User talk:FluffyPinkDude

FluffyPinkDude, you are invited to the Teahouse![edit]

Hi FluffyPinkDude! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia.
Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from experienced editors like Blaze The Wolf (talk).

Visit the Teahouse

We hope to see you there!

Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts

16:01, 23 November 2021 (UTC)

Your edit at Narcotics Control Bureau[edit]

Hi, you just undid my edit on Narcotics Control Bureau where I had removed the controversy section. You need to understand that NCB is a national agency and the matter put in the section is obscure, minuscule, and does not provide the other side of the story. Finally, the matter is not notable enough in my opinion to put in controversy section, if anything it should be put in an "allegations" section if there is one. I am undoing your edit. I request you to see WP:CONTROVERSIALFACT and other articles similar to NCB to get an idea. If you want to undo revision again, you should start a talk on Talk:Narcotics Control Bureau. Thank you, User4edits (talk) 05:59, 4 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Terrorism in Pakistan[edit]

Hello friend, it seems to me that, as the cited source says the evidence is clear and proves what it alleges, you will need to provide a source yourself if you want to say it's just an allegation. Best regards, George Custer's Sabre (talk) 08:05, 23 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

AfC notification: Draft:MicroPublication Biology has a new comment[edit]

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:MicroPublication Biology. Thanks! Robert McClenon (talk) 15:57, 16 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: MicroPublication Biology (February 16)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Velella was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject. Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:MicroPublication Biology and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:MicroPublication Biology, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Velella ^{Velella Talk} 23:08, 16 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your thread has been archived[edit]

Hi FluffyPinkDude! The thread you created at the Wikipedia:Teahouse, Improving the new article I created, has been archived because there was no discussion for a few days.

You can still read the archived discussion. If you have follow-up questions, please create a new thread.

See also the help page about the archival process. The archival was done by Lowercase sigmabot III, and this notification was delivered by Muninnbot, both automated accounts. You can opt out of future notifications by placing {{bots|deny=Muninnbot}} on top of the current page (your user talk page). Muninnbot (talk) 19:02, 20 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:MicroPublication Biology[edit]

Hello, FluffyPinkDude. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:MicroPublication Biology, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 14:02, 6 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:MicroPublication Biology[edit]

Hello, FluffyPinkDude. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or draft page you started, "MicroPublication Biology".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! Hey man im josh (talk) 13:43, 6 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]