User talk:Goldsztajn/Archives/2019/December

Copyright problem: Ted Roach (trade unionist)

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia! We welcome and appreciate your contributions, such as Ted Roach (trade unionist), but we regretfully cannot accept copyrighted text or images from either web sites or printed works. This article appears to contain work copied from http://archives-dev.anu.edu.au/index.php/roach-edward-charles, and therefore to constitute a violation of Wikipedia's copyright policies. The copyrighted text has been or will soon be deleted. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with our copyright policy. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators are liable to be blocked from editing.

If you believe that the article is not a copyright violation, or if you have permission from the copyright holder to release the content freely under license allowed by Wikipedia, then you should do one of the following:

• Have the author release the text under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 3.0 License (CC BY-SA 3.0) by leaving a message explaining the details at Talk:Ted Roach (trade unionist) and send an email with confirmation of permission to "permissions-en (at) wikimedia (dot) org". Make sure they quote the exact page name, Ted Roach (trade unionist), in their email. See Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for instructions.
• If you hold the copyright to the work: send an e-mail from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en(at)wikimedia(dot)org or a postal message to the Wikimedia Foundation permitting re-use under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 3.0 License and GNU Free Documentation License, and note that you have done so on Talk:Ted Roach (trade unionist). See Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for instructions.
• If a note on the original website states that re-use is permitted "under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License (CC-BY-SA), version 3.0", or that the work is released into the public domain, or if you have strong reason to believe it is, leave a note at Talk:Ted Roach (trade unionist) with a link to where we can find that note or your explanation of why you believe the content is free for reuse.

It may also be necessary for the text to be modified to have an encyclopedic tone and to follow Wikipedia article layout. For more information on Wikipedia's policies, see Wikipedia's policies and guidelines.

See Wikipedia:Declaration of consent for all enquiries for a template of the permissions letter the copyright holder is expected to send.

If you would like to begin working on a new version of the article you may do so at this temporary page. Leave a note at Talk:Ted Roach (trade unionist) saying you have done so and an administrator will move the new article into place once the issue is resolved.

Thank you, and please feel welcome to continue contributing to Wikipedia. Happy editing! — Diannaa 🍁 (talk) 20:55, 9 December 2019 (UTC)

@Diannaa: apologies, that was an article sitting in my sandbox for a couple of weeks which I had not worked on for some time and I made the error of forgetting I had not reworked the parts I was using for referencing. I have produced new text; the text from the ANU site can be deleted and the warning removed. --Goldsztajn (talk) 18:00, 10 December 2019 (UTC)

The article is not yet ready; please refer to the copyvio detector to view the overlapping portions. Also, can you provide a link to the sandbox copy for me? I can't find it. Thanks, — Diannaa 🍁 (talk) 20:03, 10 December 2019 (UTC)

@Diannaa: Hi - apart from place names, as far as I can see the copyvio detector is flagging the material that you had already tagged which has been left untouched as per the instructions of the tag. That is the material I was suggesting could now be deleted. The draft in the sandbox was here, but I tagged it for speedy delete upon creation. Goldsztajn (talk) 21:13, 10 December 2019 (UTC)

The instructions said to put your re-write here. Your draft was deleted eight minutes after you tagged it for deletion (i.e. about 4 hours ago). I will restore your draft and check it over and get back to you. — Diannaa 🍁 (talk) 21:19, 10 December 2019 (UTC)

The copyvio report for the draft shows a 68.8% overlap. So it needs more work. Please ping me when you think it's ready. — Diannaa 🍁 (talk) 21:27, 10 December 2019 (UTC)

@Diannaa: I don't understand why you indicate the deletion was four hours ago....The page was deleted more than 48 hours ago. The new text in the article is now also in the temp area as requested. --Goldsztajn (talk) 23:16, 10 December 2019 (UTC)

All finished, thanks for your patience. In the future, please don't add copyright material to Wikipedia, not even in sandboxes or drafts. The same copyright rules apply on all pages. — Diannaa 🍁 (talk) 00:22, 11 December 2019 (UTC)

@Diannaa: Thanks for the prod to clean up the article; I've removed the text now repeated twice following your (semi-auto?) edits. Kind regards --Goldsztajn (talk) 00:28, 11 December 2019 (UTC)

okay, I didn't realize that you'd inserted the new prose into articlespace since the instructions say the new version is supposed to be on the temp page, not in the article. Sorry about that. — Diannaa 🍁 (talk) 00:50, 11 December 2019 (UTC)

DYK nomination of John Belchem

Hello! Your submission of John Belchem at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! Yoninah (talk) 22:53, 27 November 2019 (UTC)

Please see new note on your DYK nomination. Yoninah (talk) 23:59, 19 December 2019 (UTC)

DYK for Longshoremen v. Allied Int'l, Inc.

On 27 December 2019, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Longshoremen v. Allied Int'l, Inc., which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that in 1982, the U.S. Supreme Court ruled that the refusal of the International Longshoremen's Association to unload cargo from the Soviet Union was illegal under the National Labor Relations Act? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Longshoremen v. Allied Int'l, Inc.. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, Longshoremen v. Allied Int'l, Inc.), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

--valereee (talk) 12:02, 27 December 2019 (UTC)