Hello. I would like to create a page, but I do not know how to. Could you help me with my situation? Thanks. --P00PY P4NTS C4T (talk) 17:59, 20 January 2023 (UTC)
Thank you for considering your !vote further
While not seeking to influence your eventual opinion by leaving this message I have put a note of clarification under my own !vote. This may assist your deliberations. You are, of course at liberty to agree or disagree with me. 🇺🇦 FiddleTimtrent FaddleTalk to me 🇺🇦 09:25, 25 January 2023 (UTC)
Question from Mpreation on Daryl Cobb (15:36, 28 January 2023)
Mpreation is very beautiful name in the world all people is impressed the name Prakash and manju creations is full name very unique name and website owner name is Prakash Kumar sahoo Lucky --Mpreation (talk) 15:36, 28 January 2023 (UTC)