User talk:G. Picanço

November 2020[edit]

Hello, I'm Materialscientist. I noticed that in this edit to The Rattlesnakes (1955 band), you removed content without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry, the removed content has been restored. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Materialscientist (talk) 16:53, 17 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not add or change content, as you did at Bee Gees, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Have you read the hidden note? Discuss the band's origin with other editors. Enjoyer of World^💬 22:19, 17 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Bee Gees, you may be blocked from editing. - Arjayay (talk) 11:08, 18 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Bee Gees. - Arjayay (talk) 11:12, 18 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

According to the website The Bee Gees: How Three Small-Town Brothers Became Leaders of the 70s and 80s Music Scene, on Biography, their origins are on Redcliffe, Australia. G. Picanço (talk) 19:11, 30 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, G. Picanço, welcome to Wikipedia and thank you for your contributions. Your editing pattern indicates that you may be using multiple accounts or coordinating editing with people outside Wikipedia, such as 200.6.143.161 (talk · contribs). Our policy on multiple accounts usually does not allow this, and users who misuse multiple accounts may be blocked from editing. If you operate multiple accounts directly or with the help of another person, please disclose these connections. Thank you. - Arjayay (talk) 19:24, 30 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

In this case, I was using only one account. G. Picanço (talk) 19:27, 30 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

December 2020[edit]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Bee Gees. - Arjayay (talk) 16:07, 5 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Youngs[edit]

The only thing that belongs in the lead sentence is a person's citizenship, nothing else. Birthplace, ethnicity and anything else is to be dealt with later in the article. This is the Wikipedia guideline, so if you want to change that policy, head over to Wikipedia talk:Manual of Style/Biography and start a discussion there. Cheers, Bretonbanquet (talk) 19:10, 5 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from adding, removing or changing genres, as you did to The Beatles discography, without providing a source or establishing a consensus on the article's talk page first. Genre changes to suit your own point of view are considered disruptive. Thank you. Sundayclose (talk) 20:18, 5 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deceptive edit summaries[edit]

Stop leaving deceptive edit summaries, as you did here It is a form of vandalism. If you continue you could lose your editing privileges. Sundayclose (talk) 20:35, 5 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Everytime I get a consensus for it, they remove it. G. Picanço (talk) 20:54, 5 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

First of all, there is no consensus for the edit you're trying to make. Secondly, how does that justify your vandalism of leaving lies in edit summaries? Sundayclose (talk) 23:40, 5 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

December 2020[edit]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for disruptively rejecting other users' concerns by making the same type of edit again and again.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. ~ ToBeFree (talk) 00:00, 6 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

January 2021[edit]

Wikipedia's technical logs indicate that this user account has been or may be used abusively. It has been blocked indefinitely from editing to prevent abuse.

Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted.
If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you should review the guide to appealing blocks, and then appeal your block by adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}}. Note that anything you post in your unblock request will be public, so you may alternatively use the Unblock Ticket Request System to submit an appeal if it contains information that must be private.

Administrators: Checkusers have access to confidential system logs not accessible by the public or by administrators due to the Wikimedia Foundation's privacy policy. You must not loosen or remove this block, or issue an IP block exemption, without consulting with a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee. Administrators who undo checkuser blocks without permission from a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee may be summarily desysopped.

Drmies (talk) 16:31, 17 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]