User talk:Gobautista

Welcome![edit]

Hello, Gobautista, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created, such as Online Crib, may not conform to some of Wikipedia's guidelines, and may not be retained.

There's a page about creating articles you may want to read called Your first article. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the New contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{helpme}} on this page, followed by your question, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Wikipedia:Questions or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! - Mr X 13:50, 13 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Gobautista, you are invited to the Teahouse[edit]

Hi Gobautista! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia.
Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from peers and experienced editors. I hope to see you there! Benzband (I'm a Teahouse host)

Visit the Teahouse

This message was delivered automatically by your robot friend, HostBot (talk) 01:15, 14 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Notes[edit]

Disambiguation link notification for November 5[edit]

(UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for April 9[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Banlic, Cabuyao (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added links pointing to Lee, BPO, National Highway and Pure Gold

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:52, 9 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of User:Gobautista[edit]

A tag has been placed on User:Gobautista requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section U5 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to consist of writings, information, discussions, and/or activities not closely related to Wikipedia's goals. Please note that Wikipedia is not a free Web hosting service. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such pages may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Juggler2005 (talk) 07:50, 20 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Contested deletion[edit]

This page should not be speedily deleted because... (Why delete this page, in the first place this is my profile account, and i don't think I'm using Wikipedia for nothing or for personal gain. Kindly check first my contributions. Thanks ) --Gobautista (talk) 08:09, 20 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

With somewhat less than 300 edits to the encyclopedia, the material in your userpage is definitely excessive and it seemed to be promoting yourself and your business. §FreeRangeFrog^croak 00:07, 5 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

User page[edit]

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. The thread is Restorations of deleted pages. Thank you. —Juggler2005 (talk) 11:12, 5 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of User:Gobautista[edit]

A tag has been placed on User:Gobautista, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done for the following reason:

It may meet Wikipedia's criteria for speedy deletion under CSD u5

Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not meet basic Wikipedia criteria may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Helpsome (talk) 11:38, 5 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of User:Gobautista[edit]

A tag has been placed on User:Gobautista requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section U5 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to consist of writings, information, discussions, and/or activities not closely related to Wikipedia's goals. Please note that Wikipedia is not a free Web hosting service. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such pages may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Juggler2005 (talk) 04:25, 10 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

September 2014[edit]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to add soapboxing, promotional or advertising material to Wikipedia, you may be blocked from editing. Peridon (talk) 09:46, 10 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for February 19[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Catanduanes, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Phantom. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:55, 19 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Catandungan Festival[edit]

This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of Catandungan Festival, and it appears to include material copied directly from http://tagaloglang.com/The-Philippines/Festivals/catandungan-festival.html.

It is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article. The article will be reviewed to determine if there are any copyright issues.

If substantial content is duplicated and it is not public domain or available under a compatible license, it will be deleted. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material. You may use such publications as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. See our copyright policy for further details. (If you own the copyright to the previously published content and wish to donate it, see Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for the procedure.) CorenSearchBot (talk) 03:35, 21 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for September 22[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Abaca Festival, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Abac. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:46, 22 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open![edit]

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:59, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Signpost exit poll[edit]

Dear Wikipedian, you recently voted in the ArbCom election. Your username, along with around 155 other usernames of your fellow Wikipedians, was randomly selected from the 2000+ Wikipedians who voted this year, with the help of one of the election-commissioners. If you are willing, could you please participate (at your option either on-wiki via userspace or off-wiki via email) in an exit poll, and answer some questions about how you decided amongst the ArbCom candidates?

If you decide to participate in this exit poll, the statistical results will be published in the Signpost, an online newspaper with over 1000 Wikipedians among the readership. There are about twelve questions, which have alphanumerical answers; it should take you a few minutes to complete the exit poll questionnaire, and will help improve Wikipedia by giving future candidates information about what you think is important. This is only an unofficial survey, and will have no impact on your actual vote during this election, nor in any future election.

All questions are individually optional, and this entire exit poll itself is also entirely optional, though if you choose not to participate, I would appreciate a brief reply indicating why you decided not to take part (see Question Zero). Thanks for being a Wikipedian

The questionnaire[edit]

Dear Wikipedian, please fill out these questions -- at your option via usertalk or via email, see Detailed Instructions at the end of the twelve questions -- by putting the appropriate answer in the blanks provided. If you decide not to answer a question (all questions are optional), please put the reason down: "undecided" / "private information" / "prefer not to answer" / "question is not well-posed" / "other: please specify". Although the Signpost cannot guarantee that complex answers can be processed for publication, it will help us improve future exit polls, if you give us comments about why you could not answer specific questions.

quick and easy exit poll , estimated time required: 4 minutes

Q#0. Will you be responding to the questions in this exit poll? Why or why not?

Your Answer: Yes
Your Comments: Because it is our right

Q#1. Arbs must have at least 0k / 2k / 4k / 8k / 16k / 32k+ edits to Wikipedia.

Your Numeric Answer: 16k
Your Comments:

Q#2. Arbs must have at least 0 / 1 / 2 / 3 / 4 / 5 / 6 / 7+ years editing Wikipedia.

Your Numeric Answer: 7+
Your Comments:

Q#3. Arbs...

^A: should not be an admin

^B: should preferably not be an admin

^C: can be but need not be an admin

^D: should preferably be an admin

^E: must be or have been an admin

^F: must currently be an admin

Your Single-Letter Answer: D
Your Comments:

Q#4. Arbs must have at least 0 / 1 / 2 / 3 / 4 / 5 / 6 / 7+ years of experience as an admin.

Your Numeric Answer: 5
Your Comments:

Q#5. Completely optional, as all these questions are completely optional: which candidates did you support this year, and why?

Your List-Of-Usernames You Supported: prefer not to answer
Your Comments:

The Quick&Easy End. Thank you for your answers. Please sign with your Wikipedia username here, especially important if you are emailing your answers, so we can avoid double-counting and similar confusion.

Your Wikipedia Username: Gobautista
General Comments:

the extended exit poll, estimated time required: depends

Q#6. Completely optional, as all these questions are completely optional: which candidates did you oppose this year, and why?

Your List-Of-Usernames You Opposed:
Your Comments:

Q#7. Are there any Wikipedians you would like to see run for ArbCom, in the December 2016 election, twelve months from now? Who?

Your List-Of-Usernames As Potential Future Candidates:
Your Comments:

Q#8. Why did you vote in the 2015 ArbCom elections? In particular, how did you learn about the election, and what motivated you to participate this year?

Your Answer:
Your Comments:

Q#9. For potential arbs, good indicators of the right kind of contributions outside noticeboard activity, would be:

^A: discussions on the talkpages of articles which ARE subject to ArbCom sanctions

^B: discussions on the talkpages of articles NOT subject to ArbCom restrictions

^C: sending talkpage notifications e.g. with Twinkle, sticking to formal language

^D: sending talkpage notifications manually, and explaining with informal English

^E: working on policies/guidelines

^F: working on essays/helpdocs

^G: working on GA/FA/DYK/similar content

^H: working on copyedits/infoboxes/pictures/similar content

^I: working on categorization e.g. with HotCat

^J: working on autofixes e.g. with AWB or REFILL

^K: working with other Wikipedians via wikiprojects e.g. with MILHIST

^L: working with other Wikipedians via IRC e.g. with #wikipedia-en-help ^connect or informally

^M: working with other Wikipedians via email e.g. with UTRS or informally

^N: working with other Wikipedians in person e.g. at edit-a-thons / Wikipedian-in-residence / Wikimania / etc

^O: other types of contribution, please specify in your comments

Please specify a comma-separated list of the types of contributions you see as positive indicators for arb-candidates to have.

Your List-Of-Letters Answer:
Your Comments:

Q#10. Arbs who make many well-informed comments at these noticeboards (please specify which!) have the right kind of background, or experience, for ArbCom.

Options: ^A: AE, ^B: arbCases, ^C: LTA, ^D: OTRS, ^E: AN,

continued: ^F: OS/REVDEL, ^G: CU/SPI, ^H: AN/I, ^I: pageprot, ^J: NAC,

continued: ^K: RfC, ^L: RM, ^M: DRN, ^N: EA, ^O: 3o,

continued: ^P: NPOVN, ^Q: BLPN, ^R: RSN, ^S: NORN, ^T: FTN,

continued: ^U: teahouse, ^V: helpdesk, ^W: AfC, ^X: NPP, ^Y: AfD,

continued: ^1: UAA, ^2: COIN, ^3: antiSpam, ^4: AIV, ^5: 3RR,

continued: ^6: CCI, ^7: NFCC, ^8: abusefilter, ^9: BAG, ^0: VPT,

continued: ^Z: Other_noticeboard_not_listed_here_please_wikilink_your_answer

Please specify a comma-separated list of the noticeboards you see as important background-experience for arb-candidates to have.

Your List-Of-Letters Answer:
Your Comments:

Q#11. Arbs who make many comments at these noticeboards (please specify!) have the wrong kind of temperament, or personality, for ArbCom.

Options: (same as previous question -- please see above)

Please specify a comma-separated list of the noticeboards you see as worrisome personality-indicators for arb-candidates to have.

Your List-Of-Letters Answer:
Your Comments:

Q#12. Anything else we ought to know?

Your Custom-Designed Question(s):
Your Custom-Designed Answer(s):

The Extended-Answers End. Thank you for your answers. Please sign with your Wikipedia username here, especially important if you are emailing your answers, so we can avoid double-counting and similar confusion.

Your Wikipedia Username:
General Comments:

Detailed Instructions: you are welcome to answer these questions via usertalk (easiest), or via email (for a modicum of privacy).

how to submit your answers , estimated time required: 2 minutes

If you wish to answer via usertalk, go ahead and fill in the blanks by editing this subsection. Once you have completed the usertalk-based exit poll answers, click here to notify the Signpost copy-editor, leave a short usertalk note, and click save. The point of leaving the usertalk note, is to make sure your answers are processed and published.
If you wish to answer via email, create a new email to the Signpost column-editor by clicking Special:EmailUser/GamerPro64, and then paste the *plaintext* of the questions therein. Once you have completed the email-based exit poll answers, click here to notify the Signpost column-editor, leave a short usertalk note specifying the *time* you sent the email, and click save. The point of leaving the usertalk note, is to make sure your answers are processed and published (not stuck in the spam-folder).

Processing of responses will be performed in batches of ten, prior to publication in the Signpost. GamerPro64 will be processing the email-based answers, and will strive to maintain the privacy of your answers (as well as your email address and the associated IP address typically found in the email-headers), though of course as a volunteer effort, we cannot legally guarantee that GamerPro64 will have a system free from computer virii, we cannot legally guarantee that GamerPro64 will resist hypothetical bribes offered by the KGB/NSA/MI6 to reveal your secrets, and we cannot legally guarantee that GamerPro64 will make no mistakes. If you choose to answer on-wiki, your answers will be visible to other Wikipedians. If you choose to answer via email, your answers will be sent unencrypted over the internet, and we will do our best to protect your privacy, but unencrypted email is inherently an improper mechanism for doing so. Sorry! :-)

We do promise to try hard, not to make any mistakes, in the processing and presentation of your answers. If you have any questions or concerns, you may contact column-editor GamerPro64, copy-editor 75.108.94.227, or copy-editor Ryk72. Thanks for reading, and thanks for helping Wikipedia. GamerPro64 14:43, 9 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

January 2016[edit]

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Bicol Region may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "()"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

|languages = [[Philippine languages]] and Bicol dialects ([[Bikol language|Bikolano]], [[Bicolano (Albay)|Albayano]], [[Masbateño language|Masbateño]], [[

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 07:56, 9 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Bicol Region may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

|languages = [[Philippine languages]] and Bicol dialects ([[Bikol language|Bikolano]], [[Bicolano (Albay)|Albayano]], [[Masbateño language|Masbateño]], [[
<ref>http://nap.psa.gov.ph/ru5/overview/default.html The 2010 Census of Population and Housing], [[National Statistics Office]]</ref> The population sizes and growth rates of the region for

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 08:32, 9 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Non-free images in Bicol Region[edit]

Thank you for contributing to Wikipedia. We always appreciate when users upload new images. However, it appears that one or more of the images you have recently uploaded or added to a page, specifically Bicol Region, may fail our non-free image policy. Most often, this involves editors uploading or using a copyrighted image of a living person. For other possible reasons, please read up on our Non-free image criteria. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. -- Marchjuly (talk) 05:53, 1 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not re-add non-free logos to Bicol Region because such decorative usage does comply with Wikipedia:Non-free content criteria, which is policy. The files may be linked to using the colon trick or they may be removed altogehter, but they should not be displayed. If you have any questions about this, feel free to ask them here or at Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. -- Marchjuly (talk) 08:18, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open![edit]

Hello, Gobautista. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

June 2017[edit]

Hello, I'm BilCat. I noticed that you made a change to an article, KAI T-50 Golden Eagle, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so! If you need guidance on referencing, please see the referencing for beginners tutorial, or if you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. BilCat (talk) 09:42, 1 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2017 election voter message[edit]

Hello, Gobautista. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

January 2018[edit]

Please do not add promotional material to Wikipedia, as you did to List of shipbuilders and shipyards. While objective prose about beliefs, organisations, people, products or services is acceptable, Wikipedia is not intended to be a vehicle for soapboxing, advertising or promotion. Thank you. Alexf^(talk) 19:13, 25 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message[edit]

Hello, Gobautista. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: European Evangelical Alliance (July 18)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted because it included copyrighted content, which is not permitted on Wikipedia.

Wikipedia cannot accept material copied from elsewhere, unless it explicitly and verifiably has been released to the world under a suitably-free and compatible copyright license or into the public domain and is written in an acceptable tone—this includes material that you own the copyright to. You should attribute the content of a draft to outside sources, using citations, but copying and pasting or closely paraphrasing sources is not acceptable. The entire draft should be written using your own words and structure. Note to reviewers: do not leave copyright violations sitting in the page history. Please follow the instructions here.

You are welcome to write an article on the subject, but please do not use copyrighted work.

Draft:European Evangelical Alliance may be deleted at any time unless the copied text is removed. Copyrighted work cannot be allowed to remain on Wikipedia.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page. or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Curb Safe Charmer (talk) 15:40, 18 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Draft:Association of Evangelicals in Africa[edit]

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Draft:Association of Evangelicals in Africa requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be an unambiguous copyright infringement. This page appears to be a direct copy from aeafrica.org/about. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images taken from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites or other printed material as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If the external website or image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text or image — which means allowing other people to use it for any reason — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. The same holds if you are not the owner but have their permission. If you are not the owner and do not have permission, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for how you may obtain it. You might want to look at Wikipedia's copyright policy for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. CodeLyoko^buzz 15:45, 18 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

List of SB19 concert tours moved to draftspace[edit]

An article you recently created, List of SB19 concert tours, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. CASSIOPEIA^(talk) 16:52, 14 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of List of SB19 concert tours[edit]

The article List of SB19 concert tours has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Same exact information is available, in same form, in article on SB19. No need for separate article.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Postcard Cathy (talk) 01:28, 22 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2019 election voter message[edit]

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:16, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: ShowBT Philippines Corporation (November 19)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Curb Safe Charmer was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of organizations and companies). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:ShowBT Philippines Corporation and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:ShowBT Philippines Corporation, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{db-self}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Curb Safe Charmer (talk) 09:54, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: List of SB19 concert tours (January 19)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Robert McClenon was:

This draft is a request to spin out an article, a form of splitting. Proposals to spin out a topic from an article into another stand-alone article should be discussed at the talk page of the existing article. This does not mean that the draft should be spun out, and it does not mean that the draft should not be spun out. It does mean that discussion should be on the talk page of the existing article. (If this draft is resubmitted without discussion on the talk page of the existing article, it may be Rejected or nominated for deletion.) Discuss at Talk:SB19 whether to spin out this list into a separate article or whether to include it in the existing parent article.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:List of SB19 concert tours and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:List of SB19 concert tours, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{db-self}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Robert McClenon (talk) 04:53, 19 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Draft:ShowBT Philippines Corporation concern[edit]

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:ShowBT Philippines Corporation, a page you created, has not been edited in 5 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 01:35, 20 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:ShowBT Philippines Corporation[edit]

Hello, Gobautista. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "ShowBT Philippines Corporation".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! UnitedStatesian (talk) 15:25, 20 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

June 2020[edit]

Hello, I'm Subwaymuncher. I noticed that you recently removed content from SB19 without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the removed content has been restored. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. - SUBWAY 12:30, 7 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Draft:List of SB19 concert tours concern[edit]

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:List of SB19 concert tours, a page you created, has not been edited in 5 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 01:27, 20 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:List of SB19 concert tours[edit]

Hello, Gobautista. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "List of SB19 concert tours".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! UnitedStatesian (talk) 22:40, 19 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message[edit]

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:33, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

April 2021[edit]

Your edit to Catanduanes State University has been removed in whole or in part, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without evidence of permission from the copyright holder. If you are the copyright holder, please read Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for more information on uploading your material to Wikipedia. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted material, including text or images from print publications or from other websites, without an appropriate and verifiable license. All such contributions will be deleted. You may use external websites or publications as a source of information, but not as a source of content, such as sentences or images—you must write using your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously, and persistent violators of our copyright policy will be blocked from editing. See Wikipedia:Copying text from other sources for more information. This is your final warning. Further violation of Wikipedia's copyright policy will result in you being blocked from editing. — Diannaa (talk) 17:15, 3 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: ShowBT Philippines Corp. (April 21)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by CommanderWaterford was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of organizations and companies). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:ShowBT Philippines Corp. and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:ShowBT Philippines Corp., click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

CommanderWaterford (talk) 07:54, 21 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: ShowBT Philippines Corp. (April 21)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by KylieTastic was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of organizations and companies). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:ShowBT Philippines Corp. and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:ShowBT Philippines Corp., click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

KylieTastic (talk) 18:47, 21 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: 1st.One (May 2)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by HitroMilanese was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of music-related topics). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:1st.One and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:1st.One, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Hitro talk 08:29, 2 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: ShowBT Philippines Corp. (July 22)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Timtrent was:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Youtube is not valid as a reference. Nor are simplistic TV (etc) listings. We require references from significant coverage about the topic of the article, and independent of it, in multiple secondary sources which are WP:RS please. See WP:42. Please also see WP:PRIMARY which details the limited permitted usage of primary sources and WP:SELFPUB which has clear limitations on self published sources. Providing sufficient references, ideally one per fact referred to, that meet these tough criteria is likely to allow this article to remain. Lack of them or an inability to find them is likely to mean that the topic is not suitable for inclusion, certainly today.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:ShowBT Philippines Corp. and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:ShowBT Philippines Corp., click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Fiddle^Timtrent Faddle^Talk to me 10:11, 22 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: ShowBT Philippines Corp. (August 9)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Sahaib3005 was:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:ShowBT Philippines Corp. and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:ShowBT Philippines Corp., click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Sahaib3005 (talk) 16:27, 9 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: ShowBT Philippines Corp. (August 24)[edit]

Your recent article submission has been rejected. If you have further questions, you can ask at the Articles for creation help desk or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help. The reason left by HighKing was: This topic is not sufficiently notable for inclusion in Wikipedia. The comment the reviewer left was: Four previous declines highlighting lack of adequate sources to establish notability. No improvements made to sourcing. The topic is about an organization therefore must meet WP:NCORP guidelines. NCORP requires (at least) two references that contain *both* in-depth information *about* the *organization* and "Independent Content" (see WP:ORGIND for explanation). Notability is not determined by the volume of references, but the quality, so adding more references relying on announcements, interviews, etc, doesn't help when assessing the criteria for notability. Notability is also not inherited. None of the references in the article meet the criteria, as they rely on announcements or interviews or information provided by the company.

HighKing⁺⁺ 20:14, 24 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message[edit]

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:38, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Adding categories[edit]

If a person is already included in a subcategory (e.g. Category:Basketball players from Catanduanes), do not also add them to the parent category (which is in this case Category:People from Catanduanes). Please read WP:SUBCAT. ^{Engr. Smitty Werben} 16:44, 26 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Felip Jhon Suson (April 25)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Robertsky were:

This submission appears to read more like an advertisement than an entry in an encyclopedia. Encyclopedia articles need to be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources, not just to materials produced by the creator of the subject being discussed. This is important so that the article can meet Wikipedia's verifiability policy and the notability of the subject can be established. If you still feel that this subject is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia, please rewrite your submission to comply with these policies.

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of music-related topics). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

See WP:BANDMEMBER. Sources primarily label him as being part of SB19. Promotional writing as well.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Felip Jhon Suson and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Felip Jhon Suson, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

– robertsky (talk) 20:15, 25 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Can you clarify to me which part of the biography of this Music Artist is promotional? All the information was his biography, and he is a member of SB19. You can check all the references as well. I will improve it. I respect your judgment of the article, but I disagree that this is a promotional page. Evo1885 04:54, 26 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

half of Artistry section is uncited. Public image section is close paraphrasing. The original is promotional. The cross paraphrasing doesn't remove that. Use better sources, don't use kprofiles.net, spotify as references in prose content. – robertsky (talk) 06:39, 26 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hi @Robertsky I already updated the info of the biography of SB19's member Felip Jhon Suson. Please help me to approve this. It's an honor that the fans of SB19 will appreciate. Thank you. Evo1885 05:18, 26 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The notability as an individual artist is usually established when he has several notable works. See WP:BANDMEMBER. The majority of his work is SB19 related or derived through his work with SB19. Right now, I see only one solo song and one brand line. You are welcome to resubmit and let other reviewers look through, but my assessment stays the same. – robertsky (talk) 06:41, 26 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Robertsky Can you give me the quantity of music produce for an artist being included in Wikipedia. I will take note this. Thanks Evo1885 07:03, 26 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

There is no one number. However, many of us typically use 3 as the magical number. So, I should be looking at 3 individual works that's not related to the group. 3 lead songs, or 2 lead songs and 1 other individual item, etc. If he has a award related to the individual work or the work had charted, it will help with the notability. There is no rush to push the article up, in my opinion. For an artiste like him, it should be sooner than later his notability is established sufficiently. – robertsky (talk) 08:30, 26 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Robertsky I updated it again, and I included some of the music with the group he co-wrote. Thank you. Evo1885 07:10, 26 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, @Robertsky good day. Hope you are doing fine. Looking forward to supporting my created article about Draft:Felip Jhon Suson to be approved before May 29, 2022, a day release of his first Album. Thank you and more power to you. Evo1885 12:01, 25 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hi @RioHondo maybe you can help me to review and approve my article for Draft:Felip Jhon Suson , an artist and member of the boy group SB19. Thank you and have a nice day. Evo1885 04:31, 30 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Copying within Wikipedia requires attribution[edit]

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you copied or moved text from one or more pages into Television in the Philippines. While you are welcome to re-use Wikipedia's content, here or elsewhere, Wikipedia's licensing does require that you provide attribution to the original contributor(s). When copying within Wikipedia, this is supplied at minimum in an edit summary at the page into which you've copied content, disclosing the copying and linking to the copied page, e.g., copied content from [[page name]]; see that page's history for attribution. It is good practice, especially if copying is extensive, to also place a properly formatted {{copied}} template on the talk pages of the source and destination. Please provide attribution for this duplication if it has not already been supplied by another editor, and if you have copied material between pages before, even if it was a long time ago, you should provide attribution for that also. You can read more about the procedure and the reasons at Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia. Thank you. — Diannaa (talk) 16:00, 29 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

May 2022[edit]

Hello. This is a message to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions, such as the edit(s) you made to Bongbong Marcos, did not appear to be constructive and have been reverted. Please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at our welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make test edits, please use your sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. Hello! This is a general note due to your recent edits to the Bongbong Marcos page. The content you are adding is already found in both an earlier section of the intro article and the politics section of the article. I am assuming in good faith that you simply have not yet seen these sections. So please be advised that you are adding duplicate content. If you have any other issues with the article please do feel free to bring them up on the talk page. It would also be helpful if you add edit summaries as the majority of your edits don't seem to have them despite the relatively large content addition. Firekiino (talk) 08:50, 31 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your requests for protection...[edit]

Hi, please have a look at our protection policy before requesting more protections. Regards. Lectonar (talk) 08:57, 8 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for this @Lectonar. Evo1885 09:06, 8 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

June 2022[edit]

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you copied or moved text from SB19 into another page. While you are welcome to re-use Wikipedia's content, here or elsewhere, Wikipedia's licensing does require that you provide attribution to the original contributor(s). When copying within Wikipedia, this is supplied at minimum in an edit summary at the page into which you've copied content, disclosing the copying and linking to the copied page, e.g., copied content from [[page name]]; see that page's history for attribution. It is good practice, especially if copying is extensive, to also place a properly formatted {{copied}} template on the talk pages of the source and destination. Please provide attribution for this duplication if it has not already been supplied by another editor, and if you have copied material between pages before, even if it was a long time ago, you should provide attribution for that also. You can read more about the procedure and the reasons at Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia. Thank you. -- EN-Jungwon 15:15, 24 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you @EN-Jungwon. I Appreciate your message. This will help me for my next edit. I will fix some of the article I edited today. Evo1885 15:24, 24 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: ShowBT Entertainment (June 25)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by HitroMilanese was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of organizations and companies). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Does not appear to meet WP:NCOMPANY. Also see WP:CORPDEPTH.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:ShowBT Entertainment and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:ShowBT Entertainment, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Hitro talk 08:22, 25 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: List of awards and nominations received by SB19 (June 26)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Robert McClenon was:

Thank you for your submission, but the subject of this article already exists in Wikipedia. You can find it and improve it at List of awards and nominations received by SB19 instead.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Two copies of this page have been created, in draft space and in article space. It is not necessary to create two copies of the same page, and it annoys the reviewers. This is sometimes done in order to bypass Articles for Creation review. However, if a submitter is ready to have the article in article space, it can be moved into article space, rather than creating a copy. It is common for a page that has been duplicated in draft space and in article space to be nominated for deletion or proposed for deletion.

If the article is kept, this draft should be redirected to the article. If the article is deleted, this draft may be kept for future improvement.

There was a redirect in article space to the band. The author of this draft has also replaced the redirect with this list. A decision as to whether the list should be standalone is a separate question from this draft, which is declined as duplicating the article.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:List of awards and nominations received by SB19 and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:List of awards and nominations received by SB19, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Robert McClenon (talk) 04:05, 26 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: ShowBT Entertainment (July 19)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Devonian Wombat was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of organizations and companies). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Only one secondary source seems to give significant coverage to the company itself.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:ShowBT Entertainment and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:ShowBT Entertainment, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Devonian Wombat (talk) 23:13, 19 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Devonian WombatHi may I ask how this kind of corporate articles XIX Entertainment passed to your standard? What is your bases? Kindly enlighten me. Thank you. Evotista 02:44, 20 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

WP:CORPDEPTH and WP:NCORP, which are the guideline that all of us reviewers must follow when reviewing submissions, say that any article on a company has to have a number of independent, reliable sources that devote significant coverage to that company. At the moment, the last bit of that is this article's problem, most of the articles you used are about groups that are affiliated with ShowBT entertainment, such as 4th Impact and SB19, rather than about the company itself. What you need is a few more sources similar to source 8, which is the best reference currently used, in order to make the draft acceptable. The article isn't promotional or anything like that, so if you can improve the sourcing there should be no barriers to acceptance. Devonian Wombat (talk) 02:53, 20 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Devonian Wombat Why this one XIX Entertainment was approved? From what criteria this kind of article passed to your standard? Evotista 02:59, 20 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

As I did not approve that article, nor did it go through the AfC process, I cannot say. I will note it was created in 2011, when standards were lower than they are today. If you believe that they are not notable, you are welcome to nominate the article for deletion through the Wikipedia:Articles for Deletion process. Devonian Wombat (talk) 03:13, 20 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Devonian Wombat you know the standard more than I. You should do that instead. Practice what you preach. Thank you. Evotista 22:45, 20 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Josh Cullen Santos[edit]

The article you submitted to Articles for creation has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

jmarkfrancia (talk) 07:19, 5 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you @JmKissme. I really appreciate this. Evotista 12:48, 5 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Josh Cullen Santos moved to draftspace[edit]

An article you recently created, Josh Cullen Santos, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. DoubleGrazing (talk) 07:27, 5 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Josh Cullen Santos (September 5)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted because it included copyrighted content, which is not permitted on Wikipedia.

Wikipedia cannot accept material copied from elsewhere, unless it explicitly and verifiably has been released to the world under a suitably-free and compatible copyright license or into the public domain and is written in an acceptable tone—this includes material that you own the copyright to. You should attribute the content of a draft to outside sources, using citations, but copying and pasting or closely paraphrasing sources is not acceptable. The entire draft should be written using your own words and structure. Note to reviewers: do not leave copyright violations sitting in the page history. Please follow the instructions here.

You are welcome to write an article on the subject, but please do not use copyrighted work.

Draft:Josh Cullen Santos may be deleted at any time unless the copied text is removed. Copyrighted work cannot be allowed to remain on Wikipedia.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page. or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

DoubleGrazing (talk) 07:28, 5 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Stell (singer) (September 5)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Robert McClenon was:

Thank you for your submission, but the subject of this article already exists in Wikipedia. You can find it and improve it at Stell (singer) instead.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Two copies of this page have been created, in draft space and in article space. It is not necessary to create two copies of the same page, and it annoys the reviewers. This is sometimes done in order to bypass Articles for Creation review. However, if a submitter is ready to have the article in article space, it can be moved into article space, rather than creating a copy. It is common for a page that has been duplicated in draft space and in article space to be nominated for deletion or proposed for deletion. If the article is kept, this draft should be redirected to the article. If the article is deleted, this draft may be kept for future improvement.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Stell (singer) and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Robert McClenon (talk) 15:58, 5 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Justin de Dios (September 5)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Robert McClenon was:

Thank you for your submission, but the subject of this article already exists in Wikipedia. You can find it and improve it at Justin de Dios instead.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Two copies of this page have been created, in draft space and in article space. It is not necessary to create two copies of the same page, and it annoys the reviewers. This is sometimes done in order to bypass Articles for Creation review. However, if a submitter is ready to have the article in article space, it can be moved into article space, rather than creating a copy. It is common for a page that has been duplicated in draft space and in article space to be nominated for deletion or proposed for deletion. If the article is kept, this draft should be redirected to the article. If the article is deleted, this draft may be kept for future improvement.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Justin de Dios and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Robert McClenon (talk) 16:07, 5 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Josh Cullen Santos (September 5)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Robert McClenon was:

Thank you for your submission, but the subject of this article already exists in Wikipedia. You can find it and improve it at Josh Cullen Santos instead.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Two copies of this page have been created, in draft space and in article space. It is not necessary to create two copies of the same page, and it annoys the reviewers. This is sometimes done in order to bypass Articles for Creation review. However, if a submitter is ready to have the article in article space, it can be moved into article space, rather than creating a copy. It is common for a page that has been duplicated in draft space and in article space to be nominated for deletion or proposed for deletion. If the article is kept, this draft should be redirected to the article. If the article is deleted, this draft may be kept for future improvement.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Josh Cullen Santos and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Robert McClenon (talk) 16:18, 5 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

September 2022[edit]

Hi, and thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you tried to give a page a different title by copying its content and pasting either the same content, or an edited version of it, into Josh Cullen Santos. This is known as a "cut-and-paste move", and it is undesirable because it splits the page history, which is legally required for attribution. Instead, the software used by Wikipedia has a feature that allows pages to be moved to a new title together with their edit history.

In most cases for registered users, once your account is four days old and has ten edits, you should be able to move an article yourself using the "Move" tab at the top of the page (the tab may be hidden in a dropdown menu for you). This both preserves the page history intact and automatically creates a redirect from the old title to the new. If you cannot perform a particular page move yourself this way (e.g. because a page already exists at the target title), please follow the instructions at requested moves to have it moved by someone else. Also, if there are any other pages that you moved by copying and pasting, even if it was a long time ago, please list them at Wikipedia:Requests for history merge. Thank you. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 18:32, 5 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to SB19, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear to be constructive and has been reverted. If you only meant to make a test edit, please use your sandbox for that. Thank you. Td^fem 17:44, 21 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Josh Cullen Santos[edit]

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Josh Cullen Santos requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be an unambiguous copyright infringement. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images taken from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites or other printed material as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If the external website or image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text or image — which means allowing other people to use it for any reason — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. The same holds if you are not the owner but have their permission. If you are not the owner and do not have permission, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for how you may obtain it. You might want to look at Wikipedia's copyright policy for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 01:31, 6 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

AfC notification: Draft:Stell (singer) has a new comment[edit]

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Stell (singer). Thanks! scope_creep^Talk 12:14, 7 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Josh Cullen Santos (September 8)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted because it included copyrighted content, which is not permitted on Wikipedia.

Wikipedia cannot accept material copied from elsewhere, unless it explicitly and verifiably has been released to the world under a suitably-free and compatible copyright license or into the public domain and is written in an acceptable tone—this includes material that you own the copyright to. You should attribute the content of a draft to outside sources, using citations, but copying and pasting or closely paraphrasing sources is not acceptable. The entire draft should be written using your own words and structure. Note to reviewers: do not leave copyright violations sitting in the page history. Please follow the instructions here.

You are welcome to write an article on the subject, but please do not use copyrighted work.

Draft:Josh Cullen Santos may be deleted at any time unless the copied text is removed. Copyrighted work cannot be allowed to remain on Wikipedia.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page. or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Akevsharma (talk) 07:22, 8 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of San Jose, Viga[edit]

The article San Jose, Viga has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Fails WP:GNG; all sources point to this existing, not being notable.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Howard the Duck (talk) 21:38, 9 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:ShowBT Philippines Corp.[edit]

Hello, Gobautista. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:ShowBT Philippines Corp., a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 08:02, 13 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message[edit]

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:10, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:ShowBT Philippines Corp.[edit]

Hello, Gobautista. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "ShowBT Philippines Corp.".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 07:32, 13 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Josh Cullen Santos (January 2)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Pichemist were:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

This submission does not appear to be written in the formal tone expected of an encyclopedia article. Entries should be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources. Please rewrite your submission in a more encyclopedic format. Please make sure to avoid peacock terms that promote the subject.

The comment the reviewer left was:

YouTube is not a reliable source, especially when making claims such as "Santos and family struggled financially"

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Josh Cullen Santos and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

_Signed, Pichemist ^{( Contribs | Talk )} 07:24, 2 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Template:Ken Suson (musician)[edit]

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a notice that the page you created, Template:Ken Suson (musician), was tagged as a test page under section G2 of the criteria for speedy deletion and has been or soon may be deleted. Please use the sandbox for any other test edits you may want to do. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. – Jonesey95 (talk) 14:46, 12 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:List of awards and nominations received by SB19[edit]

Hello, Gobautista. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:List of awards and nominations received by SB19, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 06:01, 29 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Managing a conflict of interest[edit]

Hello, Gobautista. We welcome your contributions, but if you have an external relationship with the people, places or things you have written about on the page SB19, you may have a conflict of interest (COI). Editors with a conflict of interest may be unduly influenced by their connection to the topic. See the conflict of interest guideline and FAQ for organizations for more information. We ask that you:

avoid editing or creating articles about yourself, your family, friends, colleagues, company, organization, clients, or competitors;
propose changes on the talk pages of affected articles (you can use the {{request edit}} template);
disclose your conflict of interest when discussing affected articles (see Wikipedia:Conflict of interest#How to disclose a COI);
avoid linking to your organization's website in other articles (see Wikipedia:Spam#External link spamming);
do your best to comply with Wikipedia's content policies.

In addition, you are required by the Wikimedia Foundation's terms of use to disclose your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution which forms all or part of work for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation. See Wikipedia:Paid-contribution disclosure.

Also, editing for the purpose of advertising, publicising, or promoting anyone or anything is not permitted. Thank you. -- Deepfriedokra (talk) 08:51, 9 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hi @Deepfriedokra Thank you for this reminder. I will take note on this. I am just concern because someone message me. But still thank you and appreciate this comment of yours. Evotista 09:28, 9 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Justin de Dios[edit]

Hello, Gobautista. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Justin de Dios, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 10:03, 12 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

YARA (group) moved to draftspace[edit]

An article you recently created, YARA (group), is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Hitro talk 06:37, 13 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Use of multiple accounts[edit]

Hello, Gobautista, welcome to Wikipedia and thank you for your contributions. Your editing pattern indicates that you may be using multiple accounts or coordinating editing with people outside Wikipedia, such as Evotista (talk · contribs). Our policy on multiple accounts usually does not allow this, and users who misuse multiple accounts may be blocked from editing. If you operate multiple accounts directly or with the help of another person, please disclose these connections. Thank you. 2A01:4C8:49:B2A2:D8D9:97FF:FE57:E2CC (talk) 12:26, 13 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I see you've just removed Evotista's name from your user page, but you've also signed yourself as Evotista in many of your posts above, and Evotista uploads a lot of promotional photos to Commons, and then links them to articles you've started.

I also notice that Evotista on Twitter account, which you've just removed from your user page, retweets SB19 Wikipedia Team on Twitter a lot. Can you please explain? 2A01:4C8:49:B2A2:D8D9:97FF:FE57:E2CC (talk) 12:50, 13 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

March 2023[edit]

As previously advised, your edits give the impression you have a financial stake in promoting a topic, but you have not complied with Wikipedia's mandatory paid editing disclosure requirements. You were asked to cease editing until you responded by either stating that you are not being directly or indirectly compensated for your edits, or by complying with the mandatory requirements under the Wikimedia Terms of Use that you disclose your employer, client and affiliation. Again, you can post such a disclosure on your user page at User:Gobautista, and the template {{Paid}} can be used for this purpose – e.g. in the form: {{paid|user=Gobautista|employer=InsertName|client=InsertName}}. Please respond before making any other edits to Wikipedia. 2A01:4C8:49:B2A2:D8D9:97FF:FE57:E2CC (talk) 12:37, 13 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I only have 1 account this one. @Gobautista. User:Gobautista 14:14, 13 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

You still have not adequately responded or taken action to the inquiry regarding your appearance as an undisclosed paid editor. If you make any additional edits without complying, you may be blocked from editing. 331dot (talk) 14:02, 13 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@331dot I am not PAID. I love music and my energy is focus on writing related to entertainment, culture and nature. For my long years in wikipedia I will never ruined my reputation with money., The Money that I don't need but I have enough to sustain my needs until I die. I just happy to write. Thank you. User:Gobautista 14:13, 13 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Do you coordinate your editing with others off wiki? 331dot (talk) 14:20, 13 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@331dot As a writer and researcher you need to engage to some writers and authors of the content outside wikipedia to confirm the reliability of the information I need for my content or articles here in wikipedia. Because If your are a writer specially about biography never assume. We need facts. User:Gobautista 14:26, 13 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

So is that a yes? 331dot (talk) 14:29, 13 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@331dot Yes I talk to the writer of the news and author of the articles outside Wikipedia.. How do write your article then? How do you confirm yong written article is real? User:Gobautista 14:33, 13 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I've never contacted the writers of the sources I've used.(in some cases it's not possible) If it's not clear to me that the source can be trusted to accurately report I don't use it. 331dot (talk) 14:42, 13 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I'm more referring to other Wikipedia editors. 331dot (talk) 14:32, 13 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@331dot just like this Im having conversation with you now. I just replying when needed. User:Gobautista 14:35, 13 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I'm not talking about on-wiki communication. Noting that the only reason I'm bringing up Twitter is that you had a link on your user page- what about the Twitter "SB19 Wikipedia Team"? If anyone on this team is blocked from editing, that would make you a sockpuppet. 331dot (talk) 14:42, 13 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

You are suspected of sockpuppetry, which means that someone suspects you of using multiple Wikipedia accounts for prohibited purposes. Please make yourself familiar with the guide to responding to investigations, then, if you wish to do so, respond to the evidence at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Gobautista. Thank you. — Paper9oll (🔔 • 📝) 14:45, 13 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This account has been blocked indefinitely as a sockpuppet that was created to violate Wikipedia policy. Note that using multiple accounts is allowed, but using them for illegitimate reasons is not, and that all edits made while evading a block or ban may be reverted or deleted. If this account is not a sockpuppet, and you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}} below. 331dot (talk) 14:47, 13 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I will not ruined my account for this. User:Gobautista 14:49, 13 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@331dot How come you just easy to decide to block an account active editing and creating articles for long years. User:Gobautista 14:51, 13 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Please make an a unblock request and a heretofore uninvolved administrator will look into this and remove the block if they determine I made an error. 331dot (talk) 14:54, 13 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@331dot If you check my articles there is none illegitimate articles. I am proud that I write and edit all in my page. User:Gobautista 14:54, 13 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The merits of your edits are not currently at issue. It doesn't matter how good your edits are if you are socking. 331dot (talk) 14:55, 13 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@331dot Then may I know exact reason why you block my account? User:Gobautista 15:07, 13 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The reason is stated in the box above. I don't have anything else to say. 331dot (talk) 15:09, 13 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Request to Unblock[edit]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Gobautista (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

For years I am writing an articles close to my heart. Music, Culture, Arts, Geography and culture I will not ruined this account and waste time just to write illegitimate contents and articles. We are here as a role model and example to the next generation that only we are providing and writing information base on facts and verified informations. If your decision is final, my conscience is clear, you lost an active and loyal wikipedia supporter for long years, an asian content editor who just love writing and have a passion on research. I respect your decision. Thank you. User:Gobautista 15:04, 13 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

This does not address the concerns raised at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Gobautista. Frankly, it's going to be hard for you to claim you weren't using two accounts. I think you need to immediately honestly address the situation. Yamla (talk) 15:35, 13 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

I've removed the nowiki tags that suppressed the proper display. 331dot (talk) 15:08, 13 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Yamla, 331dot We all know in the corporate world that a leader with poor judgment is a dangerous leader to the organization and its members. You can block as you want but I am aware that a person doing this to an editor and loyal supporter for 10 years. I started editing dated Feb 13, 2013, and blocking my account today for that accusation is an insult and unacceptable. God bless you all. User:Gobautista 04:38, 14 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Yamla respect respect your opinion. For 10 years being here in wikipedia I will not argue with your judgement— Preceding unsigned comment added by Gobautista (talk • contribs)

If you choose not to do as Yamla advises, there is nothing more to do here. 331dot (talk) 16:04, 13 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hi User:Yamla User:331dot. Good day. We all know in the corporate world that a leader with poor judgment is a dangerous leader to the organization and its members. You can block editors as many as you want but I am aware that a person doing this to an editor and loyal supporter for 10 years. I started editing dated Feb 13, 2013, and blocking my account today for that accusation is an insult and unacceptable. God bless you both. Hoping that it's okay to accept that sometimes we have a wrong judgment to others. Keep it up. User:Gobautista 04:47, 14 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your judge is final right you have all the power and authority I don't need to defend my side. What I can say I am proudly supporter of Wikipedia for 10 years that's what I can say. Thank you for trusting me for 10 years. User:Gobautista 16:08, 13 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The opinion is only final if you choose to not dispute it further. Most people who didn't do as claimed would dispute it, but you don't have to. 331dot (talk) 16:11, 13 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@331dot I will not dispute because you have wrong judgement and action. As an admin you should further investigate before acting like powerful admin. I will not explain but you are wrong. Thank you. Keep up the good work then. God bless you. User:Gobautista 04:17, 14 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

That's your choice. If it were me, I would appeal to everyone who would listen up to ArbCom if need be if such a wrong thing was done to me, but again, it's your choice. 331dot (talk) 09:46, 14 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@331dot @Yamla

@Yamla I will not argue with your judgment guys. For my 10 years here at Wikipedia as an editor this is my first time being judged. My patience is high with this issue. And I will let you guys decide. I will not explain and defend my side any further. You have all the authority and power I am just a simple editor but a proudly loyal supporter that's what I can say. Thank you for trusting me for 10 years and judging me today. God bless everyone. User:Gobautista 16:10, 13 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Goodbye, and may I recommend that you read Proverbs 10:9 when you get the chance. 2A01:4C8:49:B2A2:F4AF:B6FF:FEA4:4FAB (talk) 16:48, 13 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@2A01:4C8:49:B2A2:F4AF:B6FF:FEA4:4FAB thank you. User:Gobautista 01:08, 14 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@2A01:4C8:49:B2A2:F4AF:B6FF:FEA4:4FAB thank you for being judgemental. Matthew 7:1-5 User:Gobautista 01:11, 14 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Gobautista,

This block has nothing to do with the quality of articles you've worked on. It has to do with whether or not you have used multiple accounts illegitimately. If you haven't, you need to offer a plausible explanation for the arguments found at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Gobautista. If you have used multiple accounts, you need to acknowledge this, offer a statement that you understand Wikipedia's policy about sockpuppetry and state that you will no longer use more than one account or proxy edit for another account. You don't need to retire forever but if you want to continue editing again at some point, you need to discuss these accusations. Thank you. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 20:40, 13 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@Liz for my 10 years as editor here do you think I don't understand the policy? How can say that and coincide that I don't standard the policy? Prove your statement.. User:Gobautista 01:05, 14 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@Liz I Just want you to know that I am a supporter of Wikipedia and I know before supporting any organization you should know first its mission goals and objectives as a writer and researcher I know that I need to learn and read and understand its policy. Thank you for your comment, God bless. User:Gobautista 01:19, 14 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletion of Template:YARA navbox[edit]

Template:YARA navbox has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 20:49, 13 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:YARA (group)[edit]

A tag has been placed on Category:YARA (group) indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 20:53, 13 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletion of Template:1st.One[edit]

Template:1st.One has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. Starcheerspeaksnewslostwars^{Talk to me} 02:24, 15 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletion of Template:Ken Suson navbox[edit]

Template:Ken Suson navbox has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. Starcheerspeaksnewslostwars^{Talk to me} 02:36, 15 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletion of Template:Press Hit Play[edit]

Template:Press Hit Play has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. Starcheerspeaksnewslostwars^{Talk to me} 02:45, 15 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Justin de Dios[edit]

Hello, Gobautista. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Justin de Dios".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 00:50, 18 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Stell (singer)[edit]

Hello, Gobautista. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Stell (singer), a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 17:02, 20 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:ShowBT Entertainment[edit]

Hello, Gobautista. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:ShowBT Entertainment, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 17:03, 20 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Stell (singer)[edit]

Hello, Gobautista. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Stell".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 22:36, 2 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:ShowBT Entertainment[edit]

Hello, Gobautista. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "ShowBT Entertainment".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 22:37, 2 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:YARA (group)[edit]

Hello, Gobautista. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:YARA (group), a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 00:02, 21 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry, I can't resubmit that article because my IP was blocked already and and can't create and article nor update any information. Due to this harsh decision what I called it power trip I will not be able to share additional information that I know that will be helpful to some wikipedia user and subscriber. Thank you. User:Gobautista 04:45, 23 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Request to Unblock[edit]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Gobautista (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I hope this appeal finds you well. I am writing to respectfully appeal the decision to block my Wikipedia account Gobautista on the grounds of Sockpuppetry. I understand the importance of maintaining the integrity and credibility of Wikipedia, and I am deeply committed to upholding these standards. First and foremost, I would like to express my sincerest apologies if my actions or behavior inadvertently led to any misunderstanding. I assure you that any similarity in activity was purely coincidental and unintentional. As a dedicated contributor to Wikipedia for the past 10 years, I have always aimed to contribute valuable and accurate information to the platform. Throughout my time on Wikipedia, I have made diligent efforts to contribute substantiated articles that meet Wikipedia's guidelines for notability and verifiability. I acknowledge that there have been only a limited number of verified articles under my name, but this is due to my commitment to delivering quality content over quantity. My intent has always been to enhance the credibility of Wikipedia by adhering to its core principles. I have developed a profound appreciation for the platform's mission of providing reliable and accessible information to people around the world. It would be disheartening to see my account, along with its contributions, permanently restricted due to a misunderstanding. I genuinely believe that this is an overly harsh decision considering my track record and intentions. I kindly request the opportunity to provide any necessary explanations, clarifications, or evidence that might help in rectifying this situation. I am open to cooperating fully with any investigation that would help confirm my genuine commitment to contributing positively to Wikipedia. I understand that Wikipedia is maintained by a dedicated group of volunteers who work tirelessly to ensure the platform's accuracy and reliability. I greatly value the time and effort put in by the Wikipedia Administration Team and the community as a whole. I humbly request a reconsideration of the block placed on my account, taking into account my long-standing commitment to Wikipedia's principles. Thank you for your time and consideration of my request. I hope to have the opportunity to continue contributing constructively to Wikipedia in the future. Hoping for your understanding and grant my appeal to unblock my account. Thank you. Gobautista

Decline reason:

I concur with 331dot below. This request is essentially completely free of content and was likely written by an AI. Worse, Confirmed sockpuppetry as Baladiyahka. It's like you are trying to get banned and haven't the slightest intention of acting in good faith. Yamla (talk) 10:34, 23 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

If I were reviewing this(I'm not) I would decline it as you clearly wrote it with the aid of an AI bot; it's not an AI that is blocked, it is you. We want to hear from you. You should write your request in your own words. 331dot (talk) 08:54, 23 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Josh Cullen Santos[edit]

Hello, Gobautista. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Josh Cullen Santos".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. ✗plicit 14:18, 14 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]