User talk:GA1015

January 2020[edit]

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Nasi goreng; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus, rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.

Points to note:

Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made;
Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes and work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. Austronesier (talk) 19:49, 1 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@Austronesier: I do not edit war, try to note who started it and tried to change the page edit. Nasi goreng GA1015 (talk) 21:00, 1 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@GA1015: You are edit warring (see WP:Edit warring). Not only that, you are removing sourced content (regardless whether it is a new addition or not) with meaningless summaries like "fix", "improve the page", "again vandalism" (this violates WP:AGF), when the other editor re-inserted the sourced content. Please take your issue to the talk page first, and back it up with reliable sources. –Austronesier (talk) 21:19, 1 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@GA1015: See also WP:3RR. Also on Wikipedia, vandalism has a very specific meaning: editing (or other behavior) deliberately intended to obstruct or defeat the project's purpose. Ckfasdf (talk) 04:20, 2 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]