User talk:GlobalPoliticalCulture

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

July 2018[edit]

Information icon Hello, I'm CataracticPlanets. Wikipedia is written by people who have a wide diversity of opinions, but we try hard to make sure articles have a neutral point of view. Your recent edit to Vox (website) seemed less than neutral and has been removed. If you think this was a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. CataracticPlanets (talk) 21:02, 27 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

You may want to read the policy at WP:SOAP. Wikipedia is not a place for you to advocate for your own political opinions, or promote a particular political point of view. CataracticPlanets (talk) 21:08, 27 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

You're still doing it. In fact, it's becoming increasingly clear that you are not here to create a NPOV encyclopedia. -Jason A. Quest (talk) 19:49, 29 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

September 2018[edit]

Stop icon with clock
You have been blocked from editing for a period of 3 days for persistently making disruptive edits. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.
If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  AGK [•] 20:31, 29 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

October 2018[edit]

Stop icon with clock
You have been blocked from editing for a period of 3 months for persistently making disruptive edits. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.
If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  AGK ■ 16:24, 13 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Immediately on the expiry of your prior block, I see you have resumed tendentiously editing – and edit warring over the very same content you have already (1) reverted back in many times and (2) been blocked for warring over previously.

You need to understand that Wikipedia has very clear policies about what sources are reliable, how to present information in a balanced manner, and how editors must conduct themselves when there are disagreements. Wikipedia is not the place for righting great wrongs.

If your resume this behaviour for a third time after this block expires, you will be indefinitely blocked on account of there being no prospect that you can constructively contribute to Wikipedia. If you are serious about contributing, I suggest you read and digest our community's policies. You plainly have either not read them or else regard them as unimportant. AGK ■ 16:28, 13 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinitely blocked[edit]

On further investigation, I have picked up your flagrant breach of Wikipedia's sock puppetry policy via WarrenSanders2020 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · nuke contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log).

You are therefore blocked indefinitely. You may not edit Wikipedia again except having successfully appealed your block.

Wikipedia's technical logs indicate that this user account has been or may be used abusively. It has been blocked indefinitely from editing to prevent abuse.

Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted.
If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you should review the guide to appealing blocks, and then appeal your block by adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}}. Note that anything you post in your unblock request will be public, so you may alternatively use the Unblock Ticket Request System to submit an appeal if it contains information that must be private.

Administrators: Checkusers have access to confidential system logs not accessible by the public or by administrators due to the Wikimedia Foundation's privacy policy. You must not loosen or remove this block, or issue an IP block exemption, without consulting with a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee. Administrators who undo checkuser blocks without permission from a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee may be summarily desysopped.

AGK ■ 17:54, 13 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]