User talk:Georgette2

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This page is protected against editing from new users. If you cannot edit here, you may leave a message at my unprotected talk page. Please avoid trolling, sarcasm, and rudeness or your message may be simply removed.



Hi[edit]

Hi I'm new here and I thought you could help me...my friend suggested you....thanks for your help..:)BlueJayLover123 (talk) 23:55, 27 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free media (Image:KLIV-logo.gif)[edit]

Thanks for uploading Image:KLIV-logo.gif. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 14:08, 3 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion of Takehiro Hasu[edit]

A tag has been placed on Takehiro Hasu requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not indicate the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for biographies.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the article does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that a copy be emailed to you. -- Collectonian (talk · contribs) 05:38, 4 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

RfD nomination of Harry Potter2007[edit]

I have nominated Harry Potter2007 (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) for discussion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at the discussion page. Thank you. — the Man in Question (in question) 01:38, 23 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I have nominated Harry Potter and the Last Horcrux (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) for discussion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at the discussion page. Thank you. — the Man in Question (in question) 01:44, 23 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

RfD nomination of HP^[edit]

I have nominated HP^ (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) for discussion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at the discussion page. Thank you. — the Man in Question (in question) 01:49, 23 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

RfD nomination of HP%[edit]

I have nominated HP% (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) for discussion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at the discussion page. Thank you. — the Man in Question (in question) 01:59, 23 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

RfD nomination of HP$[edit]

I have nominated HP$ (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) for discussion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at the discussion page. Thank you. — the Man in Question (in question) 02:06, 23 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

RfD nomination of HP@[edit]

I have nominated HP@ (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) for discussion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at the discussion page. Thank you. — the Man in Question (in question) 02:08, 23 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

RfD nomination of HP![edit]

I have nominated HP! (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) for discussion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at the discussion page. Thank you. — the Man in Question (in question) 02:10, 23 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Harry's Wife listed at Redirects for discussion[edit]

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Harry's Wife. Since you had some involvement with the Harry's Wife redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion (if you have not already done so). עוד מישהו Od Mishehu 12:51, 21 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Harry's Mom listed at Redirects for discussion[edit]

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Harry's Mom. Since you had some involvement with the Harry's Mom redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. BDD (talk) 01:58, 2 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

首頁 listed at Redirects for discussion[edit]

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect 首頁. Since you had some involvement with the 首頁 redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Steel1943 (talk) 15:14, 6 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hillary Diane listed at Redirects for discussion[edit]

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Hillary Diane. Since you had some involvement with the Hillary Diane redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. BDD (talk) 17:10, 18 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect HP&. Since you had some involvement with the HP& redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. -- Tavix (talk) 15:29, 2 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Miss Rodham listed at Redirects for discussion[edit]

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Miss Rodham. Since you had some involvement with the Miss Rodham redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Godsy(TALKCONT) 22:35, 2 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

MissRodham listed at Redirects for discussion[edit]

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect MissRodham. Since you had some involvement with the MissRodham redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Godsy(TALKCONT) 22:35, 2 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Ms Rodham listed at Redirects for discussion[edit]

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Ms Rodham. Since you had some involvement with the Ms Rodham redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Godsy(TALKCONT) 22:35, 2 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Ms. Rodham listed at Redirects for discussion[edit]

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Ms. Rodham. Since you had some involvement with the Ms. Rodham redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Godsy(TALKCONT) 22:35, 2 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Ms.Rodham listed at Redirects for discussion[edit]

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Ms.Rodham. Since you had some involvement with the Ms.Rodham redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Godsy(TALKCONT) 22:35, 2 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

MsRodham listed at Redirects for discussion[edit]

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect MsRodham. Since you had some involvement with the MsRodham redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Godsy(TALKCONT) 22:36, 2 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

RODHAM listed at Redirects for discussion[edit]

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect RODHAM. Since you had some involvement with the RODHAM redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Godsy(TALKCONT) 04:33, 3 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

September 2007 deaths listed at Redirects for discussion[edit]

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect September 2007 deaths. Since you had some involvement with the September 2007 deaths redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. GeoffreyT2000 (talk) 23:02, 18 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Google\ listed at Redirects for discussion[edit]

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Google\. Since you had some involvement with the Google\ redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. - Champion (talk) (contribs) (Formerly TheChampionMan1234) 02:26, 23 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Google/ listed at Redirects for discussion[edit]

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Google/. Since you had some involvement with the Google/ redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. - Champion (talk) (contribs) (Formerly TheChampionMan1234) 02:26, 23 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Mrs Clinton listed at Redirects for discussion[edit]

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Mrs Clinton. Since you had some involvement with the Mrs Clinton redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. SSTflyer 12:49, 10 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Mrs. Clinton listed at Redirects for discussion[edit]

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Mrs. Clinton. Since you had some involvement with the Mrs. Clinton redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. SSTflyer 12:49, 10 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Ms. Clinton listed at Redirects for discussion[edit]

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Ms. Clinton. Since you had some involvement with the Ms. Clinton redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. SSTflyer 12:49, 10 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

John (Baptist) listed at Redirects for discussion[edit]

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect John (Baptist). Since you had some involvement with the John (Baptist) redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Si Trew (talk) 10:48, 14 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hillary Diane listed at Redirects for discussion[edit]

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Hillary Diane. Since you had some involvement with the Hillary Diane redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. - Champion (talk) (contribs) (Formerly TheChampionMan1234) 06:19, 17 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

HilaryRodhamClinton listed at Redirects for discussion[edit]

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect HilaryRodhamClinton. Since you had some involvement with the HilaryRodhamClinton redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. - Champion (talk) (contribs) (Formerly TheChampionMan1234) 04:16, 18 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hillary-Rodham-Clinton listed at Redirects for discussion[edit]

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Hillary-Rodham-Clinton. Since you had some involvement with the Hillary-Rodham-Clinton redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. - Champion (talk) (contribs) (Formerly TheChampionMan1234) 04:24, 18 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

HillaryRodhamClinton listed at Redirects for discussion[edit]

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect HillaryRodhamClinton. Since you had some involvement with the HillaryRodhamClinton redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. - Champion (talk) (contribs) (Formerly TheChampionMan1234) 04:26, 18 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

RodhamClinton listed at Redirects for discussion[edit]

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect RodhamClinton. Since you had some involvement with the RodhamClinton redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. - CHAMPION (talk) (contributions) (logs) 10:48, 14 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Rodham,Hillary listed at Redirects for discussion[edit]

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Rodham,Hillary. Since you had some involvement with the Rodham,Hillary redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you wish to do so. — the Man in Question (in question) 22:27, 9 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Rodham Hillary listed at Redirects for discussion[edit]

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Rodham Hillary. Since you had some involvement with the Rodham Hillary redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you wish to do so. — the Man in Question (in question) 21:41, 15 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]