User talk:GORIZARD

License tagging for File:War zone single.jpg[edit]

Thanks for uploading File:War zone single.jpg. You don't seem to have indicated the license status of the image. Wikipedia uses a set of image copyright tags to indicate this information; to add a tag to the image, select the appropriate tag from this list, click on this link, then click "Edit this page" and add the tag to the image's description. If there doesn't seem to be a suitable tag, the image is probably not appropriate for use on Wikipedia.

For help in choosing the correct tag, or for any other questions, leave a message on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 06:06, 13 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File source problem with File:Klaytoninhishome.jpg[edit]

File Copyright problem

Thanks for uploading File:Klaytoninhishome.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, their copyright should also be acknowledged.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Wikipedia:Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 07:19, 19 June 2009 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Peripitus (Talk) 07:19, 19 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File source problem with File:Illnino.jpg[edit]

File Copyright problem

Thanks for uploading File:Illnino.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, their copyright should also be acknowledged.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Wikipedia:Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 07:19, 19 June 2009 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Peripitus (Talk) 07:19, 19 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File source problem with File:Celldwellerfixt.jpg[edit]

File Copyright problem

Thanks for uploading File:Celldwellerfixt.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, their copyright should also be acknowledged.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Wikipedia:Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 07:35, 19 June 2009 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Peripitus (Talk) 07:35, 19 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File source problem with File:Circleofdustband.jpg[edit]

File Copyright problem

Thanks for uploading File:Circleofdustband.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, their copyright should also be acknowledged.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Wikipedia:Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 07:35, 19 June 2009 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Peripitus (Talk) 07:35, 19 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File source problem with File:Angeldust frontmen.jpg[edit]

File Copyright problem

Thanks for uploading File:Angeldust frontmen.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, their copyright should also be acknowledged.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Wikipedia:Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 07:35, 19 June 2009 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Peripitus (Talk) 07:35, 19 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File source problem with File:Crissandklayreunited.jpg[edit]

File Copyright problem

Thanks for uploading File:Crissandklayreunited.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, their copyright should also be acknowledged.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Wikipedia:Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 22:49, 19 June 2009 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Peripitus (Talk) 22:49, 19 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File source problem with File:Angeldustband.jpg[edit]

File Copyright problem

Thanks for uploading File:Angeldustband.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, their copyright should also be acknowledged.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Wikipedia:Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 22:50, 19 June 2009 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Peripitus (Talk) 22:50, 19 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File source problem with File:Liveshow.jpg[edit]

File Copyright problem

Thanks for uploading File:Liveshow.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, their copyright should also be acknowledged.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Wikipedia:Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 22:50, 19 June 2009 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Peripitus (Talk) 22:50, 19 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File copyright problem with File:Switchbacksingle.jpg[edit]

File Copyright problem

Thank you for uploading File:Switchbacksingle.jpg. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the file. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their license and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. Peripitus (Talk) 22:51, 19 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for File:Angeldustband.jpg[edit]

Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:Angeldustband.jpg. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under fair use but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia constitutes fair use. Please go to the file description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. - Jarry1250 ^{[ humourous – discuss ]} 10:50, 28 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Circle Of Dust (album)[edit]

A tag has been placed on Circle Of Dust (album) requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A9 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a musical recording which does not indicate why its subject is important or significant, and where the artist's article has never existed, has been deleted or is eligible for deletion itself. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for music.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. Blanchardb -^{Me•MyEars•MyMouth}- timed 01:48, 12 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File copyright problem with File:System 3 CD.jpg[edit]

File Copyright problem

Thank you for uploading File:System 3 CD.jpg. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the file. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their license and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. FASTILY ^(TALK) 02:37, 12 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File copyright problem with File:CircleofdustdebutCD.jpg[edit]

File Copyright problem

Thank you for uploading File:CircleofdustdebutCD.jpg. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the file. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their license and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. FASTILY ^(TALK) 03:19, 12 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Latin Metal[edit]

The article Latin Metal has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non-notable music genre, questionable verifiability or provenance

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{dated prod}} will stop the Proposed Deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The Speedy Deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and Articles for Deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Stifle (talk) 21:40, 18 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File copyright problem with File:Thedoctor.jpg[edit]

File Copyright problem

Thank you for uploading File:Thedoctor.jpg. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the file. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their license and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. Lәo_(βǃʘʘɱ) 22:02, 9 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Latin Metal[edit]

A tag has been placed on Latin Metal, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G4 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion debate, such as at articles for deletion. Under the specified criteria, where an article has substantially identical content to that of an article deleted after debate, and any changes in the content do not address the reasons for which the material was previously deleted, it may be deleted at any time.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. RadioFan (talk) 13:53, 10 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

September 2009[edit]

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Rambo, did not appear to be constructive and has been reverted. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and read the welcome page to learn more about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. Thank you. --darolew (talk) 04:30, 1 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File source problem with File:Cobracommander.jpg[edit]

File Copyright problem

Thanks for uploading File:Cobracommander.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, their copyright should also be acknowledged.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Wikipedia:Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 16:19, 4 September 2009 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Salavat (talk) 16:19, 4 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image (File:Wish Upon a Blackstar CHPT. 1.jpg)[edit]

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Wish Upon a Blackstar CHPT. 1.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of "file" pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Skier Dude (talk) 03:06, 5 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Blue Stahli[edit]

A tag has been placed on Blue Stahli requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a band or musician, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for musical topics. You may also wish to consider using a Wizard to help you create articles - see the Article Wizard.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. LAA Fan^sign _review 01:47, 10 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File source and copyright licensing problem with File:Cobracommander.jpg[edit]

File Copyright problem

Thanks for uploading File:Cobracommander.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, their copyright should also be acknowledged.

As well as adding the source, we also need to know the terms of the license that the copyright holder has published the file under, usually done by adding a licensing tag. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the {{GFDL-self}} tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair use. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged files may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the file is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Wikipedia:Fair use) then the file will be deleted 48 hours after 03:16, 6 October 2009 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. ww2censor (talk) 03:16, 6 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File copyright problem with File:GameofDeath2FOXDVDcover.jpg[edit]

File Copyright problem

Thank you for uploading File:GameofDeath2FOXDVDcover.jpg. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the file. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their license and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. FASTILY_sock ^(TALK) 00:07, 4 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File copyright problem with File:FistofFuryHongKongposter.jpg[edit]

File Copyright problem

Thank you for uploading File:FistofFuryHongKongposter.jpg. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the file. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their license and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. FASTILY_sock ^(TALK) 00:07, 4 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File copyright problem with File:Thewolfmanemilybluntposter.jpg[edit]

File Copyright problem

Thank you for uploading File:Thewolfmanemilybluntposter.jpg. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the file. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their license and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. FASTILY_sock ^(TALK) 23:15, 6 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File copyright problem with File:Kamen rider 1.jpg[edit]

File Copyright problem

Thank you for uploading File:Kamen rider 1.jpg. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the file. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their license and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. FASTILY_sock ^(TALK) 23:16, 6 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File copyright problem with File:File:The-wolfman.jpg[edit]

File Copyright problem

Thank you for uploading File:File:The-wolfman.jpg. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the file. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their license and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. SoCalSuperEagle (talk) 01:09, 7 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File copyright problem with File:Thewolfman2010officialposter.jpg[edit]

Thank you for uploading File:Thewolfman2010officialposter.jpg. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the file. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their license and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. Skier Dude ► 08:24, 8 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File copyright problem with File:HunterCover.jpg[edit]

Thank you for uploading File:HunterCover.jpg. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the file. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their license and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. Skier Dude (talk) 05:28, 12 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File copyright problem with File:Godzilla1954.jpg[edit]

Thank you for uploading File:Godzilla1954.jpg. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the file. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their license and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. FASTILY_sock ^(TALK) 07:05, 14 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File copyright problem with File:Godzillaoriginal.jpg[edit]

Thank you for uploading File:Godzillaoriginal.jpg. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the file. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their license and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. FASTILY_sock ^(TALK) 07:23, 14 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File copyright problem with File:ThewolfmanU.S.poster.jpg[edit]

Thank you for uploading File:ThewolfmanU.S.poster.jpg. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the file. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their license and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. Skier Dude (talk) 08:25, 29 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Thewolfman2010officialposter.jpg[edit]

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Thewolfman2010officialposter.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of "file" pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Skier Dude (talk) 05:43, 8 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Thewolfman2010officialposter.jpg[edit]

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Thewolfman2010officialposter.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of "file" pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. SchuminWeb (Talk) 12:09, 9 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Garuda (film)[edit]

A tag has been placed on Garuda (film) requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a very short article providing little or no context to the reader. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content. You may wish to consider using a Wizard to help you create articles - see the Article Wizard.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. noq (talk) 19:44, 10 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

March 2010[edit]

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, a number of your recent file uploads, such as File:Predatorsteaser.jpg, have been missing information regarding their copyright status. Please note that Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously and that the copyright status of all media files uploaded to Wikipedia must be verifiable by others. If you have questions regarding copyright on Wikipedia, they can be raised at the copyright question page. Thank you. --IllaZilla (talk) 05:42, 13 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Greetings ... your recent edit to Legendary Pictures has been reverted. While I believe you are working in good faith, Wikipedia is based on facts, not rumors. If you have a reliable source stating that Legendary Pictures will be making a Godzilla movie, please provide that prior to adding the information back to the article. If you have any questions, please feel free to ask on the article's talk page or on my talk page. Thanks, and happy editing! --McDoobAU93 (talk) 23:25, 20 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:War zone single.jpg[edit]

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:War zone single.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

PLEASE NOTE:

I am a bot, and will therefore will not be able to answer your questions.

I will remove the request for deletion if the file is used once again.

If you received this notice after the image is deleted, and you want to restore the image, click here to file an un-delete request.

To opt out of these bot messages, add {{bots|deny=DASHBot}} to somewhere on your talk page.

Thank you. DASHBot (talk) 16:28, 14 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Offcialposter.jpg[edit]

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Offcialposter.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

PLEASE NOTE:

I am a bot, and will therefore not be able to answer your questions.
I will remove the request for deletion if the file is used in an article once again.
If you receive this notice after the image is deleted, and you want to restore the image, click here to file an un-delete request.
To opt out of these bot messages, add {{bots|deny=DASHBot}} to your talk page.
If you believe the bot has made an error, please turn it off here and leave a message on my owner's talk page.

Thank you. DASHBot (talk) 00:20, 13 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Promotionalposter.jpg[edit]

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Promotionalposter.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

PLEASE NOTE:

I am a bot, and will therefore not be able to answer your questions.
I will remove the request for deletion if the file is used in an article once again.
If you receive this notice after the image is deleted, and you want to restore the image, click here to file an un-delete request.
To opt out of these bot messages, add {{bots|deny=DASHBot}} to your talk page.
If you believe the bot has made an error, please turn it off here and leave a message on my owner's talk page.

Thank you. DASHBot (talk) 04:27, 17 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File source problem with File:Cainpapaerback.jpg[edit]

Thanks for uploading File:Cainpapaerback.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, please add a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a brief restatement of that website's terms of use of its content. However, if the copyright holder is a party unaffiliated from the website's publisher, that copyright should also be acknowledged.

If you have uploaded other files, consider verifying that you have specified sources for those files as well. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged per Wikipedia's criteria for speedy deletion, F4. If the image is copyrighted and non-free, the image will be deleted 48 hours after 05:30, 21 April 2010 (UTC) per speedy deletion criterion F7. If you have any questions or are in need of assistance please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Salavat (talk) 05:30, 21 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Cainpapaerback.jpg[edit]

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Cainpapaerback.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of "file" pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Salavat (talk) 05:30, 21 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for File:Rambo3poster.jpg[edit]

Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:Rambo3poster.jpg. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under fair use but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia constitutes fair use. Please go to the file description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. SKATER ^Speak. 22:51, 19 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free media (File:Chapter_02.jpg)[edit]

Thanks for uploading File:Chapter_02.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Melesse (talk) 11:54, 18 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File source and copyright licensing problem with File:GodzillaArtistImpression.jpg[edit]

File Copyright problem

Thanks for uploading File:GodzillaArtistImpression.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, their copyright should also be acknowledged.

As well as adding the source, we also need to know the terms of the license that the copyright holder has published the file under, usually done by adding a licensing tag. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the {{GFDL-self}} tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair use. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log. Unsourced and untagged files may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the file is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Wikipedia:Fair use) then the file will be deleted 48 hours after 16:15, 27 July 2010 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. ww2censor (talk) 16:15, 27 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for File:GodzillaArtistImpression.jpg[edit]

Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:GodzillaArtistImpression.jpg. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under fair use but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia constitutes fair use. Please go to the file description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. ww2censor (talk) 16:16, 27 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File source and copyright licensing problem with File:G film poster.jpg[edit]

File Copyright problem

Thanks for uploading File:G film poster.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, their copyright should also be acknowledged.

As well as adding the source, we also need to know the terms of the license that the copyright holder has published the file under, usually done by adding a licensing tag. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the {{GFDL-self}} tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair use. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log. Unsourced and untagged files may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the file is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Wikipedia:Fair use) then the file will be deleted 48 hours after 08:07, 11 August 2010 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Magog the Ogre (talk) 08:07, 11 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Blackstar (Celldweller)[edit]

The article Blackstar (Celldweller) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non-notable song. Does not meet criteria at WP:NSONG. No evidence of charting or reviews for example. Article has no sources.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{dated prod}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Christopher Connor (talk) 21:01, 12 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Goodbye (Celldweller)[edit]

The article Goodbye (Celldweller) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non-notable song. Does not meet criteria at WP:NSONG. No evidence of charting or reviews for example. Article has no sources.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{dated prod}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Christopher Connor (talk) 21:03, 12 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

ANI notice: 12 August 2010[edit]

Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there currently is a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. See Wikipedia:Administrators'_noticeboard/Incidents#User_talk:GORIZARD_and_image_copyright_problems Christopher Connor (talk) 21:16, 12 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked for 1 month for massive image copyright violations[edit]

You appear not to be heeding multiple warnings given about uploading copyrighted images and using them improperly on Wikipedia. I have imposed a one-month block on your editing Wikipedia.

This block can be undone by any Wikipedia administrator if you read and understand the relevant Wikipedia policies, including non free image use policy and general copyrighted material policy. If you can convince us that you understand those and will abide by them in the future, we'll unblock you sooner.

Georgewilliamherbert (talk) 04:30, 13 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked from editing, for a period of 1 month, for repeated abuse of editing privileges. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make constructive contributions. If you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal the block by adding below this notice the text {{unblock|Your reason here}}, but you should read our guide to appealing blocks first.

Orphaned non-free image File:HunterCover.jpg[edit]

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:HunterCover.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of "file" pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Courcelles 05:35, 8 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Problems with upload of File:Beowulf French poster.jpg[edit]

Thanks for uploading File:Beowulf French poster.jpg. You don't seem to have said where the image came from, who created it, or what the copyright status is. We require this information to verify that the image is legally usable on Wikipedia, and because most image licenses require giving credit to the image's creator.

To add this information, click on this link, then click the "Edit" tab at the top of the page and add the information to the image's description. If you need help, post your question on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 03:30, 11 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Godzilla (2012 film)[edit]

FYI, Godzilla (2012 film) is up for deletion at Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Godzilla_(2012_film)_(2nd_nomination). ʘ alaney2k ʘ (talk) 17:33, 28 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to Wikipedia. We welcome and appreciate your contributions, including your edits to Godzilla (2012 film project), but we cannot accept original research. Original research also encompasses novel, unpublished syntheses of previously published material. Please be prepared to cite a reliable source for all of your information. Thank you. Corvus cornix_talk 00:27, 3 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop claiming that David Callaham is no longer the writer, unless you can provide a reliable source. Corvus cornix_talk 00:35, 3 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Godzilla (2012 film project) is up for deletion again. See Talk:Godzilla (2012 film project). ʘ alaney2k ʘ (talk) 16:39, 24 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Problems with upload of File:Doom movie poster.jpg[edit]

Thanks for uploading File:Doom movie poster.jpg. You don't seem to have said where the image came from, who created it, or provided a license tag. We require this information to verify that the image is legally usable on Wikipedia, and because most image licenses require giving credit to the image's creator.

To add this information, select the appropriate license tag from this list, click on this link, then click the "Edit" tab at the top of the page and add the information to the image's description. If you can't find a suitable license tag, the image is probably not appropriate for use on Wikipedia. If you need help, post your question on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 06:06, 17 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

May 2011[edit]

Please do not add or change content without verifying it by citing reliable sources, as you did to Doom (film). Before making any potentially controversial edits, it is recommended that you discuss them first on the article's talk page. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. -- Doniago (talk) 18:59, 4 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Problems with upload of File:Showdown.jpg[edit]

Thanks for uploading File:Showdown.jpg. You don't seem to have said where the image came from, who created it, or what the copyright status is. We require this information to verify that the image is legally usable on Wikipedia, and because most image licenses require giving credit to the image's creator.

To add this information, click on this link, then click the "Edit" tab at the top of the page and add the information to the image's description. If you need help, post your question on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 11:06, 22 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Problems with upload of File:CircleofDust.jpg[edit]

Thanks for uploading File:CircleofDust.jpg. You don't seem to have said where the image came from, who created it, or what the copyright status is. We require this information to verify that the image is legally usable on Wikipedia, and because most image licenses require giving credit to the image's creator.

To add this information, click on this link, then click the "Edit" tab at the top of the page and add the information to the image's description. If you need help, post your question on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 21:14, 28 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Problems with upload of File:Kanekosugi.jpg[edit]

Thanks for uploading File:Kanekosugi.jpg. You don't seem to have said where the image came from, who created it, or what the copyright status is. We require this information to verify that the image is legally usable on Wikipedia, and because most image licenses require giving credit to the image's creator.

To add this information, click on this link, then click the "Edit" tab at the top of the page and add the information to the image's description. If you need help, post your question on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 12:06, 14 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Problems with upload of File:Donnieyen.jpg[edit]

Thanks for uploading File:Donnieyen.jpg. You don't seem to have said where the image came from, who created it, or what the copyright status is. We require this information to verify that the image is legally usable on Wikipedia, and because most image licenses require giving credit to the image's creator.

To add this information, click on this link, then click the "Edit" tab at the top of the page and add the information to the image's description. If you need help, post your question on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 00:06, 17 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of David Callaham[edit]

The article David Callaham has been proposed for deletion because, under Wikipedia policy, all biographies of living persons created after March 18, 2010, must have at least one reliable source that directly supports material in the article. The nominator also raised the following concern:

All biographies of living people created after March 18, 2010, must have references.

If you created the article, please don't take offense. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners, or ask at the help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the {{prod blp}} tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within ten days, the article may be deleted, but you can request that it be undeleted when you are ready to add one. SwisterTwister talk 04:48, 26 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Problems with upload of File:Mothra3poster.jpg[edit]

Thanks for uploading File:Mothra3poster.jpg. You don't seem to have said where the image came from, who created it, or what the copyright status is. We require this information to verify that the image is legally usable on Wikipedia, and because most image licenses require giving credit to the image's creator.

To add this information, click on this link, then click the "Edit" tab at the top of the page and add the information to the image's description. If you need help, post your question on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 08:06, 28 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Problems with upload of File:Mothra2poster.jpg[edit]

Thanks for uploading File:Mothra2poster.jpg. You don't seem to have said where the image came from, who created it, or what the copyright status is. We require this information to verify that the image is legally usable on Wikipedia, and because most image licenses require giving credit to the image's creator.

To add this information, click on this link, then click the "Edit" tab at the top of the page and add the information to the image's description. If you need help, post your question on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 08:06, 28 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Problems with upload of File:Rebirthofmothraposter.jpg[edit]

Thanks for uploading File:Rebirthofmothraposter.jpg. You don't seem to have said where the image came from, who created it, or what the copyright status is. We require this information to verify that the image is legally usable on Wikipedia, and because most image licenses require giving credit to the image's creator.

To add this information, click on this link, then click the "Edit" tab at the top of the page and add the information to the image's description. If you need help, post your question on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 08:07, 28 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Problems with upload of File:GappaJapaneseposter.jpg[edit]

Thanks for uploading File:GappaJapaneseposter.jpg. You don't seem to have said where the image came from, who created it, or what the copyright status is. We require this information to verify that the image is legally usable on Wikipedia, and because most image licenses require giving credit to the image's creator.

To add this information, click on this link, then click the "Edit" tab at the top of the page and add the information to the image's description. If you need help, post your question on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 10:08, 30 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Problems with upload of File:Hunter.jpg[edit]

Thanks for uploading File:Hunter.jpg. You don't seem to have said where the image came from, who created it, or what the copyright status is. We require this information to verify that the image is legally usable on Wikipedia, and because most image licenses require giving credit to the image's creator.

To add this information, click on this link, then click the "Edit" tab at the top of the page and add the information to the image's description. If you need help, post your question on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 06:09, 9 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Godzilla 1998 film[edit]

Please do not add or change content without verifying it by citing reliable sources, as you did to the Godzilla (1998 film) references to the article. Thank you. -- DeWaine (talk) 23:50, 8 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

License tagging for File:Teaser Poster.jpg[edit]

Thanks for uploading File:Teaser Poster.jpg. You don't seem to have indicated the license status of the image. Wikipedia uses a set of image copyright tags to indicate this information; to add a tag to the image, select the appropriate tag from this list, click on this link, then click the "Edit" tab at the top of the page and add the tag to the image's description. If there doesn't seem to be a suitable tag, the image is probably not appropriate for use on Wikipedia.

For help in choosing the correct tag, or for any other questions, leave a message on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 20:05, 15 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification[edit]

Hi. When you recently edited Shusuke Kaneko, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Director (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:59, 12 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification[edit]

Hi. When you recently edited Guyver: Dark Hero, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Jack Armstrong and American (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:17, 28 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for March 6[edit]

Hi. When you recently edited The Guyver, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Jack Armstrong (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:25, 6 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for March 18[edit]

Hi. When you recently edited The Expendables 2, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Rated R (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:23, 18 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Battle of the Damned[edit]

The article Battle of the Damned has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Subject lacks notability per WP:TOOSOON, only coverage seems to be in descriptive press releases

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Smcg8374 (talk) 06:38, 10 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Battle of the Damned for deletion[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Battle of the Damned is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Battle of the Damned until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Smcg8374 (talk) 01:07, 17 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of File:Universal Soldiers Regeneration US DVD cover.jpg[edit]

A tag has been placed on File:Universal Soldiers Regeneration US DVD cover.jpg requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section F1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the image is an unused redundant copy (all pixels the same or scaled down) of an image in the same file format, which is on Wikipedia (not on Commons), and all inward links have been updated.

If you think that the page was nominated in error, contest the nomination by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion" in the speedy deletion tag. Doing so will take you to the talk page where you can explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but do not hesitate to add information that is consistent with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Mephistophelian (talk) 07:35, 1 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of No One Lives[edit]

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on No One Lives requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is an article with no content whatsoever, or whose contents consist only of external links, a "See also" section, book references, category tags, template tags, interwiki links, a rephrasing of the title, or an attempt to contact the subject of the article. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

If you think that the page was nominated in error, contest the nomination by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion" in the speedy deletion tag. Doing so will take you to the talk page where you can explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but do not hesitate to add information that is consistent with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. Tinton5 (talk) 01:53, 10 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Removing Speedy at No One Lives[edit]

Hi GORIZARD, you recently removed a deletion tag from No One Lives. Because Wikipedia policy does not allow the creator of the page to remove speedy deletion tags, an automated program has replaced the tag. Although the deletion proposal may be incorrect, removing the tag is not the correct way for you to contest the deletion, even if you are more experienced than the nominator. Instead, please use the talk page to explain why the page should not be deleted. Remember to be patient, there is no harm in waiting for another experienced user to review the deletion and judge what the right course of action is. As you are involved, and therefore potentially biased, you should refrain from doing this yourself. Thank you, - SDPatrolBot (talk) 02:03, 10 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for September 10[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited No One Lives, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages David Cohen and Luke Evans (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:58, 10 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free media (File:Universal Soldiers Day of Reckoning official poster.jpg)[edit]

Thanks for uploading File:Universal Soldiers Day of Reckoning official poster.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Hazard-Bot (talk) 04:39, 14 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free media (File:Universal Soldier Regeneration US DVD cover.jpg)[edit]

Thanks for uploading File:Universal Soldier Regeneration US DVD cover.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Hazard-Bot (talk) 05:18, 25 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Godzilla, King of the Monsters![edit]

King of the Monsters! was an American production, not a Toho production. We should keep listing it in American films on the Godzilla franchise page. Alaney2k (talk) 16:39, 27 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Godzilla 1998 film[edit]

Please do not add or change content without verifying it by citing reliable sources. Thank you. -- TurokSwe (talk) 08:32, 14 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

March 2013[edit]

Hello, I'm AdventurousSquirrel. I noticed that you recently removed some content from Godzilla (1998 film) without explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry: I restored the removed content. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks! AdventurousSquirrel (talk) 07:53, 14 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Godzilla 1998 film[edit]

I would advice you to stop removing the content on the page Godzilla (1998 film). This can be seen as vandalism. Please do not add, change or remove content without verifying it by citing reliable sources or giving motivations and explanations why. Thank you! -- TurokSwe (talk) 09:10, 14 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Godzilla 1998 film[edit]

Warning! Stop removing the content on the page Godzilla (1998 film). This can be seen as vandalism. Please do not add, change or remove content without verifying it by citing reliable sources or giving motivations and explanations why. Thank you! -- TurokSwe (talk) 09:22, 14 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Godzilla 1998 film and Zilla[edit]

Warning! Emediately stop removing the content on the pages Godzilla (1998 film) and Zilla. This can be seen as vandalism. Please do not add, change or remove content without verifying it by citing reliable sources or giving motivations and explanations why. Thank you! -- TurokSwe (talk) 10:35, 14 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Godzilla 1998 film and Zilla[edit]

Warning! Emediately stop removing the content on the pages Godzilla (1998 film) and Zilla. This can be seen as vandalism. Please do not add, change or remove content without verifying it by citing reliable sources or giving motivations and explanations why. Thank you! -- TurokSwe (talk) 10:45, 14 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Godzilla 1998 film and Zilla[edit]

You have have got several warnings and has now been reported because of continuous removal of content on the pages Godzilla (1998 film) and Zilla. This can be seen as vandalism. Please do not add, change or remove content without verifying it by citing reliable sources or giving motivations and explanations why. Thank you! -- TurokSwe (talk) 11:05, 14 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abuse of editing privileges. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding below this notice the text {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first.

Materialscientist (talk) 10:07, 14 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free media (File:Zilla Official Trademark Logo & Registration.jpg)[edit]

Thanks for uploading File:Zilla Official Trademark Logo & Registration.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Hazard-Bot (talk) 04:30, 15 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Block notices[edit]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

GORIZARD (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I've been WRONGFULLY accused & blocked for "vandalism" by a user called TurokSwe. I made revisions to the pages Godzilla (1998) and Zilla and had reliable sources to back up my edits but this user, TurokSwe, DID NOT personally like what I contributed. He had me blocked for "vandalizing". Wikipedia CLEARLY STATES examples of vandalism include "adding irrelevant obscenities & crude humor to a page, illegitimately blanking pages, & inserting obvious nonsense into a page." NONE of which match what I've done. TurokSwe did not like what I had to contribute and took it upon himself to block me. He even THREATENED me not to add, remove, or make any further edits to the pages. He clearly said to me "I am warning you...", which I consider to be a threat. TurokSwe is going against Wikipedia guidelines. He's REFUSING to let anyone edit these pages and is MONOPOLIZING them to prevent future edits. I deserve to be unblocked because I have done nothing wrong. The only thing I've done was contribute my help to two wikipedia pages that are being monopolized by this single user. I even had facts to support my edits but TurokSwe had be blocked before I could add them. Please, do not let this injustice be tolerated. Please, appeal to my block and make an example of this user abusing his privileges.

Decline reason:

Please discuss your own actions, not those of the other users. You're not blocked for vandalism (although your actions were close to it), you're blocked for disruptive editing by repeatedly reverting two articles, removing referenced content without explanation. Max Semenik (talk) 07:34, 19 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

GORIZARD (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I've been blocked for "disruptive editing" and I have acknowledged the consequences of my actions. I will refrain from editing from the pages Godzilla (1998) and Zilla or contribute "disruptive editing" from here on end. I apologize.

Decline reason:

Not good enough. Please tell us why you felt the need to make repetitive vandalism edits, and what you now plan on editing if you stay away from the articles you have been vandalising. --Anthony Bradbury^"talk" 22:01, 19 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

I've restored the declined warnings: you're not allowed to remove them while you're blocked. Further rempovals will result in your right to edit this page to be revoked. Max Semenik (talk) 23:54, 19 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

It is unfortunate that you removed the declined warnings (now replaced), but I could accept that your action in doing so was due to inexperience. I would accept your answer to my question in your last unblock, but will defer to another admin to make the decision. If you achieve unblock seek consensus on talk pages if there is a content dispute. --Anthony Bradbury^"talk" 10:21, 20 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

GORIZARD (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I have realized the consequences of my actions. The reason I made revisions to the pages Godzilla (1998) and Zilla is because I was trying to correct some inaccuracies that didn't have sufficient reliable sources (only self concluded opinions) to support them and those inaccuracies are still present on both pages. I repeatedly brought back up my revisions when they were removed because I was attempting to complete them but I was blocked before I could finish. All I wish to do is correct the errors on both pages billed with unreliable sources and repeatedly bringing back up my revisions was a mistake on my part. I have learned the errors of my actions. I will refrain from editing both pages from here on end and examine what I edit and revise on wikipedia. Thank you for your time. GORIZARD (talk) 01:29, 21 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

When I went to go check the history of Godzilla (1998 film), to see what types of edits you were making before, I saw that the most recent edit was by User:GORIZARD2, obviously also your account. Blocked means blocked, it does not mean that you can edit from an alternate account. If you wish to be unblocked, you need to request an unblock from here. At this point, since you've clearly not learned anything from the previous blocks, I don't see why this one should be granted. One thing that might possibly help you get unblocked at some point in the future would be if you, right now, declare any other accounts that you have. Qwyrxian (talk) 05:22, 28 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Yes. That account is also owned by me. I declare it. I used that account to further edit because the admins were taking too long to review my appeal. Wikipedia guidelines stated it would take several hours to review my request. It's been nearly a week and half.

Yeah, well, as I said, blocked means blocked. It means you, the person, cannot edit. Not under another account (new or old), and not as an IP. You may not edit so long as you are blocked. You may only edit if and when an admin accepts your unblock request. And since you deliberately edited around the block, that's now made it far less likely that you'll be unblocked any time in the near future. Especially since it proves you were lying above: you said if unblocked you would not edit Godzilla (1978 film), and that was one of the articles you edited with the other account. Qwyrxian (talk) 09:48, 28 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

That's a bit wrong on two accounts. Yes, I did return to the Godzilla (1998 film) page but I DID NOT EDIT ANYTHING from the article page. I simply directed myself to the TALK PAGE and submitted an editing request to remove and add things on the article. I even provided a link to vouch the facts I was hoping to add to the page's Accolades section but I did not edit anything from the actual page itself and what I meant from what I said that "I learned my lesson" was that I would refrain from further "disruptive editing", I doubt anything I did qualifies as disruptive editing. I should have made myself clearer on that but none the less, I did not actually violate my own agreement because I didn't actually edit anything from said page's article.

To quote you, in the unblock notice above: "I will refrain from editing from the pages Godzilla (1998) and Zilla or contribute "disruptive editing" from here on end." You unambiguously broke the first part of that sentence. I'm not saying that what you did is disruptive, but that 1) you socked to get around a block, making you untrustworthy, and 2) did the opposite of what you promised to do in an earlier unblock request. So, you can try another unblock request if you want, and see what another admin says (I wouldn't review another unblock request myself). But you might be better off simply leaving the project for a while (the standard offer is six months) and then come back and try again. But it's up to you. Qwyrxian (talk) 08:27, 29 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Metamorphosis COD.jpg[edit]

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Metamorphosis COD.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:39, 22 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:System1.jpg[edit]

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:System1.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:32, 27 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:System 3 CD.jpg[edit]

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:System 3 CD.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:33, 27 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:System 2.jpg[edit]

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:System 2.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:34, 27 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Doom movie poster.jpg[edit]

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Doom movie poster.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:33, 16 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of The Lucky One (Celldweller song)[edit]

The article The Lucky One (Celldweller song) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Does not meet WP:NSONG

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Jmertel23 (talk) 16:30, 11 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Godzilla March[edit]

The article Godzilla March has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Unsourced for 10 years now and I could not find any credible sources. Propose deletion or perhaps a merge into Akira Ifukube

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

This bot DID NOT nominate any of your contributions for deletion; please refer to the history of each individual page for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 10:01, 25 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]