User talk:FosseTheCat

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Welcome!

Hello, FosseTheCat, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Where to ask a question, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome!  TMS63112 17:20, 24 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Redirects[edit]

For some alternate spellings of Frontrunners, you created pages with the content "See Frontrunners". The best way to do that is to write

#REDIRECT [[Frontrunners]]

as the only content of that page: if you go to a page with that content, you automatically end up at Frontrunners. See Front Runners or FrontRunners, where this has been done. (For more information on this, see WP:R). Happy editing, Kusma (討論) 23:34, 24 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Coalition for Economic Survival[edit]

I noticed you re added Coalition for Economic Survival to the CES Disambiguation Page. I had removed it from the list for a reason after I consulted the appropriate policy pages. Please understand I did not just remove them. In the future please check the Page history's Edit summary or see the Talk page before re-adding content other people removed. I had explained why I removed it on the talk page Talk:CES#Coalition_for_Economic_Survival. Please Defend your re addition of Coalition for Economic Survival to the list or remove it.

Please either Explain why you read added it, remove it or write a Stub article about the organization. After you create the article you can fix the redirect for Coalition of Economic Survival because their only needs to be one article about it. Happy Editing--E-Bod 20:36, 28 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Original Research[edit]

Please stop adding unsourced statements to articles about West Hollywood and the Sunset Strip. Some of the information you've added is incorrect. Particularly, the current location of the Viper Room was never the location of the London Fog. The London Fog was located where Duke's Coffee Shop is now, adjacent to the Whisky (8909 W. Sunset). Many, many sources are clear on this (e.g. "Sunset Strip As Memory Lane"). It was used as a filming location for "London Fog" in the movie The Doors, but that's the extent of the connection. Also, London Fog (nightclub) should not be a redirect to Viper Room. Please discuss on Talk:Viper Room if you are interested. Mike Dillon 02:10, 13 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

My apologies for fingering you for the Viper Room changes. I confused you with another editor because I had seen you add a bunch of unsourced stuff to the Sunset Strip article itself. However, please read the reference about citing sources, despite my error. Mike Dillon 02:14, 13 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Frontrunners‎[edit]

Regarding Frontrunners, our WP:MOS specificies very limited use of bold formatting, really just for the first use of the article title in the text. -Will Beback 22:41, 3 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Image tagging for Image:Arnold.01.jpg[edit]

Thanks for uploading Image:Arnold.01.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the source and creator of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the source and creator of the image on the image's description page, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided source information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 09:07, 25 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Image tagging for Image:Casablanca_Valley_of_the_Dolls.jpg[edit]

Thanks for uploading Image:Casablanca_Valley_of_the_Dolls.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the source and creator of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the source and creator of the image on the image's description page, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided source information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 08:20, 27 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Image tagging for Image:2812371443.jpg[edit]

Thanks for uploading Image:2812371443.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the source and creator of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the source and creator of the image on the image's description page, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided source information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 16:05, 3 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]


Image:Parkins Valley.jpg listed for deletion[edit]

An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, Image:Parkins Valley.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Images and media for deletion. Please look there to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in its not being deleted. Thank you. —Gay Cdn (talk) (Contr.) 01:51, 19 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Your edit to Patrick Sammon[edit]

Your recent edit to Patrick Sammon (diff) was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to recognize and repair vandalism to Wikipedia articles. If the bot reverted a legitimate edit, please accept my humble creator's apologies – if you bring it to the attention of the bot's owner, we may be able to improve its behavior. Click here for frequently asked questions about the bot and this warning. // AntiVandalBot 17:04, 18 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion tags[edit]

Please do not remove speedy deletion tags from articles that you have created yourself. If you do not believe the article deserves to be deleted, then please do the following:

  1. Place {{hangon}} on the page. Please do not remove any existing speedy deletion tag(s).
  2. Make your case on the article's talk page.

Administrators will look at your reasoning before deciding what to do with the article. Thank you. LittleOldMe 17:26, 18 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Log Cabin Republicans[edit]

Hi there -- you first added content that makes up a section to the Log Cabin Republicans page which has many weasel words and appears to be entirely unsourced (as per WP:POV and WP:VER). On the talk page of the article I have noted that it should be deleted unless it conforms to these official policies of Wikipedia. But I will hold back for a bit if you'd like a chance to clean it up, source it properly and not include your own analysis or opinion of the original material you are referencing. Thanks for working to improve the article. (p.s. you might want to start your User Page) NYDCSP 22:48, 1 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Invitation to join WP:LGBT[edit]

Not sure if you're interested, but you might want to take a look at the LGBT WikiProject. If you are interested, sign up! Thanks :) -- SatyrTN (talk | contribs) 17:20, 13 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Log Cabin Republicans[edit]

The article Log Cabin Republicans received heavy editing today by unregistered users, which I noticed at WikiRage.com. The article may benefit from a good review. According to Wikipedia Page History Statistics, you are one of the top contributors to that page. If you have the time, would you please read over the article and make any necessary changes. Thanks. -- Jreferee (Talk) 06:57, 13 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

AfD nomination of Sunset Marquis Whisky Bar[edit]

Sunset Marquis Whisky Bar, an article you created, has been nominated for deletion. We appreciate your contributions. However, an editor does not feel that Sunset Marquis Whisky Bar satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion and has explained why in the nomination space (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and the Wikipedia deletion policy). Your opinions on the matter are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sunset Marquis Whisky Bar and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~). You are free to edit the content of Sunset Marquis Whisky Bar during the discussion but should not remove the articles for deletion template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you. Espresso Addict (talk) 04:59, 21 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image:2812371443A.jpg listed for deletion[edit]

An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, Image:2812371443A.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Images and media for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Nv8200p talk 12:18, 9 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I thought you might like to know that Ronald Reagan penned an editorial in the Los Angeles Herald-Exaiminer, p. A19 on November 1st 1978 that was, in part, about the Briggs Initiative. - Enuja (talk) 23:27, 7 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The article Alta Loma Road has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

No sources and little-to-no content

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. pbp 15:21, 13 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on Christopher Street West, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done for the following reason:

Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not meet basic Wikipedia criteria may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, you can place a request here. – Recollected 16:51, 16 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Notification of automated file description generation[edit]

Your upload of File:Arnold Schwarzenegger speaks to the Log Cabin Republicans (June 29 2006).jpg or contribution to its description is noted, and thanks (even if belatedly) for your contribution. In order to help make better use of the media, an attempt has been made by an automated process to identify and add certain information to the media's description page.

This notification is placed on your talk page because a bot has identified you either as the uploader of the file, or as a contributor to its metadata. It would be appreciated if you could carefully review the information the bot added. To opt out of these notifications, please follow the instructions here. Thanks! Message delivered by Theo's Little Bot (opt-out) 12:15, 4 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:38, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]