User talk:Gladboy

Hello Gladboy, and Welcome to Wikipedia!

Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking or using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. Also, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field. Below are some useful links to facilitate your involvement.

Happy editing! Alison ☺ 13:31, 16 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Getting started
Introduction The five pillars of Wikipedia How to edit a page
Finding your way around
Table of contents Department directory
Editing articles
How to develop an article Manual of Style

Getting help
Frequently asked questions Cheatsheet Where to ask a question Help pages New contributors' help page
How you can help
Contributing to Wikipedia Community Portal Follow Wikipedia etiquette Practice civility

Gladiators[edit]

Hi Gladboy, thanks for the message. The Gladiators page was reduced greatly after some debate on the talkpage, owing to the fact that all of the information you've replaced is unsourced and not particularly noteworthy. Please consider reverting your changes as you've gone against concensus and as I don't want to break 3RR I'm happy to bring in some arbitration to get the best article possible Docta247 19:04, 28 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I really don't think the page should be kept the way you've left it. Long lists such as the ones you've inserted are discouraged in the Wikipedia list guidelines and none of the information you've inserted is sourced, which is very important to improve the quality of the article. I agree your version has more information, but in this case that's not what's important when it comes to an article of relatively small notability. The article should provide clear and concise information for people looking for information on the television series, certainly not an exhaustive list of contenders, winners, gladiators per series and unreadable, over-exhaustive material. I won't break 3RR but I will keep reverting as you've gone against the concensus established on the talk page, which I'd recommend having a look over. Keep editing; it's great to have the discussion to work towards the best article we can do. Docta247 19:47, 28 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I don't watch in on Challenge. It used to be something of a family event when I was a kid :-). Please consider changing it back because I will do so myself in line with the concensus established. Have a good night! Docta247 20:16, 28 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I'm worried that you've misunderstood here. We don't have to agree on this or come to some kind of equitable solution because you're choosing to ignore the rules and policies of Wikipedia. Please read Wikipedia:Verifiability, Wikipedia:WikiProject_Laundromat and understand that if you continue to ignore the former I will seek to have the article locked and you might be blocked for ignoring the rules. I seriously don't want it to come to that, so please return the article to its former state and use the talk page to discuss major changes you want to make. Docta247 11:50, 29 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome[edit]

Welcome!

Hello, Gladboy, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on discussion pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{helpme}} before the question. Again, welcome!

I'd encourage you to also read Wikipedia:Three-revert rule and Wikipedia:Verifiability. Pax:Vobiscum 17:42, 29 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Gladiators[edit]

I have reverted your massive unexplained deletions to this article. If there is a valid reason for removing this text, please include it in the Edit Summary. Owen× ☎ 19:41, 29 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Just FYI[edit]

I'm going to pass through your new pages and put WP:CONTEXT and WP:REF such as I did on The ashes 1. Bye -- Kl4m 19:46, 29 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

July 2007[edit]

If you feel there is a legitimate reason for removing this information, please explain your actions in the edit summary so that other editors do not mistake them for vandalism. Moonriddengirl 21:41, 29 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I'm not entirely sure what you're asking me. :) Gladiators is not on my regular patrol. The edits that you're making may well be legitimate, but if you don't explain why you're cutting so much text out in the edit summary, which is the box that appears before you save the changes, people on vandal patrol see the big red numbers and presume you don't have a good reason. If you've discussed these changes on Talk:Gladiators and there is consensus that the text should be removed, go ahead and cut it. Just put something like "see discussion page" as your explanation, and the folk on vandal patrol probably won't be so alarmed. If I'm not clear, please let me know, and I'll try to explain myself better. Moonriddengirl 21:51, 29 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, sorry it's me again. I think this is straightened out so please feel free to make the edits you feel would improve the main article, but add an edit summary in the box just below! Have a good night! Docta247 21:56, 29 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Gladiators pages[edit]

Hi - can you please sort out the mess you've made of these pages?

None of the articles show sufficient context - if I was a reader that clicked on one of these pages, I wouldn't know what it was on about. You need a paragraph at the start of each of them to explain - for instance "Season Five of [[Gladiators]] took place in 1996 at ...." and so on.
The titles of the articles need to be better - "The ashes 1" for example, doesn't mean anything - it needs to be "The ashes 1 (Gladiators episode)" or similar.
There are quite a few spelling and grammar errors - I've fixed most of the ones in the titles, but you need to check the articles thoroughly.
None of the pages are linked from the main Gladiators page, so how is anyone ever meant to find them?
Most importantly, I don't think any of these articles are noteworthy enough to have their own articles at all.

Please sort this out, or I'll have to revert the changes you've made. ELIMINATORJR ^TALK 11:48, 30 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Dale's Supermarket Sweep[edit]

Just because there is more information in an article doesn't make it better. The sentences like "Then there was the Mini Sweep in this the contestent had to answer a question then if the question was correct they had to get a item with a yellow sticker on saying Mini Sweep" and "Were contestents had there last chance to get time on there clocks for the Big Sweep if they got a question correct they changed a the other contestent had there turn" are completely unreadable, and even if they had correct spelling and grammar, they wouldn't mean anything to a casual reader. It's the same with the list of bonuses, and so on. Please think about someone who doesn't know anything about the show, and tries to read the article. ELIMINATORJR ^TALK 00:25, 31 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. I see you reverted the tidying I did of this page. Please explain on its talk page why you think your version is better. As your version stands it is fragmented, confusing, has many spelling errors, does not explain what the programme is or how it works and has incorrect, unreferenced facts. I have kept a lot of the information you previously added, thanks for that. But if you have anything further to add please add it to the current version. --Escape Orbit 21:04, 5 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thanks for resolving things with this page. You just have to remember that Wikipedia is a co-operative effort where everyone contributes. You put some good info on the page, it just needed tidied and referenced. I'm not sure what's up with the image, I didn't do any of those changes. It seems to have got confused with a Wheel Of Fortune image. Did you upload both? Are you sure you got them named correctly? --Escape Orbit 22:29, 7 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Gladboy, could you please stop reverting everyone's edits on Dale's Supermarket Sweep. You keep changing the infobox image, adding images which are no longer on WikiPedia, added the talkbackTHAMES website address, when there is absolutely no need for it, and plenty of un-needed words and lines.
GMc^talk 16:13, 16 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image tagging for Image:Glads dangerzone1.jpg[edit]

Thanks for uploading Image:Glads dangerzone1.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the source and creator of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the source and creator of the image on the image's description page, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided source information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 14:07, 2 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image (Image:Glads dangerzone1.jpg)[edit]

Thanks for uploading Image:Glads dangerzone1.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BetacommandBot 06:31, 4 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:Image:Blinddatetypicalscreenshot.jpg[edit]

Thanks for uploading or contributing to Image:Image:Blinddatetypicalscreenshot.jpg. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia constitutes fair use. Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. STBotI 22:53, 6 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:Supermarket Sweep Dale.jpg[edit]

Thanks for uploading or contributing to Image:Supermarket Sweep Dale.jpg. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia constitutes fair use. Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. STBotI 23:00, 6 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Your edits to Challenge and Supermarket Sweep pages[edit]

PLEASE Stop reverting changes on the Challenge page as neither of those shows are on Challenge at the moment and as for the Supermarket Sweep page please stop adding wrong information on that page and uploading the Wheel Of Fortune logo on there. If you add anymore wrong information on either of those pages or the other pages that you edit you will be blocked.

Challenge page[edit]

Thats much better now.

Image copyright problem with Image:Supermarket Sweep Dale.jpg[edit]

Image Copyright problem

Thank you for uploading Image:Supermarket Sweep Dale.jpg. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the image. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. STBotI 22:11, 9 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image copyright problem with Image:Blockbusters.jpg[edit]

Image Copyright problem

Thank you for uploading Image:Blockbusters.jpg. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the image. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. STBotI 22:22, 9 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image copyright problem with Image:Blockbusters.jpeg[edit]

Image Copyright problem

Thank you for uploading Image:Blockbusters.jpeg. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the image. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. STBotI 22:25, 9 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image copyright problem with Image:Wheel Of Fortune.jpg[edit]

Image Copyright problem

Thank you for uploading Image:Wheel Of Fortune.jpg. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the image. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. STBotI 22:29, 9 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Duplicate images uploaded[edit]

Thanks for uploading Image:Blockbusters.jpeg. A machine-controlled robot account noticed that you also uploaded the same image under the name Image:Blockbusters.jpg. The copy called Image:Blockbusters.jpg has been marked for speedy deletion since it is redundant. If this sounds okay to you, there is no need for you to take any action.

This is an automated message- you have not upset or annoyed anyone, and you do not need to respond. In the future, you may save yourself some confusion if you supply a meaningful file name and refer to 'my contributions' to remind yourself exactly which name you chose (file names are case sensitive, including the extension) so that you won't lose track of your uploads. For tips on good file naming, see Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions about this notice, or feel that the deletion is inappropriate, please contact User:Staecker, who operates the robot account. Staeckerbot 22:30, 9 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image copyright problem with Image:3-2-1.jpg[edit]

Image Copyright problem

Thank you for uploading Image:3-2-1.jpg. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the image. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. STBotI 14:48, 10 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image copyright problem with Image:Treasure Hunt.jpg[edit]

Image Copyright problem

Thank you for uploading Image:Treasure Hunt.jpg. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the image. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. STBotI 15:07, 10 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image tagging for Image:Interceptor.jpg[edit]

Thanks for uploading Image:Interceptor.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the source and creator of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the source and creator of the image on the image's description page, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided source information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 16:06, 10 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:Family Fortunes.jpg[edit]

Thanks for uploading or contributing to Image:Family Fortunes.jpg. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia constitutes fair use. Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. STBotI 20:10, 10 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image copyright problem with Image:Dont Try This At Home.jpg[edit]

Image Copyright problem

Thank you for uploading Image:Dont Try This At Home.jpg. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the image. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. STBotI 22:13, 10 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image tagging for Image:100%.jpg[edit]

Thanks for uploading Image:100%.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the source and creator of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the source and creator of the image on the image's description page, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided source information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 14:05, 11 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image copyright problem with Image:Captain Abercromby.jpg[edit]

Image Copyright problem

Thank you for uploading Image:Captain Abercromby.jpg. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the image. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. STBotI 17:59, 13 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image copyright problem with Image:Bodger and badger.jpeg[edit]

Image Copyright problem

Thank you for uploading Image:Bodger and badger.jpeg. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the image. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. STBotI 15:01, 14 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image copyright problem with Image:Bertha.jpeg[edit]

Image Copyright problem

Thank you for uploading Image:Bertha.jpeg. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the image. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. STBotI 15:10, 14 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

August 2007[edit]

Please do not add inappropriate images to Wikipedia; it is considered to be vandalism. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you._TheIslander 23:50, 14 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop adding inappropriate images to Wikipedia. If you continue, you will be blocked from editing. _TheIslander 17:29, 15 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image tagging for Image:Ant and dec's saturday night takeaway.jpg[edit]

Thanks for uploading Image:Ant and dec's saturday night takeaway.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the source and creator of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the source and creator of the image on the image's description page, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided source information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 00:05, 15 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Bodger and Badger[edit]

Please do not assume ownership of articles such as Bodger and Badger. If you aren't willing to allow your contributions to be edited extensively or be redistributed by others, please do not submit them. Thank you. _TheIslander 12:33, 15 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image copyright problem with Image:The Moment Of Truth.jpg[edit]

Image Copyright problem

Thank you for uploading Image:The Moment Of Truth.jpg. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the image. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. STBotI 16:39, 15 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image copyright problem with Image:Cbbc On Choice.jpg[edit]

Image Copyright problem

Thank you for uploading Image:Cbbc On Choice.jpg. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the image. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. STBotI 21:49, 15 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Article for Speedy Deletion[edit]

A tag has been placed on Cbbc On Choice, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done for the following reason:

This info should be included in the article BBC Choice - it is not notable in itself.

Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not meet very basic Wikipedia criteria may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as an appropriate article, and if you can indicate why the subject of this article is appropriate, you may contest the tagging. To do this, add {{hangon}} on the top of the page and leave a note on the article's talk page explaining your position. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would confirm its subject's notability under the guidelines.

For guidelines on specific types of articles, you may want to check out our criteria for biographies, for web sites, for bands, or for companies. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. _TheIslander 21:52, 15 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image tagging for Image:Fort_boyard.jpg[edit]

Thanks for uploading Image:Fort_boyard.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the source and creator of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the source and creator of the image on the image's description page, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided source information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 06:13, 16 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not remove[edit]

Please do not remove Articles for deletion notices from articles or remove other people's comments in Articles for deletion pages. The notices and comments are needed to establish community consensus about the status of an article, and removing them is considered vandalism. If you oppose the deletion of an article, you may comment at the respective page instead. Thank you. _TheIslander 12:34, 16 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop. If you continue removing Articles for deletion notices or comments from articles and Articles for deletion pages, as you did with CBBC On Choice, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. _TheIslander 13:06, 16 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Last chance[edit]

Hi there. I'm not sure if you're totally aware of it here, but you're being massively disruptive right now. You've been uploading a large amount of images which, not only are they unsuitable for Wikipedia due to copyright issues, but are also unlicensed. A number of editors have tried to contact you about it but you either ignore their comments or remove them from your talk page.

If you persist along these lines, I will be forced to block your account for a short while for disruption. Please stop what you're doing here and let's talk about it - Alison ☺ 13:16, 16 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Your comment[edit]

That's perfectly all right. I can see you've been creating BBC articles but there are a few problems and it's obvious that your work is done in good faith. I've no doubt that between myself and theIslander, we should be able to get you up and running quickly enough - we were all new editors at one time :) It's gone 6am here and I've to get to bed but I'll be back on-line in about 4 hours and I'll see what I can do. In the meantime, I'll add a welcome template to your talk page. Best thing, maybe, is to have a read through our help pages and hints & see what we allow here - Alison ☺ 13:30, 16 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Images[edit]

Gladboy, it's really not a great idea to remove pictures that a bot (or in fact an editor) has picked up as a copyright violation. Like Alison and myself have stated, unfortunatly that could lead to a ban :(. It's possibly best to steer clear of adding images altogether until you're crystal clear on the copyright laws, fair-use, rationales etc. Cheers, _TheIslander 14:27, 16 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image copyright problem with Image:Bodger and badger.jpeg[edit]

Image Copyright problem

Thank you for uploading Image:Bodger and badger.jpeg. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the image. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. STBotI 22:23, 17 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Springbok challenge 2[edit]

Could you elaborate on this article just what the Springbok challenge is, judging by your other articles it seems to be some sort of Gladiator activity but the article doesn't mention it nor quote a source for it. --Stalfur 15:21, 6 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image tagging for Image:Greenclaws.jpg[edit]

Thanks for uploading Image:Greenclaws.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the source and creator of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the source and creator of the image on the image's description page, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided source information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 21:12, 8 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free media (Image:Cbbc On Choice.jpg)[edit]

Thanks for uploading Image:Cbbc On Choice.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BetacommandBot 05:18, 25 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Gladiators logo.JPG[edit]

Thanks for uploading Image:Gladiators logo.JPG. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 14:26, 2 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Gladiators season 1[edit]

A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Gladiators season 1, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page. Also, please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. If you agree with the deletion of the article, and you are the only person who has made substantial edits to the page, please add {{db-author}} to the top of Gladiators season 1. Darkspots (talk) 23:49, 7 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Gladiators season 2[edit]

A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Gladiators season 2, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page. Also, please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. If you agree with the deletion of the article, and you are the only person who has made substantial edits to the page, please add {{db-author}} to the top of Gladiators season 2. Darkspots (talk) 23:50, 7 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Gladiators season 3[edit]

A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Gladiators season 3, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page. Also, please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. If you agree with the deletion of the article, and you are the only person who has made substantial edits to the page, please add {{db-author}} to the top of Gladiators season 3. Darkspots (talk) 23:52, 7 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Gladiators season 5[edit]

A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Gladiators season 5, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page. Also, please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. If you agree with the deletion of the article, and you are the only person who has made substantial edits to the page, please add {{db-author}} to the top of Gladiators season 5. Darkspots (talk) 23:55, 7 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image copyright problem with Image:DalesSupermarketSweep.Jpg[edit]

Thanks for uploading Image:DalesSupermarketSweep.Jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by STBotI. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. STBotI (talk) 18:19, 12 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image copyright problem with Image:DalesSupermarketSweep.jpeg[edit]

Thanks for uploading Image:DalesSupermarketSweep.jpeg. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by STBotI. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. STBotI (talk) 18:32, 12 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Cbbc Choice[edit]

The article Cbbc Choice has been speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This was done because the article, which appeared to be about a real person, organization (band, club, company, etc.), or web content, did not indicate how or why the subject is notable, that is, why an article about that subject should be included in Wikipedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not indicate the notability of the subject may be deleted at any time. If you can indicate why the subject is really notable, you are free to re-create the article, making sure to cite any verifiable sources.

Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, and for specific types of articles, you may want to check out our criteria for biographies, for web sites, for musicians, or for companies. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. NawlinWiki (talk) 11:44, 27 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hi mate, Sorry about putting the youtube links on the Bernard's Watch page. Would you be interested in improving the Bernards Watch coverage on wikipedia? I started List of Bernard's Watch episodes but need to add episode summaries, which you might be able to help with. Cheers. 03 md 23:11, 11 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free media (File:Gladiators logo.JPG)[edit]

Thanks for uploading File:Gladiators logo.JPG. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Werieth (talk) 15:49, 31 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open![edit]

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 17:36, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]