User talk:Giagi

Re:Collaboration[edit]

No problem at all. I'll check over the grammar, and see if all fits well. Regards. Cs-wolves (talk) 13:30, 13 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Formula Abarth[edit]

Hi, good to see you're taking an interest in some of the less well covered series.

I had nothing to do with the attaching of numbers to entered drivers in 2010, so I don't know where he got that from and if he's right or not.
The idea behind giving the drivers a link is just in case pages are created for some of them further down the line: it's not to say that I or anyone else is planning on creating pages for them now, most of them are nowhere near notable enough yet and haven't been around very long in post-Karting level motorsport. If a current red-linked driver page is created at some point, this method just means that we don't have to link the names to the pages at a later date. Plus, I also think it looks neater if either all or none of the driver/team names are linked.
Perhaps the Raffaele Marciello page could be created if he is quite successful in the series but bear in mind that even past winners of Formula Azzurra, who are now in Italian F3 don't yet have pages created for them, so notability will come at a much later stage. I would imagine also that the page for Jordi Cunill will one day be created.

Officially Mr X (talk) 12:38, 21 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

8 & 9 were put aside for BVM at the Vallelunga test (see the Nuvolari link). Just a personal habit to put it into redlinks for creation. Marciello would be a prime example for creation, due to the FDA link, so fire away. Cs-wolves (talk) 13:08, 21 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Re: Auto GP[edit]

Good question. I know races are to be shown in the UK on Motors TV, although I am not aware of international TV schedules. You might want to have a look on their website which is here. Regards. Cs-wolves (talk) 13:07, 24 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Ouch! I have honestly no idea then. Sorry. Cs-wolves (talk) 14:02, 24 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Team Lotus / 1 Malaysia F1[edit]

Hi. I've reverted your recent edits to the 2011 Formula One season page, where you changed the Team Lotus entry to "1 Malaysia F1 Team". It has been the consenus both on page discussions and over at WP:F1 for some time that the team shall be known as Team Lotus until such time as we are told otherwise (i.e. by a court of law). I know you're only trying to make Wikipedia the best it can be, and I applaud you for that. But in future, I'd suggest checking out the page discussions and the WikiProject before making changes like this. A team name change and a legal dispute are significant events, but if you see the name has not been changed, it is perhaps worth considering that the page has been kept that way for a reason. Just take a moment to consider the changes you make before you do make them; for example, I noticed that you included a section in the Team Changes section about the legal dispute, but it's already there, making the entry a little redundant. I don't want to sound like I'm lecturing you; quite the contrary. If you're going to be a long-term editor of Formula 1-related pages, I suggest you head over to WP:F1 anyway. I like to think we're a pretty friendly bunch looking to make the Formula 1 pages better, and I'm sure we can use another pair of hands. Prisonermonkeys (talk) 14:23, 5 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Re:Same time[edit]

I think we can put that down as perfect timing! Cs-wolves (talk) 14:56, 23 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hmm...that seems strange, especially if drivers miss the final round having competed the rest of the season and aren't classified. That said, my Italian is non-existent and have no ability to read up on the sporting regulations! Yep, have noticed that the website links have changed, in reference to the pan-European series coming into play. Cs-wolves (talk) 15:18, 23 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Heh, unusual. I think wait until the CSAI update their own standings and see where it goes after the weekend... Cs-wolves (talk) 15:42, 23 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletion of Template:GP2 team[edit]

Template:GP2 team has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Dirtlawyer1 (talk) 11:47, 21 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open![edit]

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:50, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Logo arden.jpg[edit]

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Logo arden.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 03:35, 20 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Logo supernova.jpg[edit]

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Logo supernova.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:45, 24 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]