User talk:GinaJay

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Welcome![edit]

Hello, GinaJay, and Welcome to Wikipedia!

Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking or or by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your username and the date. Also, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field. Below are some useful links to facilitate your involvement. Happy editing! भास्कर्bhagawati Speak 11:52, 31 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Getting started
Finding your way around
Editing articles
Getting help
How you can help

GinaJay, you are invited to the Teahouse[edit]

Teahouse logo

Hi GinaJay! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia.
Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from peers and experienced editors. I hope to see you there! Ryan Vesey (I'm a Teahouse host)

This message was delivered automatically by your robot friend, HostBot (talk) 01:17, 4 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

WikiWomen's Collaborative: Come join us (and check out our new website)![edit]

WikiWomen - We need you!
Hi GinaJay! The WikiWomen's Collaborative is a group of women from around the world who edit Wikipedia, contribute to its sister projects, and support the mission of free knowledge. We recently updated our website, created new volunteer positions, and more!

Get involved by:

  • Visiting our website for resources, events, and more
  • Meet other women and share your story in our profile space
  • Participate at and "like" our Facebook group
  • Join the conversation on our Twitter feed
  • Reading and writing for our blog channel
  • Volunteer to write for our blog, recruit blog writers, translate content, and co-run our Facebook and receive perks for volunteering
  • Already participating? Take our survey and share your experience!

Thanks for editing Wikipedia, and we look forward to you being a part of the Collaborative! -- SarahStierch (talk) 21:39, 12 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The Teahouse Turns One![edit]

It's been an exciting year for the Teahouse and you were a part of it. Thanks so much for visiting, asking questions, sharing answers, being friendly and helpful, and just keeping Teahouse an awesome place. You can read more about the impact we're having and the reflections of other guests and hosts like you. Please come by the Teahouse to celebrate with us, and enjoy this sparkly cupcake badge as our way of saying thank you. And, Happy Birthday!


Teahouse First Birthday Badge Teahouse First Birthday Badge
Awarded to everyone who participated in the Wikipedia Teahouse during its first year!

To celebrate the many hosts and guests we've met and the nearly 2000 questions asked and answered during this excellent first year, we're giving out this tasty cupcake badge.

Earn more badges at: Teahouse Badges
--Ocaasi and the rest of the Teahouse Team 22:27, 27 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

GA Nom for Adam Levine[edit]

Howdy- I recently reviewed your nomination for Adam Levine to become a good article. I did not feel that it currently met the criteria. However, looking at the fact that there are several editors (beyond yourself) who have significantly contributed to this article recently, I did decide to put it on hold for a week, to see if it can be brought up to par. You can find my review and suggestions for improvement here. I will let the other editors know. I will check back in within the next few days to see if progress is being made, and will make my decision in one week. Thank you for your contributions. PrairieKid (talk) 06:12, 6 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Congrats! It passed! Welcome to GA, Adam Levine! Nice work GinaJay! PrairieKid (talk) 17:13, 13 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Yeaah! And thank you PrairieKid for being a not-overly-critical-yet-reasonably-thorough reviewer. Cheers! GinaJay (talk) 18:43, 13 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]
I added him to the GA Other Music list... Sorry, I completely forgot to do that. I'm glad you noticed. PrairieKid (talk) 14:34, 18 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for The Age of Miracles (novel)[edit]

Alex ShihTalk 00:03, 28 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Barnstar[edit]

The Content Creativity Barnstar
For The Age of Miracles, apparently your first effort in creating an article. And a good one. — Daniel Case (talk) 03:56, 28 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Full disclosure: I read this book last Christmas on my iPad's Kindle app, along with The Last Policeman, and thought about creating an article about it as well. But you got there first. So I just did some stuff around the edges. Good job! I'd like to see you do more of this. Daniel Case (talk) 03:56, 28 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Ah, the joy of my first barnstar! Thank you, appreciate it very much. GinaJay (talk) 07:14, 29 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

A Barnstar for you![edit]

The "This Will be FA" Barnstar
I still have the Adam Levine page on my watchlist and have noticed you were continuing to edit it. I was going to come and ask if you were considering making it an FA. I was absolutely elated that you had already nominated it! Thanks for the work! I'll give it a once-over and see you on the review page. I am so sorry for the pun in this barnstar... I blame Maroon 5 for not making a song title I could use and forcing me to get creative. PrairieKid (talk) 17:02, 9 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you for the barnstar, that means a lot! Also, the pun's pretty good - better than Moves Like FA, which is what I would have wrote, and is, admittedly, downright horrible. GinaJay (talk) 18:09, 10 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for Tell The Wolves I'm Home[edit]

Thanks and have a good weekend Victuallers (talk) 16:02, 15 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for The Girl With All The Gifts[edit]

Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 19:10, 11 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Big Little Lies (novel) (June 23)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Eclipsed was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
-- Eclipsed (talk) (email) 10:34, 23 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

DYK nomination of Big Little Lies (novel)[edit]

Hello! Your submission of Big Little Lies (novel) at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! Edwardx (talk) 20:48, 24 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for Big Little Lies (novel)[edit]

Gatoclass (talk) 12:01, 16 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:59, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:Big Little Lies (novel), a page you created, has not been edited in 6 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 01:31, 24 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2017 election voter message[edit]

Hello, GinaJay. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Girls Burn Brighter has been accepted[edit]

Girls Burn Brighter, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. If your account is more than four days old and you have made at least 10 edits you can create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

Bennv3771 (talk) 21:20, 16 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2019 election voter message[edit]

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:15, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Draft:Fleishman is in Trouble, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, group, product, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. DGG ( talk ) 10:12, 26 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Fleishman Is in Trouble has been accepted[edit]

Fleishman Is in Trouble, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. If your account is more than four days old and you have made at least 10 edits you can create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

97198 (talk) 13:00, 30 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: The Farm (Joanne Ramos novel) has been accepted[edit]

The Farm (Joanne Ramos novel), which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as C-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. If your account is more than four days old and you have made at least 10 edits you can create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

97198 (talk) 12:40, 27 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Such a Fun Age (January 11)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by AngusWOOF was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
AngusWOOF (barksniff) 17:01, 11 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for January 15[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited One Part Woman, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Tamil and The National (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:29, 15 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for April 1[edit]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Kumbalangi Nights, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Anwar Ali (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 12:33, 1 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Organized vandalism[edit]

I invite your attention to certain biased editors, who are constantly vandalising pages like Rima Kallingal, Aashiq Abu, Syam Pushkaran etc. with their political grudge. You can see them in edit history of these pages and related pages. I like your writing style, vast research, neutral and factual informations, and the way you contribute to articles etc. If you are willing, I invite you to re-write some articles. Please let me know Regards SnehaRaphael1996 (talk) 16:58, 7 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hi @SnehaRaphael1996: I went through the pages you mentioned. I agree that the content relating to the flood relief controversy violates WP:WEIGHT, WP:RECENT, WP:EDITORIALIZING etc. and needs to be condensed to a few neutral sentences. I'm sorry but I currently don't have the time to research and rewrite them. You could try discussing the matter in the article's talk page with the editor (and hopefully encourage them to get a better idea of the policies mentioned above if they want to contribute constructively to Wikipedia). I hope reverts by biased IP editors don't deter you from keeping up the good work you do at WikiProject Kerala. Regards, GinaJay (talk) 11:08, 8 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for The Silent Patient[edit]

On 2 August 2020, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article The Silent Patient, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that the novel The Silent Patient was inspired by the Athenian tragedy Alcestis? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/The Silent Patient. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, The Silent Patient), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

Cwmhiraeth (talk) 00:01, 2 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of Kumbalangi Nights[edit]

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Kumbalangi Nights you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Ex Parte -- Ex Parte (talk) 05:25, 8 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of Kumbalangi Nights[edit]

The article Kumbalangi Nights you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Kumbalangi Nights for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already appeared on the main page as a "Did you know" item, or as a bold link under "In the News" or in the "On This Day" prose section, you can nominate it within the next seven days to appear in DYK. Bolded names with dates listed at the bottom of the "On This Day" column do not affect DYK eligibility. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Ex Parte -- Ex Parte (talk) 17:22, 8 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message[edit]

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:33, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]