User talk:Florida babe

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Welcome[edit]

Hello, Florida babe! Welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. You may benefit from following some of the links below, which will help you get the most out of Wikipedia. If you have any questions you can ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking or by typing four tildes "~~~~"; this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you are already loving Wikipedia you might want to consider being "adopted" by a more experienced editor or joining a WikiProject to collaborate with others in creating and improving articles of your interest. Click here for a directory of all the WikiProjects. Finally, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field. Happy editing! Erik the Red 2 (Ave Caesar) 23:13, 27 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Getting Started
Getting Help
Policies and Guidelines

The Community
Things to do
Miscellaneous

Speedy deletion of "Rachel elizabeth dare"[edit]

A page you created, Rachel elizabeth dare, has been tagged for deletion in accordance with our deletion policy. In particular, it meets one or more criteria for speedy deletion; the relevant criterion is:

Patent nonsense and gibberish, an unsalvageably incoherent page with no meaningful content.

You are welcome to contribute content which complies with our content policies and any applicable inclusion guidelines. However, please do not simply re-create the page with the same content. You may also wish to read our introduction to editing and guide to writing your first article.

If you have any questions, please contact an administrator for assistance. Thank you —  scetoaux (T|C) 01:19, 7 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

May 2008[edit]

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to The Battle of the Labyrinth, did not appear to be constructive and has been automatically reverted by ClueBot. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. If you believe there has been a mistake and would like to report a false positive, please report it here and then remove this warning from your talk page. If your edit was not vandalism, please feel free to make your edit again after reporting it. The following is the log entry regarding this warning: The Battle of the Labyrinth was changed by Florida babe (u) (t) making a minor change adding "!!!" on 2008-05-07T22:54:21+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot (talk) 22:54, 7 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Possibly unfree Image:Taylor swift 3.jpg[edit]

An image that you uploaded or altered, Image:Taylor swift 3.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree images because its copyright status is disputed. If the image's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the image description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Nabudis Shadow (talk) 10:30, 11 May 2008 (UTC) --Nabudis Shadow (talk) 10:30, 11 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Possibly unfree Image:Taylor swift 2.jpg[edit]

An image that you uploaded or altered, Image:Taylor swift 2.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree images because its copyright status is disputed. If the image's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the image description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Nabudis Shadow (talk) 10:31, 11 May 2008 (UTC) --Nabudis Shadow (talk) 10:31, 11 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, the recent edit you made to The Sea of Monsters has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thanks. Thingg 20:17, 11 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The recent edit you made to The Sea of Monsters constitutes vandalism, and has been reverted. Please do not continue to vandalize pages; use the sandbox for testing. Thanks. J.delanoygabsadds 20:19, 11 May 2008 (UTC))[reply]

Please do not vandalize pages, as you did with this edit to The Sea of Monsters. If you continue to do so, you will be blocked from editing. Thingg 20:21, 11 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

This is your last warning. You will be blocked from editing the next time you vandalize a page, as you did with this edit to The Sea of Monsters. Ottawa4ever (talk) 20:23, 11 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 48 hours in accordance with Wikipedia's blocking policy for abuse of editing privileges. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make constructive contributions. If you believe this block is unjustified, you may contest the block by adding the text {{unblock|your reason here}} below. Hut 8.5 20:32, 11 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image copyright problem with Image:Battle l.jpg[edit]

Image Copyright problem
Image Copyright problem

Thank you for uploading Image:Battle l.jpg. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the image. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. Sdrtirs (talk) 05:39, 15 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image copyright problem with Image:Lightning thief.jpg[edit]

Image Copyright problem
Image Copyright problem

Thank you for uploading Image:Lightning thief.jpg. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the image. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. Sdrtirs (talk) 05:40, 15 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for experimenting with Wikipedia. Your image was inserted successfully into The Lightning Thief, and has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you want to do. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. Thank you. Please refrain from adding any more "Picture" sections to the Percy Jackson articles, as Wikipedia is not where they belong. Erik the Red 2 (AVE·CAESAR) 22:58, 16 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion of Image:Taylor swift 3.jpg[edit]

A tag has been placed on Image:Taylor swift 3.jpg requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section I6 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a non-free image with no fair use rationale uploaded after May 4, 2006 which has been tagged as not having a rationale for more than 7 days.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on [[ Talk:Image:Taylor swift 3.jpg|the talk page]] explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Nabudis Shadow (talk) 05:20, 18 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

This is another invalid speedy deletion due to mistagging. Jesse Viviano (talk) 16:20, 18 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion of Image:Taylor swift 2.jpg[edit]

A tag has been placed on Image:Taylor swift 2.jpg requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section I6 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a non-free image with no fair use rationale uploaded after May 4, 2006 which has been tagged as not having a rationale for more than 7 days.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on [[ Talk:Image:Taylor swift 2.jpg|the talk page]] explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Nabudis Shadow (talk) 05:20, 18 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

This speedy deletion is invalid, because the image itself was not tagged correctly. I have tagged it correctly, and it will be deleted in seven days unless the image is properly sourced and licensed. Jesse Viviano (talk) 16:18, 18 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image copyright problem with Image:Taylor swift 2.jpg[edit]

Image Copyright problem
Image Copyright problem

Thank you for uploading Image:Taylor swift 2.jpg. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the image. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. Jesse Viviano (talk) 16:18, 18 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image copyright problem with Image:Taylor swift 3.jpg[edit]

Image Copyright problem
Image Copyright problem

Thank you for uploading Image:Taylor swift 3.jpg. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the image. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. Jesse Viviano (talk) 16:20, 18 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Unspecified source and copyright for Image:K 12.jpg[edit]

Thanks for uploading Image:K 12.jpg. I notice the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you have not created this file yourself, then there needs to be a justification explaining why we have the right to use it on Wikipedia (see copyright tagging below). If you did not create the file yourself, then you need to specify where it was found, i.e., in most cases link to the website where it was taken from, and the terms of use for content from that page.

The file also doesn't have a copyright tag, so one must be added. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the {{GFDL-self}} tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Fair use, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair use. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Wikipedia:Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 23:03, 18 May 2008 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Corvus cornixtalk 23:03, 18 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Unspecified source and copyright for Image:I 52.jpg[edit]

Thanks for uploading Image:I 52.jpg. I notice the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you have not created this file yourself, then there needs to be a justification explaining why we have the right to use it on Wikipedia (see copyright tagging below). If you did not create the file yourself, then you need to specify where it was found, i.e., in most cases link to the website where it was taken from, and the terms of use for content from that page.

The file also doesn't have a copyright tag, so one must be added. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the {{GFDL-self}} tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Fair use, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair use. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Wikipedia:Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 23:04, 18 May 2008 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Corvus cornixtalk 23:04, 18 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Unspecified source and copyright for Image:J 85.jpg[edit]

Thanks for uploading Image:J 85.jpg. I notice the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you have not created this file yourself, then there needs to be a justification explaining why we have the right to use it on Wikipedia (see copyright tagging below). If you did not create the file yourself, then you need to specify where it was found, i.e., in most cases link to the website where it was taken from, and the terms of use for content from that page.

The file also doesn't have a copyright tag, so one must be added. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the {{GFDL-self}} tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Fair use, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair use. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Wikipedia:Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 23:05, 18 May 2008 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Corvus cornixtalk 23:05, 18 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Unspecified source and copyright for Image:Hola 85.jpg[edit]

Thanks for uploading Image:Hola 85.jpg. I notice the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you have not created this file yourself, then there needs to be a justification explaining why we have the right to use it on Wikipedia (see copyright tagging below). If you did not create the file yourself, then you need to specify where it was found, i.e., in most cases link to the website where it was taken from, and the terms of use for content from that page.

The file also doesn't have a copyright tag, so one must be added. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the {{GFDL-self}} tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Fair use, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair use. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Wikipedia:Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 23:06, 18 May 2008 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Corvus cornixtalk 23:06, 18 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Unspecified source and copyright for Image:Hi 63.jpg[edit]

Thanks for uploading Image:Hi 63.jpg. I notice the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you have not created this file yourself, then there needs to be a justification explaining why we have the right to use it on Wikipedia (see copyright tagging below). If you did not create the file yourself, then you need to specify where it was found, i.e., in most cases link to the website where it was taken from, and the terms of use for content from that page.

The file also doesn't have a copyright tag, so one must be added. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the {{GFDL-self}} tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Fair use, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair use. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Wikipedia:Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 23:07, 18 May 2008 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Corvus cornixtalk 23:07, 18 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Unspecified source and copyright for Image:Smilies 45.jpg[edit]

Thanks for uploading Image:Smilies 45.jpg. I notice the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you have not created this file yourself, then there needs to be a justification explaining why we have the right to use it on Wikipedia (see copyright tagging below). If you did not create the file yourself, then you need to specify where it was found, i.e., in most cases link to the website where it was taken from, and the terms of use for content from that page.

The file also doesn't have a copyright tag, so one must be added. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the {{GFDL-self}} tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Fair use, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair use. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Wikipedia:Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 23:07, 18 May 2008 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Corvus cornixtalk 23:07, 18 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Unspecified source and copyright for Image:Smileies 42.jpg[edit]

Thanks for uploading Image:Smileies 42.jpg. I notice the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you have not created this file yourself, then there needs to be a justification explaining why we have the right to use it on Wikipedia (see copyright tagging below). If you did not create the file yourself, then you need to specify where it was found, i.e., in most cases link to the website where it was taken from, and the terms of use for content from that page.

The file also doesn't have a copyright tag, so one must be added. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the {{GFDL-self}} tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Fair use, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair use. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Wikipedia:Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 23:09, 18 May 2008 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Corvus cornixtalk 23:09, 18 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Rachel elizabeth dare[edit]

A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Rachel elizabeth dare, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised because even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. Do you want to opt out of receiving this notice? // Chris (complaints)(contribs) 00:26, 19 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image copyright problem with Image:H 454.jpg[edit]

Image Copyright problem
Image Copyright problem

Thank you for uploading Image:H 454.jpg. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the image. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. Ricky81682 (talk) 18:59, 19 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image copyright problem with Image:Fgdjbu 258551.jpg[edit]

Image Copyright problem
Image Copyright problem

Thank you for uploading Image:Fgdjbu 258551.jpg. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the image. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. Ricky81682 (talk) 18:59, 19 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image copyright problem with Image:Hjkgjhdfjbgsj 456148.jpg[edit]

Image Copyright problem
Image Copyright problem

Thank you for uploading Image:Hjkgjhdfjbgsj 456148.jpg. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the image. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. Ricky81682 (talk) 18:59, 19 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image copyright problem with Image:H 552.jpg[edit]

Image Copyright problem
Image Copyright problem

Thank you for uploading Image:H 552.jpg. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the image. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. Ricky81682 (talk) 18:59, 19 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image copyright problem with Image:The lightning thief 6.jpg[edit]

Image Copyright problem
Image Copyright problem

Thank you for uploading Image:The lightning thief 6.jpg. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the image. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. Ricky81682 (talk) 18:59, 19 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image copyright problem with Image:Flyleaf 5.jpg[edit]

Image Copyright problem
Image Copyright problem

Thank you for uploading Image:Flyleaf 5.jpg. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the image. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. Ricky81682 (talk) 19:00, 19 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

WP:ANI notice[edit]

There is a discussion about your image uploads at Wikipedia:Administrators'_noticeboard/Incidents#User:Florida_babe. I'll just say take this as a final warning, do not upload another image without a copyright image until you have fixed the ones you already have been warned about or you will be blocked again. -- Ricky81682 (talk) 18:55, 19 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I'll just add that you are making a lot of extra work for other people and it is not appreciated. -- Ricky81682 (talk) 19:02, 19 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
As they say in the movies, "oh be-have". Seriously, though, we are trying to write an encyclopedia here, so don't make joke edits. Some readers looking for a serious article might not find them amusing. Remember, millions of people read Wikipedia, so we have to take what we do a bit seriously here. If you'd like to experiment with editing, try the sandbox, where you can write whatever you want (as long as it's not offensive). John Nagle (talk) 18:59, 29 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

--John Nagle (talk) 17:30, 20 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Redirect[edit]

I redirected your article, Rachel elizabeth dare, which means that by clicking on the link to that article you instead get the article on Percy Jackson & The Olympians. Someone had tagged it for deletion, but I thought it would be better to redirect it, because that way the content is still available in the page history in case you want to take it and do something else with it (and you can still recreate it if you want). You could write more about the character in the articles about the books she appears in, for example. Everyking (talk) 07:08, 20 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

This is not Myspace[edit]

As they say in the movies, "oh be-have". Seriously, though, we are trying to write an encyclopedia here, so don't make joke edits. Some readers looking for a serious article might not find them amusing. Remember, millions of people read Wikipedia, so we have to take what we do a bit seriously here. If you'd like to experiment with editing, try the sandbox, where you can write whatever you want (as long as it's not offensive). John Nagle (talk) 18:59, 29 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

--John Nagle (talk) 17:30, 20 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked[edit]

You have been blocked from editing in accordance with Wikipedia's blocking policy for repeatedly uploading copyrighted images after being repeatedly warned against it. If you believe this block is unjustified, you may contest the block by adding the text {{unblock|your reason here}} below. iridescent 21:22, 27 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I think you'll be unblocked if you promise not to upload copyvio images (if you don't know what is and isn't a copyvio image, just don't upload any images). Then you'll be free to contribute to articles and write about things. Everyking (talk) 08:32, 28 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]