User talk:Gelchi

This is Gelchi's talk page, where you can send them messages and comments.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Your submission at Articles for creation: Snazzy (musician) (May 29)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Reading Beans were:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

This submission does not appear to be written in the formal tone expected of an encyclopedia article. Entries should be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources. Please rewrite your submission in a more encyclopedic format. Please make sure to avoid peacock terms that promote the subject.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Snazzy (musician) and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Snazzy (musician), click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Reading Beans ^{Talk to the Beans?} 10:55, 29 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Gelchi! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Reading Beans ^{Talk to the Beans?} 10:55, 29 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Sockpuppet investigation[edit]

You are suspected of sockpuppetry, which means that someone suspects you of using multiple Wikipedia accounts for prohibited purposes. Please make yourself familiar with the guide to responding to investigations, then, if you wish to do so, respond to the evidence at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Snazzymike. Thank you. Reading Beans ^{Talk to the Beans?} 14:10, 29 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry @Reading Beans that is not my account you could identify it with the IP address, i'm really sorry if you think i went wrong please forgive me. Gelchi (talk) 14:19, 29 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Snazzy the Optimist for deletion[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Snazzy the Optimist is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Snazzy the Optimist until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

Reading Beans ^{Talk to the Beans?} 14:19, 29 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Reading Beans Please Sir/Ma, i will really appreciate if you could please mentor me on here because i'm interested in learning more Sir/Ma. Gelchi (talk) 00:22, 31 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I'm Currently blocked because of my disruptive editing which i know what i did was wrong, please help me Sir/Ma. Gelchi (talk) 00:24, 31 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

May 2022[edit]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for persistently making disruptive edits.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Bbb23 (talk) 00:02, 30 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked[edit]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Gelchi (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Hi sir/ma, i'm appealing because i was blocked for making disruptive edits which i clearly admit to. Please sir/ma unblock!! i promise to retract from making disruptive editing or go against the Wikipedia rules, I'm a new user and i enjoy editing please unblock me sir/ma. Gelchi (talk) 02:43, 30 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

I think it's a little too soon, and you didn't talk at all about how you might be a positive contributor if unblocked. — Daniel Case (talk) 06:31, 30 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

UTRS appeal #58928 [edit]

is closed. --Deepfriedokra (talk) 06:18, 30 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked[edit]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Gelchi (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I was blocked from Wikipedia because of my disruptive editing and i totally admit that i didn't abide by the rules governing here because i'm still new on here and have not gotten experiences, i closed a deletion nomination discussion because i taught the consensus for keep has been reached to save the article according to the nominator. I know what i did was wrong because it's totally against wikipedia, i will never go against wikipedia rules again or make disruptive edits again. I promise to undergo a period of mentorship or probation with a well experienced editor advising me and i promise to contribute on here and abide by the rules. Please Unblock Gelchi (talk) 00:15, 31 May 2022 (UTC)}[reply]

Decline reason:

You're a sock puppet of Snazzymike. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 10:32, 31 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Note to administrators: It is likely that this user is a sock. See Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Snazzymike.--Bbb23 (talk) 00:24, 31 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Note to administrators: I have been trying to respond to the investigation but i can't because i'm currently blocked Sir/Ma Gelchi (talk) 00:31, 31 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]